Autopsy X-Ray Shows Lack of Penetration

Status
Not open for further replies.
When I first read "down jacket", I figured maybe the HPs plugged up.. And acting like FMJs woulda passed right through.. Threw me off complete opposite. Then I thought yeah, maybe some rounds not moving fast enough.. If that were the case, they wouldn't have expanded.. Kinda looks like they did. Maybe they dumped all their energy in the jacket and fizzled out? had just enough to penetrate 1".. you'd think if that round in the throat clogged, or something, it woulda kept going deep enough to disable CNS.. awfully weird angle on that one. (good thing I'm not forensics). Still not sure what to think on this one. One more question... To his tattoo artist...
Define "irony"?
 
two points.

another reason that 10 round magazines aren't enough!!!! no brainer there but......

I am skeptical on what he was "tested" for since there are MANY street drugs that do not show up on random drug screens so I'm not 100% convinced he wasn't under the influence of something. Then again, maybe he was the real deal and was able to push on through will and determination alone.
 
This has been discussed before. There is no lack of penetration as claimed.

See...
http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=375650&highlight=ntoa
http://thefiringline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=363597&highlight=ntoa

My observation: In x-rays 1 and 2, there are multiple bullets shown, both .40 S&W and .223 that obviously expanded as designed in the first few inches of flesh, then came to rest against bones without breaking them, apparently because the parachute effect of the expansion reduced their velocity to the point where the bones (which God designed to be strong) stopped them. You can see that officers in this incident achieved at least two much-desired CNS hits and one hit that was directed at the heart, but the slowed-down expanding bullets were stopped by the bones from doing much damage to the spinal cord or the heart. There is also a bullet that seems to have hit the pelvis without damaging it.

Okay, you have a 2D xray of a 3D person. You can't tell what bullets are resting against bones and what bullets are not.

God designed bones to be strong? I am not sure you quite follow biomechanics. "Strong" is very relative. Different bones and different areas of bones have varied levels of strength and flexibility.

CNS shot directed at the heart? What? You mean COM? The heart isn't a CNS structure. A bullet stopped near the heart, but where do you think it entered?

I understand all about the advantages of expanding bullets, and the FBI minimum penetration, etc. But here is an actual x-ray from an actual incident where use of top-notch JHP ammo in a rifle and in one of the more potent handgun calibers apparently caused well-aimed shots to fail, where it seems that simple FMJ or SWC may well have shocked or severed that spinal cord and/or pierced the heart.

Did you look at the near-random distribution of wounds on the suspect's body? What makes you think the shots were well-aimed? If the officers could aim so well, why didn't they shoot him in the head? During the fight, the suspect was continually moving and using cover.

As for the Speer Gold Dot penetration issue, part of the reason for the powerpoint presentation was to correct inaccuracies of the medical examiner's report, specifically about ammo performance. The presentation specifically notes that the Gold Dots cannot expand in just 1" and that the ammo did not fail as reported (page 20).

You might expect more damage from the TAP ammo, but as noted, that ammo failed FBI tests. It isn't really top notch. Maybe you didn't read the whole report?



Now, if you do want to look at something quite interesting, think about all the folks who tell you to use your pistol to shoot the hip to break the pelvis. Now look at all the pistol bullets around the the pelvis and tell me how many broke it. First, it is hard to hit the pelvis with a bullet, primarily because people tend to not aim in the right places. Second, it is hard to hit the proper load bearing areas such that even if you do break off part, if not the right part, you don't get the desired structural failure that will prevent locomotion.
 
it's pretty clear that some of the rounds hit the subject after expanding. That means that they hit something else first

This.

Wasn't he sitting in a car or something?

See the bottom of slide 6.

It appears it may be partially cut off, but bullets went through glass and [cannot read the rest]
 
Last edited:
I wonder if the guy would have gone down faster if the LE's used their shotguns.

It's scary what a determined mind can perform. This guy refused to die. This completely defines "mind over mattter". It's really scary when a wacko like this decides to enter your home. I'm sticking to my 12 gauge shotgun for home defense.
 
It appears it may be partially cut off, but bullets went through glass and [cannot read the rest]

"in this incident, all shots had passed through either the windshield or rear window. Investigators assume that this was the reason for the poor ballistic performance"
 
Thanks for posting that article, very interesting. Makes me think twice about using hollow points.

