Anti-War Protests Have Big Price Tags

Status
Not open for further replies.

CMichael

Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2003
Messages
394
Location
Michigan
From Foxnews.com

Anti-War Protests Have Big Price Tags

Tuesday, March 18, 2003

SEATTLE — Large anti-war protests come with a hefty price tag.

Money is needed to rent or buy stages, sound systems, permits and portable toilets, and tabs often run as high as $200,000 per demonstration — much more than the average grassroots peace group will ever have in its coffers.

So who is picking up the tab?

"The major anti-U.S. government demonstrations are organized by people who have been around for a long time, particularly the Workers World Party, which has existed for more than 30 years now and has always supported the enemies of the United States," said Herbert Romerstein, a retired agent of the U.S. Information Agency.

The Workers World Party describes itself as Marxist in nature.

Officially, protest organizers are groups such as Not in Our Name and International A.N.S.W.E.R., but the demonstration's sponsors have long histories of backing anti-government causes.

Not in Our Name is financed by the Interreligious Foundation for Community Organization. I.F.C.O. is a million-dollar-a-year non-profit that supports Cuban dictator Fidel Castro and once sponsored a group headed by Sami Al-Arian — the University of South Florida professor being charged with fundraising for terrorist organizations Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad.

A.N.S.W.E.R. is an offshoot of the International Action Center, which intelligence officials say is a front for the Worker's World Party. A.N.S.W.E.R. canceled a scheduled interview with Fox News but a worker in the Seattle field office acknowledged there are ties.

"There are some Workers World Party members in A.N.S.W.E.R.," said A.N.S.W.E.R. coordinator Jim McMahan.

The International Action Center was founded by former U.S. Attorney General Ramsey Clark, who is a longtime public face of the anti-war movement.

The Workers World Party supports North Korea's brutal regime and I.F.C.O. defied U.N. sanctions when it made a trip to Iraq in the mid-1990s. Now, both are sugar daddies to the anti-war movement.

"The American people have the right to know whether stooges of [North Korean leader] Kim Jong Il or Castro or Saddam Hussein are involved in these demonstrations," Romerstein said.

The groups bankrolling these protests say they're spending their money the way donors would want, and protest organizers say it doesn't matter where the money comes from — the message is their own.

Others wonder if knowing the fringe politics of the people paying the bills might keep some demonstrators off the streets.

But anti-war organizers — regardless of their financial backing — are plugging ahead and are actually planning more aggressive action that they say will be hard to ignore, despite the fact that the United States is on the brink of war with Iraq.

"People will step up their actions, there will be active civil disobedience," said Simona Sharoni of United for Peace in Thurston County, Wash.

Direct Action, a San Francisco Bay-area group of anti-war veterans, has been drawing up their own battle plan should there be a war.

They say they will shut down 70 targets in San Francisco alone, including power plants, water systems, the Federal Reserve, oil companies, the Pacific Exchange and the Transamerica Building.

And their hit list goes beyond economic targets.

Some protesters are promising to chain themselves to fences at schools and day care centers so working parents will have to stay home from their jobs. Organizers say this will give others a chance to contemplate how war affects the children of Iraq.

"The civilians in Iraq are losing their lives and one day of work is worth a thousand lives," said Leone Reinbold, an anti-war activist in San Francisco.

Reinbold helped organize the World Trade Organization protest in Seattle three years ago. She blames the violence and damage on anarchists from the radical fringe, not the mainstream demonstrators.

All the same, police departments from coast to coast know that keeping things peaceful won't be easy.

"We know based on the last one that each preceding demonstration has been a little bit more volatile than the one before," said Deputy Chief Greg Suhr of the San Francisco Police Department.

Some protestors are vowing to bring traffic to a standstill, as they recently did on a Seattle bridge. But many wonder if paralyzing the morning commute and engaging in similar disruptions will win converts or make enemies of people losing patience with their tactics.

Fox News' Dan Springer contributed to this report
 
If you dislike anit-war activists...well...

your going to love this!


