Ar-15 as handy as a shotgun?

Status
Not open for further replies.
The beretta is a pistol-caliber carbine, which means you're getting pistol performance with the stability of a stock, as opposed to rifle or shotgun performance. It's like having a martial art's match where the AR is Jet Li, the shotgun is Jason Statham, and the PCC is David Spade.


Wow.
What a complete and total load of pure crap!
Come stand in front of it for me and I'll bet you'll change your tune.
There is a REASON why the HK MP5 for example is still popular to this day.
And it has nothing to do with full-auto either since it has single shot mode as well and is often employed that way.
Plus, you get added velocity from the longer barrel than you do with the same round from a pistol, and 30 rounds of stable firepower to go with it.

For that matter, 9mm pistols alone have been used for HD for decades as well....and you don't see people like you and your erroneous opinions complaining about that now do ya?

You've been watching too many Kung-foooey movies or something.....lol
:rolleyes:

"No offense" as you put it...but anybody who thinks PCCs suck for HD doesn't know the first thing about them first hand at all other than what you may have read on the interwebzzz from other people who don't know anything about them either. :banghead:
 
Last edited:
As was said, define "handy." Take an AR to a skeet shoot. Or, take a shotgun (with shot) to hunt deer at 150yards.
 
Handy comes down to training. Especially when talking matters of life and death. You never use equipment until your familiar with it and the same should apply to your defensive tools along with planning. Arguing barrel sizes and heft of either is moot without training. You can train to shoot an AR reflexively and have a pair of rounds on target faster than a pair of shells from a shotgun, with practice. You can have a semi-auto shotgun and have a pair of shells on target just as fast as a pair of bullets from an AR. It comes down to preference and practice. To do either well requiures familiarity. Then it comes down to ballistics, "well shotguns leave 9 wound channels, AR's can do this and this..." If a shotgun is where your faith is, then use the shotgun, if an AR is your brand of whiskey, grab the black gun.
 
CSC - One hell of a first post, and I couldn't agree with you more.

You'd be surprised at how fast a pump can be done too.. I think I've seen 8 hand thrown clays busted with a pump shotgun, of course in the air. I'll NEVER be that good.. hell, my only shotgun right now is a single shot. correction, 7.. and he definitely was pointing .. he was shooting from the hip ;)
 
CSC - One hell of a first post, and I couldn't agree with you more.

You'd be surprised at how fast a pump can be done too.. I think I've seen 8 hand thrown clays busted with a pump shotgun, of course in the air. I'll NEVER be that good.. hell, my only shotgun right now is a single shot. correction, 7.. and he definitely was pointing .. he was shooting from the hip ;)

Tom Knapp has done 10 with a semi, I think, and 7-8 with a pump
 
It's up to 10 with a maxxis I believe now.. its insane.

Tom Knapp is using benelli's... maybe it was fastest shots out of a maxxis.. been a while since I could find the video ... tyring now.

Found the video .. its a winchester.. dunno where the browning is comming from.
 
Last edited:
Interesting convo indeed....

I'll "point" a shotgun or "aim" an AR with the common goal of hitting my intended target. Both are "handy". Either way, practice makes better :)
 
hell, at the distances I would be shooting in my house (no room is bigger than 12 ft, the hallway is maybe 15 ft.. from end to end.. probably 50ft at best.. longest shot possible. At that distance.. I'm not aiming anything but a handgun. No need for sights on an AR at that distance either.. I'll keep 90 % of my shots in the COM...

In my house.. I'd rather have my handguns.. they point well enough to keep it com at across the room distance that I don't need sights much on them. Might not be kill shots.. but at the same time.. I should be able to hit and slow him down a hair.
 
If a shotgun is where your faith is, then use the shotgun, if an AR is your brand of whiskey, grab the black gun.

This.

Choose either and practice for what will likely never happen.
 
Wow.
What a complete and total load of pure crap!
Come stand in front of it for me and I'll bet you'll change your tune.
There is a REASON why the HK MP5 for example is still popular to this day.
And it has nothing to do with full-auto either since it has single shot mode as well and is often employed that way.
Plus, you get added velocity from the longer barrel than you do with the same round from a pistol, and 30 rounds of stable firepower to go with it.

For that matter, 9mm pistols alone have been used for HD for decades as well....and you don't see people like you and your erroneous opinions complaining about that now do ya?

You've been watching too many Kung-foooey movies or something.....lol


"No offense" as you put it...but anybody who thinks PCCs suck for HD doesn't know the first thing about them first hand at all other than what you may have read on the interwebzzz from other people who don't know anything about them either.

You obviously missed my sig. I won't stand in front of a PCC , but if I have the choice between a PCC, shotgun, or rifle, the PCC is going to be a distant third. I'm not saying that PCCs won't do the job, but they don't do it any better than a rifle or shotgun, for reasons I believe I've stated earlier in this thread.

