Ragnar Danneskjold
Member
"THAT" is the problem. You DON'T realize that this is a totally different universe. Not everybody buys a pistol to train for the gunfight that never happens. Some of us actually USE them for other things.
If "Statement A" is claimed to be true all of the time, and an instance can be found were "Statement A" is not true, than the claim has been successfully refuted.
The initial post of the thread is claiming that revolvers are better than autos. It does not say "in some instances that are not related to gunfighting". It just says "better".
That's the premise. That's "Statement A". And an instance has been found where that premise is wrong, ie: actual gun fighting in combat. Therefore to answer the question "are revolvers actually better than autos?" is...NO there are some instances where revolvers might be preferred, and some instances where autos might be preferred. One or the other is not better for everything.
<sarcasm>
\Logic
\\How does it work?
</sarcasm>
Also, why are you so angry? Do you need someone to talk to, maybe vent about some things going on that are heating you up. Despite memes to the contrary, the internet is not serious business.
Last edited: