All Popular Calibers Have Been Outlawed. What Oddball/Obsolete Caliber Do You Carry

Status
Not open for further replies.
38 Super in a semi
45 Colt in revolvers

I think they are the same people that say that the 10 mm is just as powerful as the 41mag :evil:

That's about barrel length. Compare the best 10mm loads from a 4-5" semi-auto barrel to a 41 mag revolver with a 3-4" barrel,( roughly the same overall length) and the 2 are pretty darn close. Now if you start shooting 41 mag from a 6" or longer barrel 10mm starts to fall way behind.
 
Some people say the 41 Remington Magnum is obsolete. I think they are the same people that say that the 10 mm is just as powerful as the 41mag :evil:
I love my 41 mag!!!

The .41 Rem Mag guys are about the most sensitive going LOL. They’ll defend their choice of cartridge to the bitter end, even when nobody is criticizing it! ;)
 
I would be in trouble. I base a lot of what I purchase around how easy can I get ammo for it. So if all the common stuff was banned or dwindled supply (like the past year) I would have to get something that wasn't affected.
 
As soon as any of the above becomes popular then whichever body outlawed all the old popular cartridges would just outlaw any that became popular…..until there were none left.

A G21 depth mag well with a G17 width grip would be quite neat for a higher than commonly seen capacity 38 Super.
 
44 special and 45 colt are both excellent calibers. I wouldn't call either one "oddball" or "obsolete", but I only come across either one at the local sporting goods stores occasionally, back in normal times.

I am good with either one for CC or HD. In fact, I've been carrying a Charter Arms Bulldog regularly for some time now.

Likewise 32 H&R magnum and 327 magnum aren't exactly obsolete. But again you were very lucky to find either at a sporting goods store, even BC.

I have a few 32 magnum revolvers. I don't happen to carry any of them or leave them available for HD, but I would.

32acp is probably too common to put on the list, IMHO. I saw it regularly at Wally World and Academy just a couple of years ago.

I don't reload, but if I did, 45 auto rim, 455 Webley, and 38 S&W come to mind as possibly useful calibers. 32 NAA might be another one.

32 S&W long is weaker than I'd prefer, but I suppose hot loads in a sturdy revolver would be better than nothing.



 
7.62x25 Tokarev - I've clocked the 50's production Bulgarian surplus 85gr at 1880fps. You should see the fireball. I wish it was more popular and more available.

460 S&W - Talk about packing some heat and you can shoot 45 Long Colt.
 
Any or all of these:

.32ACP (if not ruled "too common." If so ruled, then 7.65mm Browning.) :D

.32HRM

.327FM

9x18 Makarov (this would probably be my EDC caliber.)

7.62x25mm Tokarev

.22LR (if not ruled "too common")

.25ACP

.22WMR

.44 Special

I am currently missing the .327FM, .32HRM, and .44 Special.
 
Last edited:
I haven't tried, but there are some online that say theirs can shoot 38 Super without issue.

I personally would not shoot 38 Super in a 9mm Largo pistol, especially the older ones.

I have actually done the opposite. I have a bunch of 9mm Largo ammo I loaded up years ago with Starline brass that I shoot in my RIA 9mm 1911 with the 38 Super barrel installed. The 9mm Largo rim is closer in size to 9mmx19 so I didn't have to adjust the extractor.
 
But, I could always fall back to....



C1ED1680-9A62-4717-AE99-1771ED5B678A.jpeg

“No 9mm, 40S&W, 10mm, 45ACP, 380, 38Special, 357Mag, 44Mag.”

Reading your list. I’m still good
.32 acp .32 H&R. 9x18 Mak. 357 SIG .41 magnum. .44 Special.

Probably load up my old S&W Model 58 .41 Mag and not feel terribly unarmed.
 
