A side question about the sound.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Demi-human

maybe likes firearms a little bit…
Joined
Dec 8, 2016
Messages
5,891
Location
The Haymarsh, MI (A.K.A. Paradise.)
Another thread had me wondering a question.

How loud is the supersonic crack of the bullet?

I can hear it as it goes down range and perceive the location of the crack moves with the bullet, outside.
But how loud is the crack inside?
Considering it travels fifteen feet, inside, how loud is that?
Is it perceptible over the suppressed report?
Is it too fast for our hearing to perceive?
Inside, without PPE, one hundred thirty decibels is loud! Does it cover the crack?
 
This is a video that’s not shot very far away. The ammunition exits right around the speed of sound out of that rifle.

2 of the rounds in this video definitely went super, can you tell which two?



The back ground noise is a jet some number of thousands of feet above, flying past.
 
Suppressed supersonic 223 sounds like unsuppressed 22lr out of a rifle.
If you are close enough to the impact point the shockwave won't have time to form but its like within about 5-10 feet.
I didn't measure just walked up to the berm until the crack stopped but it was pretty close.
 
The youtube channel "smarter everyday" did some high speed camera shots of the super sonic shock wave on 300bo both supersonic and subsonic rounds at a very large garage.
The sonic boom and it's reverberations off the walls and concrete floor were incredibly loud.
 
It depends on the bullet profile and velocity. It may seem counter-intuitive, but the sonic crack of slower, larger, more blunt bullets like 9mm & .40 cal tends to propagate closer to the shooter and be much more offensive to the ears than that of a higher velocity, more aerodynamic projectile such as 5.56 or .308.

I'll shoot suppressed .300 WM outdoors without ears no problem running my 1.6x9" Accipiter .30 model, but 115 gr. 9mm hurts my ears no matter what can or host is used.

This is a 16" Armalite with one of my older can models firing M193

 
Probably collected enough data to publish a white paper on this subject.

Absolutely cool!


So, in a room, even with a perfectly silent report, there will still be enough time for the shockwave to form around the bullet and fill the room with sound.
But it will still be much less than an unsuppressed rifle.
 
It depends on the bullet profile and velocity. It may seem counter-intuitive, but the sonic crack of slower, larger, more blunt bullets like 9mm & .40 cal tends to propagate closer to the shooter and be much more offensive to the ears than that of a higher velocity, more aerodynamic projectile such as 5.56 or .308.

Another interesting thing to know! :)
 
The difference when you’re shooting subsonic without hearing protection and then a round unexpectedly goes supersonic is painfully noticeable to me, especially when shooting under a roof at the range.
 
The way most bullets are shaped (not counting black powder spherical projectiles) and the way supersonic flow works you get the worst crack right around Mach 1.
 
Probably collected enough data to publish a white paper on this subject.

Are they claiming that an unburned granule of powder FROM THAT FIRED ROUND exited the muzzle before the bullet? So, to understand what they are claiming, a granule of powder started in the case behind the bullet, passed the bullet in the millisecond before the bullet entered the lands and grooves effectively sealing the bore from the chamber and achieved supersonic velocity ahead of the bullet as it traveled down the bore? Is that what they are thinking happened?

I'm thinking it may be a granule of unburned powder from the previous shot that was deposited in the bore and it was pushed out by the air ahead of the bullet as the bullet suddenly traveled down the bore.

Whatever the answer, it's interesting to postulate. I guess the only way to test it would be to fire a round, clean the bore to make sure nothing was left behind and then fire again. If another granule exited the clean bore, that granule of powder escaped past the actual bullet and traveled down the bore ahead of the bullet...maybe?
 
When I was lobbying for passage of the WA silencer use bill, I shot video of various rifles using supersonic ammo to demonstrate how "not quiet" they were. I had the camera set up down range and shot past it. 22lr, 17hmr and 308win all created loud whip cracking sounds as they past the camcorder.

While a camcorder video played back on computer speakers is a poor way to evaluate gun sounds, I got the point across to the legislators who viewed the video that suppressed firearms can still be rather noisy.
 
The noise of the supersonic bullet is louder than the muzzle blast when heard from down range. Here is a brief clip from a video I made years ago when I was trying to convince a MN state Senator to push a silencer bill.

Two rounds of 22lr (CCI Blazer) followed by two rounds of 17hmr then 2 rounds of 7.62x51.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top