TurtlePhish
Member
Just saw on TV (NBC), Justice Dept. sent a letter saying that Eric Holder would not be prosecuted. :banghead:
You can call Mexico whatever you wish but I have seen enough of it to forbid any of my family to set foot across that border, my son says Uncle Sugar won't let him go there. They seem to like to bury folks in mass graves and do a little beheading to keep the peasants in line. If you think cops in the US are a PITA get hooked up in the legal system down there, your family will go broke getting you back.The US does not share a border with a third world nation.
The main source is David Voth, who now claims the only guns "walked" in the whole Operation F&F were six Draco AK pistols "walked" by whistleblower Dodson in an undercover operation.
The Fortune article is credible if you have not been following the issue the past year and a half and have only been skimming headlines.
Sorry! I am not politically correct!The US does not share a border with a third world nation.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newly_industrialized_country
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Developing_country
This will last well into the next POTUS term, and the next administration will crush Holder.
This is evidence that will prove that some people are above the law if he's not prosecuted. You better believe any of us would have been prosecuted.
Heck a guy from Washington just went to jail for a year for selling a gun to a Canadian. Why not those involved in authorizing F&F?
Read this article from Ann Coulter in which she outlines that the powers that be don't want to release the documents because F&F was a huge anti gun play by the administration to turn the nation against guns. Very sinister if true
http://news.investors.com/article/616669/201206291741/fast-furious-eric-holder-obama-corruption.htm
My applause goes out to the moderator willing to do so.Ann Coulter's column is very interesting, I agree with it. I once got accused of being a "tin foil hat wearer" by a Moderator on this site, for suggesting the same, that was before the E-mails came out suggesting the same.
I wear the accusation with pride!
My applause goes out to the moderator willing to do so.
With so many threads on this same subject, I can't remember in which one I had referenced historical postings which came to conclusions which were in complete absence of existing evidence. Exhibit A has kindly been presented. And, curiously enough, is willing to wear the accusation of tin foil hattery as a warning to all readers.
Considering your established pattern of argument, and the fact that e-mails supporting my position have been released, (the existing evidence you deny) I would be worried if you agreed with me.
Two of Holder's emails and one by Deputy Attorney General James Cole were among documents the Justice Department showed Tuesday to Republican and Democratic staffers of the House Oversight and Government Affairs Committee in an effort to ward off a criminal contempt vote against the attorney general.
The full contents of the emails were described to The Associated Press by two people who have seen them. Both people spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak about them publicly.
For the past year and a half, some Republicans have promoted the idea that Holder and other top-level officials at the Justice Department knew federal agents in Operation Fast and Furious had engaged in a risky tactic known as "gun-walking."
Two of Holder's emails and one from Cole appear to show that they hadn't known about gun-walking but were determined to find out whether the allegations were true.
I remember on one of the early "Fast and Furious" threads, you dismissed the entire story because "Faux News" had carried it. How embarrassing!
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...tisan-contempt-vote-against-holder-this-week/Issa kept his focus on the Justice Department, clarifying that he has no evidence the White House was involved in any Fast and Furious cover-up.
You mean these emails?
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap...hQLokA?docId=44ff0778c01e45709c1df986a2be0c4e
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...tisan-contempt-vote-against-holder-this-week/
Now we can see if the dancing is to the beat of the drum of Fox News.
Im not amused by the derogatory/inflammatory undertones in your posts towards people and countries.
Mexico, like the USA and many other countries in the world, have area that are very modern as well as very rural. Corruption is in all of them too.
Calling Mexico a "hell hole" is about as valid as saying "guns are evil".
Tactics like that devalues whatever valid point your trying to make.
Seems to me that his state bar should disbar him.
Can't be a lawyer without it.
Doubt you can be Attorney General without a law license.
My, my, I am sure glad you brought me to my senses about how great Mexico is! All those beheadings and shootings, are just figments of some reporters imagination, and I am sure glad you think they are the greatest thing since sliced bread.
Thank you for posting that primary source which corroborates the Associated Press quote that I posted earlier indicating the lack of knowledge by Holder and Cole of gun walking from their emails.Heres the latest "T-III" info that may be interesting to those who care...to care.
(PS, T-III is lingo for wiretap)
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=ca2_1341068707
Also, another issue detailed in the papers... questions if the paperwork was pencil whipped. Meaning was it placed on a desk of high ranking officials, where they skimmed at best... read the title at worst.... then threw a signature to it and moved on. Also...as stated in the papers above.... the evidence of guns being allowed to walk was totally against SOP and the required restrictions placed on ATF. These measures where contained in the wire tap request, where it was obviously "overlooked" somehow and allowed to continue. The gun running that is.
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap...hQLokA?docId=44ff0778c01e45709c1df986a2be0c4e"I hope the AG understands that we did not allow guns to walk," an official at the ATF's Washington headquarters said on March 10 in an email that Holder's aides forwarded to the attorney general.
In a response, Holder wrote, "Do they really, really know" that there was no gun-walking?