Last edited:
Based on volume of available factory ammo, and on the relative numbers of revolvers actually made for it, .45 Colt is a relatively rare bird, and already a firm favorite, of mine. My candidates for daily carry would be my Ruger SRH Alaskan, and USFA Single Actions. (I have aged-out of any desire to fire .454 Casull ammo, in my SRH Alaskan.) I actually would carry a single-action sixgun, for defensive purposes, as their shoot-ability, and nice balance when worn in a belt holster, make them quite easy to live with, on a daily basis. Not saying that I do, now, regularly tote an SAA-type weapon, but, for the purposes of this thought exercise, I am saying that I would do so, especially if I were to back-it-up with another weapon, for continuity of fire.

The various .32 cartridges would certainly be candidates. I realize that Thirty-Twos get many mentions on forums, and in songs about Leroy Brown, but there are relatively few folks who actually buy .32 handguns, other than the Kel-Tecs. My .32 ACP candidates, for carry, would be my Seecamp LWS-32 pistols. (I rarely carry them, now, but in this dystopian scenario, I would think that deep concealment might be very necessary. Trained observed tend to look for asymmetry, so balancing one’s silhouette with a pair of tiny pistols might be a wise.) I also have a J-Frame, and an SP101, chambered for .32 H&R, and some of the shorter-cased predecessors would safely chamber, as well.

I carried a .41 duty revolver, in the Eighties. I would have to have a talented ‘smith tighten-up the moving parts, if I ever wanted to resume regular shooting. N-Frames are usually too much of a reach, to the trigger face, for my index finger, but this one has had its striations ground-down, and the edges rounded, resulting in a good fit, if I use thin grips, that do not cover the back-strap, am am not wearing gloves. My aging hands would not like shooting big-bore Magnums, so, I’d have to hand-load to “.41 Special” velocity.

That covers the uncommon cartridges, for which I own functional handguns. The .45 Colt, and the Thirty-Twos, were the easy answers.

I could get a 357 SIG barrel, which would be a drop-in fit, in my P229R DAK, one of my former duty pistols, from 2004 to 2015. Notably, however, the reason I set this pistol aside was because its high bore axis, and light-alloy frame. combined with the snappy acceleration of the then-mandated .40 S&W duty cartridge, was really vexing my aging right thumb, and, and wrist. (I transitioned to a “orthopedic” 9mm Glock G17, soon after my chief authorized that option, in duty pistol policy.) 357 SIG is said to have less recoil than .40 S&W, but I doubt the shooting experience would be pleasant, unless I added one of the competition-oriented weights to the accessory rail.

The .38 Super has had my attention, for a number of years, though I have yet to buy. An all-steel 1911 remains tolerably shootable, in my aging right hand, and .38 Super would recoil a bit less.

These come to mind, even before caffeine has fully taken effect, and with a load of other things on my mind.
 
When they outlaw 22, 38, 44, 32, 45, 9, and 40 for being dangerously normal, I plan to switch to .32-20

With 32.20, you can buy cool old SW and Colt revolvers for a little cheaper than normal calibers, chop the barrels, and have a pair of carry guns that are plenty good enough it seems to me.

upload_2021-8-12_10-28-58.jpeg
 
But, but but... most of my small revolvers and pocket pistols are odd, esoteric, weird, obsolete, and otherwise oddball :notworthy::feet:

The Webleys in .45AR/.455 Mk.1 and .380 Mk.II aren't exactly pocket size, though either would make a good nightstand gun. The P-64 in 9mm Mak. definitely is pocket size, TDA, and very handy.

As for the bigger foreign military surplus semi-autos, the CZ-52 and Norinco M54 in 7.62 Tok. are sidearms I'd prefer not to carry... or fire without good hearing protection.

I do have quite a few small revolvers in .38S&W, .32S&W, and .32S&W Long - and hunting revolvers in .32-20 and .44-40 - so I think no matter how broad the ban, as long as it doesn't effect cartridges at least 100 years old and never issued to the US Military, I should be fine.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top