I'm seeing the hypocrisy meter here pegged, while the maturity gauge is barely registering a reading.
You would enjoy seeing any group of people using our childrens' artwork for their purposes -- especially if we were virulently opposed to that group? It cuts both ways, gentlemen (and at this point, I use the term loosely). I guess if some anti-gun organization (or perhaps, even the government) were to use the artwork ... or any words ... or any sort of product of our children to portray us to others in a bad light, we'd all be okay with that, right? Especially if this was done on some type of media forum accessible by everyone else in the world?
Y'all bitch and moan about unfair portrayals of gun-owners, shooters, hunters and those who support RKBA. So you really must think that we should use any means necessary to counter our negative image, right? Well, this thread is a good start. Y'all look really intelligent.
I doubt there are many THR members who support the legitimacy of the federal agency in question. There have been hundreds of threads bashing the agency, and you continue to preach to the choir, this thread is just an excuse for everyone to exercise their feeble witticisms.
What is inexecusable is using the artwork of children -- who do not understand the issues, nor even the work, involved with their parents' employment -- as a means to commence redundant criticism of the agency and trying to one-up each other with clever remarks.
No wonder our movement encounters difficulty at every turn. Every time we have a chance to take The High Road, we lower ourselves to the level of those who work against us.