Any one else seem to be moving from autos to wheelguns?

Status
Not open for further replies.

ddj8052

Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2003
Messages
331
Location
Nipomo, CA
One year ago I had 6 autos and 2 wheel guns. Today I have 6 wheel guns and 2 autos with a third on the way. I have found that I really only like 1911's when it comes to autos. I realise that certian autos fit some special applications better than others, but with the exception of something really small the 1911 pretty much does it all. Of course the one auto that I have on hold is a Taurus pt-111, because it is smaller than you can get with a 1911 and the controls are in the same places as 1911's so this smplfies things. So other than that I seem to be drawn more and more to wheelguns.

Wheel guns IMHO are much simpler to use, which actually enhances their versatility in my eyes. As a nightstand gun, you do not have to worry about rounds sitting in a magazine for extended periods of time, and even better you do not have to worry about bullet set back when you are loading and unloading between range trips. At the range you do not have to chase brass. The longer I shoot, the more I appreciate this feature. Just dump the brass into your container and you are done. Also it is easier to to train with a revolver. I find it very helpful to skip load inorder to stay away from that dreaded flinch. Have you ever tried skip loading an auto?

So this is not a auto VS wheelgun thread I just thought some might feel the same way about wheel guns as I do. I know I have my eye out for another 686 this one with a 4" barrel :) . later Juan.
 
In `61, I started with a revolver as a duty gun. When I went into the Army, I carried a 1911. When I went back to law enforcement, I was issued another revolver. I went to another department and carried a Python for 20 years until I was forced, kicking and screaming, to transition to a Sig 220. When I retired in `90, I bought the Sig and then carried it for another four years when I worked for the courts.

Now that I'm retired, my "always" gun is the "beast", my Smith 340SC. Because of its weight, it carries very well in IWB, paddle, pocket, and ankle holsters. If they made a small Sc/Ti .45 auto, I might carry it,

John
 
I'm slowly purging my autos in favor or revolvers. I have one auto (a Kahr K9) that will be going up for sale in the next week or two. That'll leave me with just the Kel-Tec P32. I haven't decided if I'll sell it or not. I doubt I'll get much for it and it is concealable when other guns aren't.

Chris
 
i've always favored revolvers over semi-autos, though right now i have equal amounts of each. i grew up shooting only revolvers, didn't shoot an auto until i bought my first one at age 22.

i clean all my guns obsessively, and i've never experienced a failure with my autos. but, if it comes down to it, i feel more comfortable with a revolver in my hand for personal defense.
 
I do not purge guns. I rarely sell a firearm.

The more experience I gain in shooting though, the more I tend to move towards revolvers. I am not a semi auto basher nor do I necessarly think that revolvers are more reliable then a good semi. They both have pros and cons. Revolvers even tend to have more extreme malfunctions when they do occure. That being said I am graviating more towards the revolver as far as a serious social defensive firearm goes.

A recent post of mine went something like this though.....

As far as civillian, serious social, handguns are concerned I find myself gravitating more and more to revolvers. Now I am a gun guy and find myself proficient with just about anything that goes bang, thats proficient not perfect. I know how to use just about anything.

I have never held a bias against revolvers and have always thought that with every release of some new tiny, tiny wunder-auto that someone was trying to answer a question that had been more then adequately answered many moons ago with the J-Frame sized revolver

Now as far as why I find myself gravitating even more towards revolvers.

1)Super easy to load, unload, inspect etc. No bullet setback issues, no decocking, applying of safeties etc. Easy to wipe down due to ease of unloading and reloading.

2)In my experience super reliable, more so then automatics, especially itty bitty autos. Now all of my autos have been super reliable as well and most have never malfunctioned but the fact remains that in my life I have experienced at least one malfunction with every semi auto brand out there. I have NEVER personally had a malfunction with a revolver. Now I do understand the trade off is that a semi auto malfunction is usually quickly cleared vs. an revo likely being put out of action.

3)Easier for me to carry especially pocket carry and give me more confidence with the long double action pull as far as safety is concerned.

4)The ability to load any kind of ammo under the son from mild to wild from round nosed, to flat nose, to HP, SWC, lead, jacketed, crazy, buttstomping, buffalo killin', cruise missiles etc. I find that my test period is smaller when breaking in a new revolver because of their general lack of ammo sensitivity. Now I realize that there are rare occassions that certain revolvers are sensitive to ammo such as super light guns with super light bullet weights but in general they will just about literally feed rocks.

5)The single action trigger pull on a decent well broken in revolver is absolutely spectacular. I have never shot a semi auto pistol with a better trigger pull. Rifles with set triggers are better but as a rule the single action pull on a revolver is just about the best you are going to get in a normal production, no competition gun.