A 9mm pistol (or pistol caliber carbine) will poke a 9mm hole through the target. It's lack of velocity has two very important effects. It does have increased velocity compared with a pistol, but because those cartridges are designed for short barrels, you don't get that much in a longer barrel. Even a .357 magnum in a lever action doesn't reach nearly the speeds of a rifle round. Those two important effects I mentioned are:
1) It does not reach the velocity required to cause damage with the cavitation effect. All of the damage done with a pistol is simply the bullet crushing tissue as it passes through. With a rifle, like a .223, the damage is both from the bullet passing through, and from the tearing of tissue from the resulting shockwave. The shockwave still occurs with a pistol round, it's just that at the lower velocity the tissue doesn't stretch beyond the elastic point. Thus, you get a much bigger hole with a .223 than you will with a 9mm. This isn't just information on the interwebz, it's corroberated by real-life use and by gel reports.
2) With the lower velocity, bullet engineers cannot control how the bullet expands. With a JHP 9mm round, if it misses the target and goes through a wall, or if it hits a target with heavy clothing, it could clog up with dry material and fail to expand and function like a ball round, complete with a thinner wound channel and MORE overpenetration.

Thus, for two of the biggest considerations for HD - those being "will it stop a target?" and "will it kill my neighbor?", the advantage goes to a rifle.

The MP5 is still popular, but not nearly as popular as it once was. SWAT teams and special forces are largely phasing out the MP5 for the M4 or similar carbines. The MP5SD is a different animal. If you want stealth, you want subsonic. When you go subsonic, you want a fat, heavy bullet, because you lose all the benefit you would have had with a rifle cartridge (it is impossible to be under the speed of sound and over 2000 FPS at the same time).

A lot of what you said about the MP5 (or a civilian 30-round PCC) applies to an AR. A non-NFA PCC and rifle will have very similar features, including size, layout, capacity, and aftermarket modifications available. Granted, the PCC will be slightly smaller, and the recoil will be slightly less. But the recoil of the .223 is negligable at worst, and the small size difference is a huge tradeoff when you consider the difference in wound tract and overpenetration mentioned above.

So no, I'm not full of crap. I didn't say they sucked, they'll do the job, and they'll do it better than a pistol. But a rifle offers all the benefits, plus a lot more. If all you have is a PCC, it'll work, and it'll work well. But if you're picking a gun specifically for HD, unless you really need the smaller package, a rifle is much more suited to the task.

It's like when you're buying ketchup. Yeah, Hunts is still ketchup, but it aint Heinz.
 
Wow. Has this thread ever gotten off topic.

How does a post discussing the similarities of the overall length of a 20" barreled AR and an 18" barreled shotgun devolve into this mess?

12 ga is 12 ga.
AR-15 is AR-15.
Apples to Oranges.

A 20" inch AR is as long as an 18" barreled shotgun. Isn't that interesting?
 
Walking Arsenal... I think there are too many variables to call it that black and white on the length comparison... I prefer a shorter than stock buttstock on my shotguns... I usually lop off 1" to get a proper fit. Action length and stock length come into play for both...

With a similar length stock on the AR and shotgun, I'd actually expect the shotgun to be shorter. Are the actions really that long on them to be longer than an AR's action?? Dont own an AR to check, don't own a repeating shotgun for comparison either. Someone got a pic handy to do a comparison of a mossy 500 action vs. an AR action vs. a SBEII action vs. an 870 express action?
 
No offense, but some of you guys are crackin' me up with this "you don't have to aim a shotgun...or it spreads at close range" stuff.
Nothing could be farther from the truth!
Can't know for sure who you are referencing, but since you included my post, perhaps it was me. Sure hope I'm not the one your are citing though. I said, 'you can be less precise'. I am well aware that the lore of shotguns just spraying pellets is false, and I chose my words properly. 'Less precise' is exactly accurate. Perhaps you just read it again?
B
 
I guess how much less precise depends on the load/setup you are running.

Here is my "scattergun" pattern from ~8 yards. Not a whole lot of room to be less precise.

d2d173f7.gif
 
you could shift that 3" in any direction and still be pretty deadly... you'd have to be slightly (and I mean that.. not much.. depends on when you stop shooting) more picky about placement with a handgun. I'd prefer a carbine or handgun to a shotgun though.
 
You obviously missed my sig. I won't stand in front of a PCC , but if I have the choice between a PCC, shotgun, or rifle, the PCC is going to be a distant third. I'm not saying that PCCs won't do the job, but they don't do it any better than a rifle or shotgun, for reasons I believe I've stated earlier in this thread.

