Anyone fall "out of love" with 1911's?

Status
Not open for further replies.
NO. I love the 1911. They feel like Browning used my hand when he designed the thing.

I've read about how finicky, etc. they are but I haven't seen it. They just work every time, all the time. The only annoying thing about them is chasing down the fired brass but that's with any auto loader.

I own some plastic fantastics also but accuracy wise none of then will hang with the 1911s or fit my hand as well as they do. The only handgun that I own that will hang with them shooting little groups is a Dan Wesson revolver. They even beat the S&W revolvers that I own or have owned.
 
Personally the 1911 is just not my cup of tea. I've only had 2 of them.... Got rid of them because I found others that work better for me.
 
First of all, guns do not get lonely.

My first handgun was a Detonics Combat Master, in 1982 or 1983. Yes, a strange choice, looking back, but it seemed logical enough at the time. It was too unreliable to carry, but it was a fun gun.

In 1991, I sold my finicky Stainless Commander, the second one I had tried. I also sold a full-sized SAI and a Colt Ace, totally divesting myself of 1911 pistols, and bought a SIG P220, which I used for duty, carry, and home defense. I also had revolvers, which I never stopped using, but the SIG was my only auto pistol for a couple of years.

I felt drawn to the 1911, however, and soon had a Colt Government Model, which was quite reliable. In 1997 I bought a pair of base-model Kimbers, and later a Stainless Gold Match and three Les Baers. I used 1911 pistols for all purposes until 2002, except of course, I kept a J-frame for concealed back-up, and few larger revolvers for occasional general recreation and utility.

In 2002, I finally joined the polymer crowd for duty and carry, but kept my favorite 1911, a Les Baer Thunder Ranch Special. (I switched again, to my present duty/carry P229R DAK, on 2004.)

It was not a matter of being "in love" with the 1911, as much as appreciating my high accuracy potential with a good 1911, that prompted me to keep my most accurate specimen of the breed. As my right wrist and both hands get older, and ache with every .40 shot I fire from my duty SIG P229, however, I appreciate the 1911's lack of snappiness during recoil, which is due to the all-steel construction, the design of the grip, the low bore axis, and the gentler acceleration of the .45 ACP. I have stopped wearing my P229 anywhere but at work, where I must still tote a .40 duty pistol.

For concealed carry, I now usually tote either my Baer TRS on my right hip, or a Glock G17 on my left hip. (I wear a small revolver on my right side when I carry the G17 on the left, in case I reach for my right hip in an emergency, due to conditioned reflex.)

While it may be ideal to stick to one pistol, and become excellent with it, my hands are not built the same, such that Glocks are an excellent lefty choice, while the 1911 is an excellent right-hand choice. I am fairly ambidextrous, though a bit more left-handed, but elected to carry on my right hip, nearly thirty years ago. I reckon a 1911 will remain part of my defensive battery, until the gentle .45 ACP recoil becomes just too much for my right hand.
 
Last edited:
I have been blessed with many pistols an while I doubt I will ever totally divest myself from the 1911 I do believe I will reduce it to just a couple. Right now my intent is to keep a Kimber Pro Raptor and a Para limited P12.
I've done the Colts, Springfields, Kimbers, Para's in multiple variations and just can't get it despite what Col. Cooper said.
 
Took out my only 1911 last night to measure it for a display case I want for it. Nope, still love it and want more.
 
Not yet, but I'm still young.

I seem to go in phases every couple months. Occasionally its 1911's, then little bitty compact 9's and 40's, then full size guns, then back to 1911's... etc.
 
It depends on what you use them for. As far as a carry, they are generally too heavy and too expensive for a reliable 1911. I can buy 3 Glocks for the same price and have all of the bases covered, Same goes for M&P, XD's, Or FN's. I don't carry guns over a 1000 dollars for HD. I also require more rounds in my mag, so I don't need to carry 3 mags with me. A Glock 19 or 26 with 1 spare "glock 19 mag", as a reload works fine. If you need more than that you are in deep stuff.
I still enjoy shooting a 1911 for fun, but with prices for ammo at $1 a round, I am out for now.
Spoke to the owner of local ACE hardware store, and he can't get ammo, "has a gun section". Said Jacksonville is full of ammo, maybe worth a ride from South FL to pick some up. I told him I would split the cost on a dozen cases.
We can't afford to shoot at a dollar a round for 223 and 45.
Guns like cars run hot and cold. In time the 1911 phase will die down also. Then you can score a nice range gun, as other guns are reasonable. Life runs in cycles, same with cars guns and everything else. If you want a self defense gun, a polymer reliable gun with 15-20 rounds is a better way to roll. Two mags and you are ready for a small detachment, as long as you avoid being shot.
Watch for revolvers to make a comeback.
 
