Treo
member
I love the smell of internet testosterone in the morning......
It smells like....
It smells like....
Last edited by a moderator:
Why is the principle considered by some to be inapplicable to human self-defense?
What exactly did you say to him after you displayed the weapon? Can you quote it as best you remember? (minus the full spell of any French words)
But if you're right in thinking that the pushy beggar is deserving of getting shot in the future for doing the same thing he did to you, then it would seem that you had an opportunity to do it yourself. Kind of a contradiction.
I don't think it's very nice to wish for something like that unless you know that the guy was an assaulter
as far as brandishing, i don't think there are any statutes defining that as a crime. any local ordinances must comply with commonwealth law in PA. if a DA wanted to charge me, i could get disorderly conduct, maybe terroristic threatening, if the DA was out for blood.
OK, I'm going through the thread and editing the "French" now.
Using punctuation and relevant letters to get around the language filters is a no-no at THR.
In Colorado the standard for lethal force is reasonable fear of life or grievous bodily injury. I really think I'd have a hard time justifying that in this situation.
Look guys here's my point, right wrong or indifferent the BG didn't do anything to justify deadly force.
I'm curious Jah, what would you have done if this ( based on the available information) unarmed man had chosen to continue his advance? You already showed him your hole card and it wasn't enough what then?
I know it didn't happen to you this time but it can and does every day.
I still think a non lethal option would have been better. Would you rather explain to a jury why you bear sprayed a guy or why you shot him?
You have a homeless man, a weaponless ( you can't prove otherwise at this point) homeless man 20 feet from your vehicle...
He didn't threaten you , as a matter of fact you threatened him.
Presentation of Deadly Force, which is what the poster of this thread did, is not Deadly Force. It is the step below deadly force and I would say that it is a very effective form of less than lethal force.
treo said:I still think a non lethal option would have been better. Would you rather explain to a jury why you bear sprayed a guy or why you shot him?