Anyone Regret A CZ Pistol Purchase?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Has anyone ever regretted purchasing a Glock, Colt, Ruger, S&W, FN, Kahr, Taurus, Springfield, etc, etc......I'm sure someone has! Nothing is perfect or works for everyone.
 
I had a Ruger P95 for a little over 2 years and I'd always get 3-4 FTE's out of every 100 rounds. I ended up selling it for about $50 less than I paid and went out and bought a CZ75B. I've put about 4-500 rounds through it without the first problem. Feels great and looks great. It's a little big to carry, but it's my dedicated 9mm range/night stand gun.
 
I PM'd you my experience.

I have owned CZ, Glock, XD, XDm, Taurus (.40 Beretta clone), misc. revolvers, Colts, and a sig. Out of all the pistols i've ever owned, the CZ is the ONE i sold purely because I didn't like it at all.

I've sold others, but more to fund different purchases or because they were redundant (.40 Glock, .40 XDm and .40 taurus) 3 full size 40s? sold the glock.
 
And that is what makes the world go round.

I, for one, don't like a Glock and never really hold on to 1911's.

And I'm just fine if you don't like CZ's. It keeps them oh-but-a-little-cheaper for me.
 
Usually when u have the same person or in this case 2 brothers they probably dont know how to take care of it...i noticed my cz if u put very little oil..i put it on and wipped it mostly off it ran beautifully but if u put to much on it didnt like it
 
The guy I bough mine from regretted it. He's the type though that just constantly buys new guns trying to find more accuracy when he is the real problem. I bought it off of him (CZ75B in .40cal) and have never regretted it. It has been reliable and that is regardless of how it is oiled.
 
I have a regret. I let a 1982 CZ-75 I bought in Germany go. I carried it at times that carrying an issue M1911A1 or another NATO issue handgun would be...inconvenient and carrying a Tok or a Mak would have just been...rude. I also used it to compete in IPSC and Bianchi Cup Europe. Wish I had it back.

Turkey is making their own CZ-75 clone and TriStar imports a compact version known as the C-100. I'm considering one of those since they feel a lot like my old CZ and come with two 13 round magazines.

ECS
 
I have a regret. I let a 1982 CZ-75 I bought in Germany go. I carried it at times that carrying an issue M1911A1 or another NATO issue handgun would be...inconvenient and carrying a Tok or a Mak would have just been...rude. I also used it to compete in IPSC and Bianchi Cup Europe. Wish I had it back.

The first step to recovery is being able to admit that you made a mistake. ;)

The second step is to find a replacement.
 
I have a fondness for the CZ 75 and variations on the theme. I had a CZ 100 that was not very accurate and I hated the trigger pull. That one got sold.

1984 vintage CZ 75, a real pain to get in the country in those days.
f3ru43.jpg

The bulk of the rest of my CZ 75 collection.


2dlkd9k.jpg
 
Can you remember anything about the prices you paid or CZ-75s were going for during those "dark" years? We're having a lengthy discussion on this point elsewhere here on the forum. I bought a pristine CZ-75 in the mid-2000s for about $500, but the original owner (from whom I bought it) paid $900 in the early 80's.
 
I'm not going to say what I paid, although it was near to what Walt paid for his, and it was just last year. I believe a CZ75 short rail in this condition is now a $1500-$2000 pistol.
DSC06114.jpg
[/IMG]
 
Great looking CZ!! That's what they're SUPPOSED TO LOOK LIKE!!

A few years back, CZ came out with a small run of RETRO CZ-75Bs. They looked like the pre-Bs, but were B models internally. That, to me, was the best of both worlds: better looks, no potential parts problems, and a new gun warranty. (The triggers weren't as good as pre-Bs, but could be tuned. They looked right, as the slide-stop, hammer and trigger guard were the old style.)

They don't seem to show up used, anywhere...
 
Last edited:
I didn't even know they existed! I just saw some pics on the CZ forum. CZ missed the boat by not offering a plain, non-anniversary short rail.
 
My Sp-01 is my favorite gun to shoot! Period. Very accurate, good trigger, easy to keep on target - lots of fun. Never had a problem with it. recoil is nearly absent
 
i had a retro 75 B and regrettably sold it but i got 500 bucks for it and thats what i paid minus the accessories i let him have..he was a new shooter looking for a easy to take apart gun and i figured i wanted the new sp-01 so i let it go..that was 4 months ago..i ended up buying my girlfriend an sr9c..dont get me wrong i love it..she loves it but i want my CZ back..i will be getting a new one but it may have to wait a few more months
 
The "short rail" models don't really look all that different than the later ones. CZ apparently went to the longer-railed version after some issues with frames cracking. (They probably changed and improved the metallurgy, too, as time passed.)

CZ-75s (both the pre-Bs and Bs) have been in a slow but constant state of change. They've introduced a number of changes, and brought out a lot of different variants.

I've had a SIG P-210-6; it was a nice gun, and superbly accurate, but there were things about it I didn't like. (Low capacity, sharp edges, hard-to-use mag release, difficult to release safety, so-so sights.) I now have a SIG P226 X-Five that isn't pleasing me all that much.

My next big purchase will probably be one of the top-end CZs for IPSC, like the Tactical Sport, but I may have to sell the X-Five first.
 
The CZ frame cracking is discussed on the CZ forum, and has been attributed to the time frame when CZ farmed out some maufacturing to a Spanish firm (check this link: http://www.ar15.com/archive/topic.html?b=5&f=37&t=118808). The short rail would not appear to have any additional stress areas as a result of the shorter rails; that really isn't where the recoil stress would be delivered to the slide and frame. Thee are many guns out there with WAY less rail contact than a short rail CZ. Metallurgy and design probably have more to do with any stress than rail contact.
 
Can you remember anything about the prices you paid or CZ-75s were going for during those "dark" years? We're having a lengthy discussion on this point elsewhere here on the forum. I bought a pristine CZ-75 in the mid-2000s for about $500, but the original owner (from whom I bought it) paid $900 in the early 80's.

I paid about $275 for mine in the early '80s with three fifteen round magazines. Of course, that was at the Rod & Gun Club in Germany...

ECS
 
I want to clarify something about all the CZ's I've owned. They all had 'issues' that needed resolving, from FTE issues to a launched firing pin and defective magazines. Despite all the various quirks, I still love every one of them once the secret was discovered. No regrets.

I had the opportunity to shoot a P01 today with a fiber optic sight and lighter hammer spring. Suddenly my Kahr K9 is looking a bit pale.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top