6)Not held back by the need of an external feeding device. Most semi auto malfunctions stem from either the magazine or the extractor in my experience. Revolvers have numerous charging methods including speed strips, speed loaders, moon clips and loose round feeding. I think this is a very strong point. Now of course this strength is balanced or outweighed by the slower reloading speed. When I say slower reloading speed I am talking about us normal folks not the Jerry Miculeks of the world.

7)In my experience the great majority of modern revolvers made by reputable companies are strong like bull. As in they would make a hell of a hammer or impact weapon. This is not really a huge strength since a good quality auto is also a very strong weapon but revolvers can typically be built to handle much higher pressures.

8)They are easy to learn and teach others to shoot. Full size .357 magnums allow anybody to shoot them due to the fact that they can be loaded with such a variety of ammo. Have a small framed friend who is recoil shy, no problem load up some .38 special. Want to go hunt the great white buffalo no problem load up some of them thar afore mentioned crazy butt stomping rounds. I think this versatility allows for a nice platform to gradually teach new shooters while ramping up slowly over time.

9)NO BRASS TO CLEAN UP. For all of you folks who don't worry about policing your brass......SHAME ON YOU. Clean your brass up and leave the place as clean or cleaner then you left it. For all you reloaders the advantage is obvious.

Now these are just a few of the big advantages I see to practical use of revolvers. As with any tool there are just as many disadvantages to the platform that need to be weighed upon and I have only touched on a couple in the above. Like most tools a personal decision needs to be made as to whether the pros outweight the cons for you personally. For me, average, suburbanite, white, married male, who carries little cash, doesn't do drugs, doesn't sleep with other folks wives etc. the revolver makes alot of sense in an EDC firearm. Were I to be going into harms way my choice would likely change to semi-automatic...............preferably one in a rifle or guage caliber but I digress.

Anyway that is my two cents and anyone reading this should take it for what it is worth, after taxes about .4 cents or not much at all. I am not a gunfighter, cop, "operator", or some kind of high speed low drag ninja. I am a regular low speed high drag guy who knows a little about guns, a little about shooting and am trying to pass along my personal experience to other folks in case they are trying to make a decision for themselve. Maybe my little diatrobe will help them go one way or the other. I have several, ok read that as a buttload of firearms of all types so I do have some practical experience with many different platforms but I am no means an expert, heck I ain't even that edumacated on the subject.

Take care, shoot safe and have fun.

Chris
 
Well I guess I'm an oddball because my autos outnumber my revolvers by almost 3 to 1 ratio I don't hesitate for a second to rely on one of my HK's for HD/SD purposes. I like both types of guns, but I do tend to prefer the autos for the most part.
 
The thing I have learned is find a platform, train with it, learn it, know it, love it. Learn it's quirks, learn it's strengths and learn it's weaknesses. Know these things and know how to use it and you will be a formidable, bad man in a fight whether you are packing a HK USP, SIG P220, Smith 686, Ruger SP101 or a Civil War era black powder Navy revolver. Software not hardware wins the the fight IMO.

Chris
 
...........or bad woman. No disrespect meant. I realize there are many women on these forums, not to mention many women who could shoot me down like a duck. :D

Free beer to the one who picks up the obscure move ref. :D
 
ddj8052 said:
One year ago I had 6 autos and 2 wheel guns. Today I have 6 wheel guns and 2 autos with a third on the way. I have found that I really only like 1911's when it comes to autos. I realise that certian autos fit some special applications better than others, but with the exception of something really small the 1911 pretty much does it all. Of course the one auto that I have on hold is a Taurus pt-111, because it is smaller than you can get with a 1911 and the controls are in the same places as 1911's so this smplfies things. So other than that I seem to be drawn more and more to wheelguns.

Wheel guns IMHO are much simpler to use, which actually enhances their versatility in my eyes. As a nightstand gun, you do not have to worry about rounds sitting in a magazine for extended periods of time, and even better you do not have to worry about bullet set back when you are loading and unloading between range trips. At the range you do not have to chase brass. The longer I shoot, the more I appreciate this feature. Just dump the brass into your container and you are done. Also it is easier to to train with a revolver. I find it very helpful to skip load inorder to stay away from that dreaded flinch. Have you ever tried skip loading an auto?

So this is not a auto VS wheelgun thread I just thought some might feel the same way about wheel guns as I do. I know I have my eye out for another 686 this one with a 4" barrel :) . later Juan.

I love autos, but have no great affection for 1911s. I'd rather have a DA or DAO for training purposes 'cause I carry revolvers and autos. I don't want to get into some sort of training vaporlock if the stuff goes down. Just pull the trigger. Plus, I don't care a whole lot for condition one.

I will never shake my affection for revolvers. I don't really feel I need to carry anything else, but I do have a couple of pet autos. I love my Rugers, especially my P90. And, my little Kel Tech is a revolver with a slide. The trigger feels like a very smooth revolver. Makes cross training easy.

