Moparmike, you need not be concerned. The Militia Act was codified in 10 USC 311 and is current today. We are the 'unorganized militia' mentioned in paragraph (b) part (2).
TITLE 10 > Subtitle A > PART I > CHAPTER 13 > Sec. 311
Sec. 311. - Militia: composition and classes
(a) The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age and, except as provided in section 313 of title 32, under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention to become, citizens of the United States and of female citizens of the United States who are members of the National Guard.
(b) The classes of the militia are -
(1) the organized militia, which consists of the National Guard and the Naval Militia; and
(2) the unorganized militia, which consists of the members of the militia who are not members of the National Guard or the Naval Militia
This is exactly the section of code I use in debates with anti-gunners when they claim that the Second Amendment applies only to the 'militia'. I then go into the explaination of the word 'people' all through the Bill of Rights then move on to the U.S. V. Miller ruling where the court said:
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=307&invol=174
'The signification attributed to the term Militia appears from the debates in the Convention, the history and legislation of Colonies and States, and the writings of approved commentators. These show plainly enough that the Militia comprised all males physically capable of acting in concert for the common defense. 'A body of citizens enrolled for military discipline.' And further, that ordinarily when called for service [/B]these men were expected to appear bearing arms supplied by themselves and of the kind in common use at the time.'
If we aren't allowed to have guns, how are we to 'appear bearing arms supplied by themselves'? I even debated an attorney from Va. who worked for the Clinton administration, he left the debate.
SLAM DUNK!