Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Anybody hunted with .40 S&W??

Discussion in 'Hunting' started by camoman33935, Mar 24, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. camoman33935

    camoman33935 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2008
    Messages:
    326
    Location:
    SW Florida
    i was just wonderin if anybody has had success hunting with a .40 S&W, particularly on small hogs (20-80lbs) and deer. I already have a .357 Mag and it works pretty good if i do my part. Im tryin to decide what handgun to get next. it's a tossup between either a Glock 22 and a Ruger Redhawk. let me know what yall think

    thanks
     
  2. Bula

    Bula Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2006
    Messages:
    914
    Location:
    Scottsdale, AZ
    A .40 would probably be ok on smaller pigs and smallish deer, but the redhawk would be a HUGELY better platform for a handgun that may be used to hunt. In my opinion, the G22 platform is much better suited for defensive situatuation. Now a model 20 with adjustable sights would be a whole different story. I'm partial to bigger calibers in wheel guns because you'll second guess yourself a whole lot less when you are hunting with a 44 mag or 45 colt. That and I can shoot a pie plate at 75 yd with a .44 mag pretty easily, i'd be hard pressed to do that with a model 22.
     
  3. camoman33935

    camoman33935 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2008
    Messages:
    326
    Location:
    SW Florida
    why would you reccomend the 10mm Glock?
     
  4. sharkhunter2018

    sharkhunter2018 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2007
    Messages:
    601
    Location:
    m-burg, va
    IIRC, someone on here took a hog with a G20.
     
  5. Bula

    Bula Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2006
    Messages:
    914
    Location:
    Scottsdale, AZ
    camoman, the 10mm can is capable of some very impressive velocities (from an everyday autoloader)look at some of the double tap offerings, 180 gr pills at 1330 fps! 200 grainers at 1250, that'll do the trick. I'd still vote for the Redhawk in 44 mag or 45 colt over any auto for hunting.
     
  6. MCgunner

    MCgunner Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2005
    Messages:
    24,960
    Location:
    The end of the road between Sodom and Gomorrah Tex
    I'd use the 10 if it had the accuracy. .40, not so much. I'd do okay under 50 yards on small hogs like that, but would be a rainbow at 75 yards or beyond. Give me the Redhawk in .44 mag and I'd be a lot happier. Then, I wouldn't have a problem on a 200 lber.
     
  7. Inspector3711

    Inspector3711 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2008
    Messages:
    83
    Location:
    Puget Sound Area
    The .40 isn't too much different from the 9MM. I carry a .40 in the woods in black bear country and just hope that 16+1 is enough.

    I'm planning to purchase an EAA Witness Elite Match in 10MM which will replace the .40 in this role. The 10MM can be loaded to .357 magnum levels and, with the right bullet/powder can approach .41 magnum energy. The Witness Elite Match has a 15+1 round capacity.

    Many consider the 10MM as the lowest semi auto pistol round that is adequate for hunting.
     
  8. Big Daddy Grim

    Big Daddy Grim Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2008
    Messages:
    618
    Location:
    Idaho
    I took a boar with a 10mm my Dan Wesson damn thing was at the base of a little nole and I am to damn big to climb a tree. We were hunting them but not at night while trying to pee.
     
  9. usmc1371

    usmc1371 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2009
    Messages:
    481
    Location:
    Portland OR
    Killed a coyote at 37 yds with my glock 35 180g gold dot through the front shoulders. Combo of dummest coyote ever and lucky shot from the drivers seat of my ranger. I ranged the truck from where the dog was laying just for kicks. Its funny how diffrent the hole is from a 180g .40cal compared to a 180g 30cal 300wm. The forty almost seems to "nice''. I would have rather had my .44 blackhawk.
     
  10. JShirley

    JShirley Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2002
    Messages:
    20,843
    Location:
    Atlanta
    I put down a tough buck with a 155-grain XTP from a Glock 23 at about 25 meters. CNS shot, just underneath the jaw. Instant fold.

    I'd be okay with shooting a very close deer with sturdy .40, but would much prefer a much heavier bullet (.41, .429, or .45) or a rifle.

    John
     
  11. brandonc

    brandonc Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2008
    Messages:
    41
    Location:
    Arizona
    .40 S&W is very popular for javelina (30-60lbs) hunting here, in fact it is more than enough.
     
  12. JuryRig

    JuryRig Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2006
    Messages:
    51
    Location:
    Eburg, WA
    For grouse, yes. Anything bigger calls for the G20 or .44 Blackhawk.
     
  13. lgbloader

    lgbloader Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2008
    Messages:
    1,548
    Location:
    LGB
    Nope.

    LGB
     
  14. SomeDude

    SomeDude Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2008
    Messages:
    127
    Location:
    St. Louis Metro
    I saw a video on YouTube where a guy was using a Hi-Point Carbine to hunt coyotes. Don't know if it was a 9mm or .40 but it got the job done.
     
  15. kyle1974

    kyle1974 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2009
    Messages:
    348
    Location:
    Houston Texas
    I've shot a few pigs under 100lbs with my springfield .40, but it was only because I was carrying it, and took an opportunistic shot. I wouldn't call it a "hunting pistol"
     
  16. mbt2001

    mbt2001 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2005
    Messages:
    2,902
    Location:
    Texas
    .40 Smith and Wesson works on deer and hogs, I wouldn't say it was ideal. For instance, if my car broke down on highway to no where, I could put some meat in the bag with a 9mm or .40. If I was out hunting and particularly had a good rig for the g22 I would carry it as a sidearm. But as a primary hunting round, it just doesn't impress me.

    Yes, when PRESSED into service it would work, BUT...

    The Redhawk in 44 mag is just an ORDER above the .40 smith. 10mm is kind of like a .357 with a slightly larger bullet, so between a .357 and 41 magnum.
     
  17. rcmodel

    rcmodel Member in memoriam

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2007
    Messages:
    59,082
    Location:
    Eastern KS
    Check you state game laws first.

    The .40 S&W is not legal for hunting game animals in some states.

    Like Kansas for instance.

    rc
     
  18. camoman33935

    camoman33935 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2008
    Messages:
    326
    Location:
    SW Florida
    down here in FL everything, except for rimfire, is okay to use for deer. On hogs, you can use anything you want.
     
    Last edited: Apr 22, 2009
  19. memphisjim

    memphisjim Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2008
    Messages:
    1,265
    i say glock 20 as well for 2009 they introduced a 20sf of small frame but you can get a 6 inch barrel to further increase velocity
     
  20. Cpt. America

    Cpt. America Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2009
    Messages:
    330
    Location:
    Florida
    I would not plan on hunting with a .40 S&W. If you plan on hunting small hogs you may also want to plan on ticking off momma pig to and she's gonna laugh that .40 off while she's tusk'n you up. I wouldn't even carry a .40 for a backup against hogs let alone attempt to hunt them with it. I carry a .357 mag Taurus 66 with a 6" Barrel loaded with Hornady Leverlution for a backup. Get the Ruger and don't think twice. The .40 was made for self defense not hunting.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page