Anti-War Protests Have Big Price Tags
Tuesday, March 18, 2003

SEATTLE — Large anti-war protests come with a hefty price tag.

Money is needed to rent or buy stages, sound systems, permits and portable toilets, and tabs often run as high as $200,000 per demonstration — much more than the average grassroots peace group will ever have in its coffers.

So who is picking up the tab?

"The major anti-U.S. government demonstrations are organized by people who have been around for a long time, particularly the Workers World Party, which has existed for more than 30 years now and has always supported the enemies of the United States," said Herbert Romerstein, a retired agent of the U.S. Information Agency.

The Workers World Party describes itself as Marxist in nature.

Officially, protest organizers are groups such as Not in Our Name and International A.N.S.W.E.R., but the demonstration's sponsors have long histories of backing anti-government causes.

Not in Our Name is financed by the Interreligious Foundation for Community Organization. I.F.C.O. is a million-dollar-a-year non-profit that supports Cuban dictator Fidel Castro and once sponsored a group headed by Sami Al-Arian — the University of South Florida professor being charged with fundraising for terrorist organizations Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad.

A.N.S.W.E.R. is an offshoot of the International Action Center, which intelligence officials say is a front for the Worker's World Party. A.N.S.W.E.R. canceled a scheduled interview with Fox News but a worker in the Seattle field office acknowledged there are ties.

"There are some Workers World Party members in A.N.S.W.E.R.," said A.N.S.W.E.R. coordinator Jim McMahan.

The International Action Center was founded by former U.S. Attorney General Ramsey Clark, who is a longtime public face of the anti-war movement.

The Workers World Party supports North Korea's brutal regime and I.F.C.O. defied U.N. sanctions when it made a trip to Iraq in the mid-1990s. Now, both are sugar daddies to the anti-war movement.

"The American people have the right to know whether stooges of [North Korean leader] Kim Jong Il or Castro or Saddam Hussein are involved in these demonstrations," Romerstein said.

The groups bankrolling these protests say they're spending their money the way donors would want, and protest organizers say it doesn't matter where the money comes from — the message is their own.

Others wonder if knowing the fringe politics of the people paying the bills might keep some demonstrators off the streets.

But anti-war organizers — regardless of their financial backing — are plugging ahead and are actually planning more aggressive action that they say will be hard to ignore, despite the fact that the United States is on the brink of war with Iraq.

"People will step up their actions, there will be active civil disobedience," said Simona Sharoni of United for Peace in Thurston County, Wash.

Direct Action, a San Francisco Bay-area group of anti-war veterans, has been drawing up their own battle plan should there be a war.

They say they will shut down 70 targets in San Francisco alone, including power plants, water systems, the Federal Reserve, oil companies, the Pacific Exchange and the Transamerica Building.

And their hit list goes beyond economic targets.

Some protesters are promising to chain themselves to fences at schools and day care centers so working parents will have to stay home from their jobs. Organizers say this will give others a chance to contemplate how war affects the children of Iraq.

"The civilians in Iraq are losing their lives and one day of work is worth a thousand lives," said Leone Reinbold, an anti-war activist in San Francisco.

Reinbold helped organize the World Trade Organization protest in Seattle three years ago. She blames the violence and damage on anarchists from the radical fringe, not the mainstream demonstrators.

All the same, police departments from coast to coast know that keeping things peaceful won't be easy.

"We know based on the last one that each preceding demonstration has been a little bit more volatile than the one before," said Deputy Chief Greg Suhr of the San Francisco Police Department.

Some protestors are vowing to bring traffic to a standstill, as they recently did on a Seattle bridge. But many wonder if paralyzing the morning commute and engaging in similar disruptions will win converts or make enemies of people losing patience with their tactics.

Fox News' Dan Springer contributed to this report.

The Story

Now those of you who are against this war, well check your company that your keeping.
 
IMO permits are bunk. The KKK has every right to march through Chinatown PEACEFULLY promoting their politics, if they can handle the smell and the welcoming committee of armed citizens.
 