That's just sorta how I've gone about it. Everyone has different preferences and different tastes. Some hate plastic. Not me, I like high tech. But, my revolvers outnumber my autos. I only have one carry revolver, though, and I have several autos I'll carry. My primary carry is the Kel Tech or the Taurus .38 Special Ultra Lite. I may wind up with one of my Rugers, P90 or P85 on any given winter day. Summer, it's the Taurus or the Kel Tech with a NAA in my pocket for the heck of it.
 
In a word, yes.

For many years all my handguns were autos. That is until one day, not too long ago, I spotted a S&W 629 Classic 6 1/2" in the glass case at a local gun shop. It came home with me that day.

I now own five wheel guns and still looking. The obsession seems to be escalating at an alarming rate. :rolleyes:
 
I once had seven semi-autos and one wheel gun. Now I have four wheel guns and three semi-autos. I like the lower maintence requirements of wheel guns and prefer the way they look. I will be getting another auto or two to justify the gunless mags I have. Other than that, I have decided my new hobby is collecting S&W wheel guns. The best part of it is that used wheel guns are alot cheaper than used semi-autos.
 
With me, it's not a question of revolver/autoloader so much as it is a question of single vs. double action. I've discovered that I really prefer single action designs. Thus, I am a big fan of single action revolvers, and a big fan of single action autopistols. Over time, I have shifted away from Glocks, SIGs, etc., and now use 1911's almost exclusively. For CCW use, my preference evolved over time from a SIG to a Glock to an LDA-equipped 1911 to a traditional cocked-and-locked single action 1911. On the wheelgun side, I have more than a dozen revolvers, all of which are single action.

That said, I think I am about to buy my first DA revolver. My wife has finally decided that she wants to be armed. She'll be taking a CCW class soon. I have a Glock 26 (9mm) that I used to carry and have been saving for this day. She likes it, but I'm leaning toward getting her a S&W 642 (hammerless 2" .38), also, and letting her decide what works better for her. The revolver is just as small, lighter, and is much less likely to jam from things like limp-wristing or being fired from inside a purse or pocket.
 
When I go through my safe, I find four autos -- one is a Ruger Standard Model MK II, and the other three are M1911s. My carry gun is an M1911, but sometimes I drop a Colt Detective Special in my pocket as I'm going out the door.

I like revolvers for a lot of reasons, but the M1911 is the gun I want when I'm suddenly confronted in a parking lot or a dark alley.
 
My first, and one-and-only revolver from 1993-2001 was a 1993 Colt Anaconda 6" in 44 Mag. I've always had, loved, and favored shooting autos, but my revolver collection is gaining. In 2001 I bought a Colt Python Elite that I've always wanted, but this last year I've also added a Colt Detective Special, Ruger Vaquero .357, and a S&W 617. I really enjoy my revolvers and have more of an appreciation for them, but my autos will always be my favorite ones to shoot (preferably my 1911s AND my two Glocks).
 
I own three autos and nine revolvers. As a cop I carry my Sig on duty and sometimes off duty. But my backup is a revolver and, more often then not, it's what I carry when I'm off duty.

I learned how to shoot on revolvers and then, like so many others, I became an auto freak. It was the late 80's and early 90's and all the cool people used a semi. A few years ago I rediscovered the joy of wheelguns. I'm getting older (37) and I guess I've matured a little bit. Wheelguns are fun and I've become a fair shot with them. I no longer feel that if I don't have at least 30 rounds with me I'm outgunned. Actually my Sig is a 45 so I guess that I've gone the same way with autos as well.
 
When I was younger I had a 1911 phase but it passed. I still like the looks of a 1911 but I prefer revolvers, there's just something about the look and feel of a SAA or a S&W 19.
 
The obsession changes over time!

At this point in time I actually have equal numbers of revos and autos. My obsessions with one or the other changes in emphasis over time. Right now I am really passionate about getting another revolver but I know that, in the future, I am likely to obsess over a particular auto. I think it is a kind of schizophrenia:what:
 
By and large, autos make me yawn. Wheelguns make me smile. Wheelguns that load with a lever do, too, until cleaning time comes 'round.

But as an effective tool (e.g. CCW), an auto is a good choice. It's just not the most intriguing toy, to me. Maybe I need to get into competition or something. But trapshooting takes enough of my money.:)
 
I am about even on both types.I hunt with a revolver,the one exception being a Ruger 22/45 that shoots like it has eyes.But all my revolvers are big-bores,and I am proficient,not perfect with anything I own.
 
I examined the way I shoot. I take an extra fraction of time to sight in each shot. With my slower rate of fire, I benifit from each shot being more powerful and well placed... meaning I benifit from using revolvers with more powerful loads than your average automatic cartridge.
 
I've gone the opposite direction. Arthritic hands are making it too tough for me to absorb the shock of anything other than heavy wheelguns. I did have 5 revolvers and 5 semis. Now I have 2 revolvers and 5 semis.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top