Armalite has a Question: Metal or Polymer?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I too would prefer a decocker without a safety. My first modern autoloader was a P89 with that configuration, and next to the Glock system it is still the one I prefer.
 
Instead of steel, or polymer, perhaps a frame in Anodized aluminum (Light & strong). If you could get a pistol like that in .40 with a 12 rd. mag capacity, I'd be on it!!!!
 
I too would prefer a decocker without a safety. My first modern autoloader was a P89 with that configuration, and next to the Glock system it is still the one I prefer.

Sounds like you'd like a CZ-75BD. Decocker on the frame, no safety. Not really popular with the CZ purists. The ones I've seen at gunshows have been about $50-75 cheaper than CZ-75Bs and they weren't moving.:scrutiny:
 
The Sarsilmaz K2 model in one of my previous posts does have a decocker, so the option is there for Armalite to do. I suspect it would remain on the slide though.

GR
 
i always likes the full length dust cover like the baby eagle over the CZ/EAA pattern. but i would have to vote steel too!
 
I don't own a CZ, but I'd vote for the metal. The one I handled felt like a real "shooting iron". :)

I think the polymer framed guns is a tough category to compete in with more coming each day, i.e. S&W, Kimber, etc.
 
If there is going to be a 10mm version, then I demand equal time for the 9x23mm!

If there is going to be a 9x23mm version, then they might as well make a .38 Super also.

Now for something completely different. Bring out a lengthened frame for the 7.62 Tokarev cartridge. Then, reloaders from the dark side could have a field day loading their 9x23s and 10mms out another 2mms.:scrutiny:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top