This is part of the reason why, despite opposing this war, I wouldn't be caught dead at one of those protests.
 
I was at a "Peace Rally" as security on Saturday. I am not sure who the chief has us protecting them from, since even some of the TV stations didn't care enough to show up.
What a bunch of clueless blithering idiots.
Now to see that they are funded by foriegn govts makes me all the more impressed. ;)
 
So I stopped buying Levi's and Ben & Jerry's

That's cool. More ice cream for me!!! :D But Levi's? What did I miss?



I am not sure who the chief has us protecting them from,

Um, we don't know either, but if you figure it out could you lemme know? I've never understood that. :)

What a bunch of clueless blithering idiots.

:rolleyes: At least they're standing up for their beliefs, and exercising their Constitutional Rights. More than most Americans can say for themselves.

Now to see that they are funded by foriegn govts makes me all the more impressed.

:confused: :confused:
 
So you support stupid people who express poorly reasoned opinions and are backed by foriegn govts? ;)
I do support their right to free speech, no matter how wrong or stupid they may be.

They are the puppets for foriegn govts, if they are accepting money from them. Oh wait, I just defined the Democratic parties fund raising strategy. ;)

As long as there are plenty of people like them, I will continue to have a job. :D

I wanted to stand up for my beliefs at that rally, but my Sgt said I couldn't carry my "Peace Through Superior Firepower" sign.
So sadly I had to just stand there on overtime making $38 an hour. :( :neener:
 
So you support stupid people who express poorly reasoned opinions and are backed by foriegn govts?

I support anyone expressing their political opinions, regardless of how uninformed or misinformed I may believe them to be. :) And since I don't know where most people get their backing, and I'm almost afraid to ask how you know such information, then I can't really make that judgement.

I do support their right to free speech, no matter how wrong or stupid they may be.

:cool:

They are the puppets for foriegn govts, if they are accepting money from them.

What in the world are you talking about? Like I said, most orgs can just get stuff donated.

As long as there are plenty of people like them, I will continue to have a job.

Excuse me, but who is "them"? People voicing political opinions? Yes, what a crazy bunch we are. :rolleyes:
 
I wondered where the support for these massive protests came from..............:rolleyes:
I say arrest the ones who disrupt the normal routines and that should offset the budget deficit in those cities......:D
 
Does the US Constitution say anything about permits or fees for public gatherings?
On whose property?
Playing around on the courthouse lawn means playing by the rules set by the gentlefolks elected in that town, no?
 
The "them" are idiots, not necessarily protestors, but they can be the same, it's up to them if they are idiots. :D
Providing security for idiots, arresting idiots.
I have a career revolving around idiots. :D
 
Some protestors are vowing to bring traffic to a standstill, as they recently did on a Seattle bridge.
Some protestors tried this crap when I was on my way to Howard AFB, from Panama City after Just Cause. They changed their minds about blocking me and hurling bricks at me when they saw a 3200 lb Buick hurling at them at 60 mph. Nothing but ***holes and elbows.

They have no right to restrict my lawfull travel or my ability to perform my duties and make a living.
 
Some protesters are promising to chain themselves to fences at schools and day care centers so working parents will have to stay home from their jobs.

They have obviously never seen my wife trying to get to work on time...they must have a death wish.:D

I guess you never know until the time comes, but I believe if I encountered these freaks while dropping off or picking up my kids it would get bad..Quick!:fire:
 
What you guys are describing are criminals.
Protesting does not involve the activities that these people are saying they will use.
Anyone who "protests" in that manner has no honor.
 
Many groups can just get stuff donated.

Could free speach be called, stuffing donated stuff where the sun dont shine, into the blithering idiots? That would be expressing a political opinion.:neener:
 
I've blocked a road in my day, and I'd do it again for a cause I believe in. :)

Could free speach be called, stuffing donated stuff where the sun dont shine, into the blithering idiots? That would be expressing a political opinion.

I don't get it. :confused:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top