A 9mm pistol (or pistol caliber carbine) will poke a 9mm hole through the target. It's lack of velocity has two very important effects. It does have increased velocity compared with a pistol, but because those cartridges are designed for short barrels, you don't get that much in a longer barrel. Even a .357 magnum in a lever action doesn't reach nearly the speeds of a rifle round. Those two important effects I mentioned are:
1) It does not reach the velocity required to cause damage with the cavitation effect. All of the damage done with a pistol is simply the bullet crushing tissue as it passes through. With a rifle, like a .223, the damage is both from the bullet passing through, and from the tearing of tissue from the resulting shockwave. The shockwave still occurs with a pistol round, it's just that at the lower velocity the tissue doesn't stretch beyond the elastic point. Thus, you get a much bigger hole with a .223 than you will with a 9mm. This isn't just information on the interwebz, it's corroberated by real-life use and by gel reports.
2) With the lower velocity, bullet engineers cannot control how the bullet expands. With a JHP 9mm round, if it misses the target and goes through a wall, or if it hits a target with heavy clothing, it could clog up with dry material and fail to expand and function like a ball round, complete with a thinner wound channel and MORE overpenetration.

Thus, for two of the biggest considerations for HD - those being "will it stop a target?" and "will it kill my neighbor?", the advantage goes to a rifle.

The MP5 is still popular, but not nearly as popular as it once was. SWAT teams and special forces are largely phasing out the MP5 for the M4 or similar carbines. The MP5SD is a different animal. If you want stealth, you want subsonic. When you go subsonic, you want a fat, heavy bullet, because you lose all the benefit you would have had with a rifle cartridge (it is impossible to be under the speed of sound and over 2000 FPS at the same time).

A lot of what you said about the MP5 (or a civilian 30-round PCC) applies to an AR. A non-NFA PCC and rifle will have very similar features, including size, layout, capacity, and aftermarket modifications available. Granted, the PCC will be slightly smaller, and the recoil will be slightly less. But the recoil of the .223 is negligable at worst, and the small size difference is a huge tradeoff when you consider the difference in wound tract and overpenetration mentioned above.

So no, I'm not full of crap. I didn't say they sucked, they'll do the job, and they'll do it better than a pistol. But a rifle offers all the benefits, plus a lot more. If all you have is a PCC, it'll work, and it'll work well. But if you're picking a gun specifically for HD, unless you really need the smaller package, a rifle is much more suited to the task.

It's like when you're buying ketchup. Yeah, Hunts is still ketchup, but it aint Heinz.


Sorry, but yep, you're full of crap dude on this one.
:D

I already own an AK as shown in my pic, and also owned a Benelli M3Super90 for almost 10 years. Likewise served in Ordnance and shot A2s and M4s for 20years in the army. So I do have experience with these platforms.

"TRUE" that a shotgun and an AR both have more "power" than a 9mm PCC at close range.
I agree.
Stretch that out a little and the shotgun is out of the running already unless you load slugs too.
But hell man, I could equally say that the 50cal Browning Ma Deuce that I was a trainer on has more power than ALL of them combined.
But "so what?"

You need to understand however that the shotgun and the AR both have limitations too. ESPECIALLY in a HD scenario.

If your plan is to sit still in one room, not move at all, and HOPE that your shotgun or carbine happens to be in there with you at the time...then fine.

But I already know first hand that maneuvering through rooms and down tight hallways is MUCH easier with a 29 1/2" PCC than my AK, an AR or a shotgun either. And much more accurate than a handgun. Also with less recoil and faster follow-up shots than any and every gun mentioned so far.

The point of this thread is what would be more "handy."
A shotgun or an AR?
My answer is still "neither."
Same reason the AK isn't my "first" choice either.

A 9mm PCC, or 40cal or 45acp PCC for that matter, loaded with 30 rounds of quality HPs will still kill a bad guy dead with ease. And...do it at close range in a much smaller package with less recoil and faster follow-up shots. It's been proved time and time again.

So, I'm not following your point at all.
Is your point that a shotgun with it's extremely low capacity by comparison and limited range and slow reloads and massive recoil and much longer length...or an AR will kill somebody "deader" than already dead?

Yep..."this time"...you're still full of it.
:neener:


Oh yeah.....as for your martial arts example...
Bruce Lee only weighed in at 130lbs when he started out, and could easily whip all 3 of your guys.
Don't discount the lil guy.
:D
 
Last edited:
Can't know for sure who you are referencing, but since you included my post, perhaps it was me. Sure hope I'm not the one your are citing though. I said, 'you can be less precise'. I am well aware that the lore of shotguns just spraying pellets is false, and I chose my words properly. 'Less precise' is exactly accurate. Perhaps you just read it again?
B

Nope. Not directed at you specifically.
Just mentioning across the board that at close range a shotgun practically does not spread at all.
Sorry for the confusion there.
 
I guess how much less precise depends on the load/setup you are running.

Here is my "scattergun" pattern from ~8 yards. Not a whole lot of room to be less precise.

d2d173f7.gif

Yep. Exactly.
I don't think I can even shoot 24 feet in my house.
So closer would be an even tighter pattern.
 
Seems the OP is extolling the virtues of the 20in AR----which I find extremely clunky with what is offered these days----that might be different if the SP1 configuration were still available.

I have 3 long guns that share HD duties--a 930 SPX---a 6920 and a Mini-30-----I trade them out from behind the bedroom door to the safe on a whim and am confident any one of them will do the trick if called upon.

The only thing constant is the pistol.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top