Ark Paul,
Nope, what YOU have to realize is that, with all due respect, you don't know what you're talking about.
In 20 years of writing professionally as a freelancer that have included sales to four different gun publication companies, I have never been told up front what to write by an editor or a company regarding the content of product reviews.
No editor has ever come to me and said, "We need something nice about X or Y Company, write it up that way." If it works, it gets written up, if it doesn't, it doesn't.
Only once, in all of those 20 years, did a particular company (where I'd covered at least ten of their guns previously) tell me they didn't want the test results I got to appear in the write-up. That article was immediately cancelled by me, the editor who'd approved it on my initial query agreed, and the company president was informed there'd be no more coverage in future from me.
My checks come from publishing companies, not advertisers, and the material I write is done for you, not advertisers.
Your statement is overly broad, totally unfounded, and bears as much relation to reality as me saying "You have to realize that most statements made on Internet gun forums by people named Paul are written by drivelling idiots."
Buy or don't buy, read or don't read, either way works for me.
Seems like twice a year this gun mag subject comes up, and these uninformed and erroneous statements get a little old.
Denis