All this talk of Confederate revolvers just adds to my aggravation......
CSA imported more Kerr revolvers from LAC than the total amount of made in The South revolvers. Yet no one makes a Kerr repro. A CSA officer or Cavalryman would be TWICE as likely to be armed with a Kerr as a G&G.
-kBob
Your points are well-taken, sir, however the Kerr is a
secondary Confederate pistol because it was made in England unlike the "inferior" Remingtons, Colts, and Confederate copies and
imported.
The same can be said for the LeMat pistols as a
secondary Confederate pistol.
I confess that I have paid little attention to the Kerr (pronounced "Carr") and my info comes from a book "Confederate Handguns" (Albaugh, Benet, Simmons, 1963), in which a total of 3 pages are devoted to it (pp 180-182).
Hypothetically, if a somewhat large amount of Remington NMA, Colt Navy, and Colt Army revolvers were captured from Union forces by Confederate forces and used by them, would those be considered Confederate revolvers?
How many Italian replica Spiller and Burr, Rogers and Spencer, and Starr SA and DA pistols have been offered and not sold in any quantity?
It's called the free market. Manufacturers will only make something that they can make a profit on, and presently it is only Uberti and Pietta that are producing the majority of Italian copies. It takes a lot of money to CNC a new replica firearm and they expect a good return on their buck.
It would take very little insofar as changes to create a Pietta J.H. Dance .36 (which is historically correct): mill off the recoil shields on a 1851 Navy .36 prior to color case and it is done. (Pietta does/did make a J.H Dance .44 using a modified 1851 Navy frame and a larger diameter non-rebated cylinder. To me, a complete oxymoron.) The same ease in making a Tucker and Sherrard using an Uberti 2nd Model Colt Dragoon squareback without milling the load aperture on the barrel lug and a smooth cylinder (and there has been much discussion about the lack of aperture since most of those pistols were assembled from parts after the ACW).
The problem is that few buyers are looking for these pistols, let alone ever having heard of them. So where is the market?
I collect newer CNC Pietta 1851 Navy
type .36 revolvers because the parts are all interchangeable, which allows me to create many variations within a few minutes.
Sorry you are so aggravated, kBob.
I am opening a cold brew now. Salut!
Jim