spiroxlii
Member
Ibmii, my SxS .410/.45LC derringer's recoil isn't that bad, but the gun itself isn't really designed with ergonomics in mind. It doesn't fit in the hand very well. It's manageable once you get used to it, but the recoil does punish the shooter's hand more than it really has to, and the muzzle wants to flip up.
If you compare the felt recoil and muzzle flip between my derringer and my Colt SAA replica firing the exact same .45LC loads, the derringer could scare a new shooter away from .45LC while the revolver makes them feel quite comfortable.
I haven't done a similar comparison with .410, since my Colt SAA replica can't fire them. I would imagine that if you compared the felt recoil and muzzle flip between my derringer and something like a Taurus Judge revolver, you'd notice a similar effect to the one I mentioned above.
It makes sense. A revolver has greater mass and fits in the shooter's hand better, so the recoil is naturally more manageable.
If you compare the felt recoil and muzzle flip between my derringer and my Colt SAA replica firing the exact same .45LC loads, the derringer could scare a new shooter away from .45LC while the revolver makes them feel quite comfortable.
I haven't done a similar comparison with .410, since my Colt SAA replica can't fire them. I would imagine that if you compared the felt recoil and muzzle flip between my derringer and something like a Taurus Judge revolver, you'd notice a similar effect to the one I mentioned above.
It makes sense. A revolver has greater mass and fits in the shooter's hand better, so the recoil is naturally more manageable.