I haven't.

I've sold off a few but I still have my eleven year old Springfield Loaded which has yet to miss a beat. It still gets range time but isn't carried any longer.

I doubt I'll ever get rid of it as long as I can continue to shoot it.
 
I like 1911s as target guns but the manual safety is a 'unnecessary' complication off the range IMO. I've dwindled my 1911s down to one DW Specialist and although I appreciate a fine design and won't part with it. I have absolutely no desire to buy another 1911.
 
Last edited:
Accuracy sucks on the best 1911's compared with Glocks, M&P's, Sigs, etc

will Glock's and M&P's shoot under 3" at 50y's?.....i don't own any of them or have shot any of them.....will they?

manual safety is a 'unnecessary' complication off the range IMO

what is so complicated about pushing your thumb down?????
 
Last edited:
Accuracy sucks on the best 1911's compared with Glocks, M&P's, Sigs, etc
will Glock's and M&P's shoot under 3" at 50y's?.....i don't own any of them or have shot any of them.....will they?

I've owned/own poly guns from Glock, Sig, H&K, and M&P.. There is a reason the "combat accurate" term was coined.. Precision guns they are not nor were they intended to be..

Queue the "I can circumcise a gnat at 20yrds" with my plastic fantastic peeps.

I do find it odd so many bash on price yet there probably the first to rip out the .05 cent stock sights, connectors, triggers, barrels running up a tab in line with some 1911's.
 
Although I love the classic looks of mil-spec 1911s, I never succeeded in falling IN love with them : to actually shoot with, most other makes/models appeal to me more.
 
Accuracy sucks on the best 1911's compared with Glocks, M&P's, Sigs, etc.

Ya gotta love the Internet...it's like the Twilight Zone at times. I have to know in what parallel universe are Glocks, M&Ps, SIGs, etc. more accurate than a 1911?

I have two 1911's that will shoot under 1.5-inch groups at 50 yards. One came with two 10-shot targets done from a Ransom Rest with the LARGEST pattern 1.375-inches. My HK's won't do that. The XDm 5.25 is good for about 1-inch at 25 yards.

Where do you find Glocks, M&Ps and SIGS that shoot better than that?
 
I been there and done that. 1911 was my first love and I still love it. just not in love with 1911's anymore. sort of like my first girlfriend. but some people marry and stay in love with their first girlfriend(1911). id say sell it or trade it on a hk45c. its a lighter more modern design. and its also 1911ish as you can carry it cocked and locked.



Posted from Thehighroad.org App for Android
 
'unnecessary' complication off the range IMO

what is so complicated about pushing your thumb down?????
It's not complicated in itself but it requires muscle memory to operate smooth. Smooth is fast. Fast is smooth. With that in mind I don't care to crosstrain manual of arms when all my carry guns lack a safety.
 
I currently own three 1911s. I have no desire to buy more or sell any. They are about 15% of my handgun inventory, and none of them are carry guns for me. I still enjoy shooting all three, as I have for the last 30+ years.

I still love the look, feel and accuracy of a good 1911. My muscle memory has no trouble making one perform, in spite of all my range time on Glocks. Both have their place, and I'm fortunate to have the ability to own them all.
 
I love 1911's and use to carry them daily. I switched to Glocks a few years back and feel it was the right move for me. I still lust after the 1911 though.

I sweat a lot and live in a humid climate. Rust was always a problem with my 1911s. Even after oiling/greasing them, there was still rust. I decided that I was better off with a pistol that could keep up with me and didn't need to be looked after as much. Glock it was.
 
'unnecessary' complication off the range IMO
what is so complicated about pushing your thumb down?????

We are taking about range time right??? Pick up empty gun, insert mag with gun pointed down range, cycle the slide, fire, fire, fire etc.. remove empty mag, set locked open gun on tray or table.. reload mag, repeat. What is this complication in which you speak?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top