"Assailant fired 26 rounds and reloaded magazine
from box of loose ammunition"

Ok, I'm glad that guy is dead, but seriously what tough dude! shot all those times and managed to reload his mag from a box of bullets and keep shooting!? the officer that was shot in the forearm didn't (or couldn't) shoot back after being shot once.

But the guy was under the influence of the very dangerous street drug known as marijuana :D I am a little surprised they didn't fine coke/meth/pcp or something of that nature in his system. But, I guess adrenaline was enough for him.

Also, ironic tattoo "live by the gun die by the gun"
 
I understand all about the advantages of expanding bullets, and the FBI minimum penetration, etc. But here is an actual x-ray from an actual incident where use of top-notch JHP ammo in a rifle and in one of the more potent handgun calibers apparently caused well-aimed shots to fail, where it seems that simple FMJ or SWC may well have shocked or severed that spinal cord and/or pierced the heart.

There are 8,800 gun deaths annually in the USA alone and you're debating the effectiveness of standard policy ammunition based on X-rays from 0.01% of those?
 
He wasn't sitting in a car, that was a comment from a different incident. How could an officer have shot him in the ankle from under a car if he were in a car?

I'm guessing a lot of these shots that hit the guy came after he was on the ground. Certainly would explain the bullet in his throat and no throat wound in the photos.
 
He wasn't sitting in a car, that was a comment from a different incident. How could an officer have shot him in the ankle from under a car if he were in a car?

I'm guessing a lot of these shots that hit the guy came after he was on the ground. Certainly would explain the bullet in his throat and no throat wound in the photos.


in this incident, all shots had passed through either the windshield or rear window.

See slide 6.

There were obstructions for the bullets to pass through and they apparently become deformed before they got to him.

We have known for a long time hollow point handgun bullets can fill up with clothing and other things and then act more like FMJs.

'Pre-damaged' bullets gave up some energy getting through the obstruction, and are not going to penetrate as well

Without lateral radiographic views the penetration depth of the bullets cannot be determined.

You mean there is a reason for lateral views????:eek:

Heaven forbid!
 
This incident proves several things.....

One: no two wounds are alike...

Two: Heavy Bullets under 1000fps cannot be depended upon to expand RELIABLY..

Three: The mental state of the assailant may be a factor. Experience and observation tells me that drug use dang sure is

Four: There are no controlling factors in a gunfight.

Five: Whatever can go wrong, WILL go wrong..

There is some back and forth debate over whether the rounds passed through glass.. if so that would explain the "flattening effect" that I saw in the x-rays. The fact that a 180 gr Speer in 40 cal did not open does not surprise me.. that it only penetrated one inch... ahh I have serious doubts

As far as penetration is concerned, without two separate angle views, or rods placed into the wound channels, that information is not ascertainable from the views provided.

I have read and reviewed many similar reports from my own department.. such as..

13 upper torso hits from a 45 ACP 230 grain ball, the suspect continued to fight the officer, and in the process shredded his uniform shirt and outer cover of his vest with a pair of scissors. .. he ran out of ammo and reloaded while this clown was still stabbing him... talk about cool under pressure. But it took 13 rounds..Most passed through... When asked why he shot him 13 times, the officer replied to Homicide and IAD investigators... "Cause I ran outta F-in bullets!" He was actively putting up a fight through out the incident.

Once I arrived just as last rounds were fired in a shooting where officer hit suspect 14 out of 16 rounds with a 9mm 115 gr.. Most solid torso hits, many thru and thru. We also had difficulty handcuffing him. He ran almost 50 yards before we caught him. He died a few minutes later at the scene prior to ambulance arrival.

My Partner was involved in an incident, on my day off, that to this day is an Academy topic. Two suspects, 88 rounds fired BY OFFICERS, both suspects EVENTUALLY DOA... there were incidents of over and under penetration with both Pistols and Carbines deployed. NO TWO GUNSHOT WOUNDS ARE THE SAME... One suspect had taken 7 in the chest with 62gr 223, and two 158 gr .357's and his last words as he was being loaded into the ambulance was "F you pig" .. he passed about an hour later at the Hospital..

I have seen reports of one shot, instant stop kills with a .380, and I have seen reports involving 4 heart lung shots with 240 gr WW soft points, 44 Mag., and the suspect was conscious, alert and oriented when loaded on an ambulance. Later died. (cocaine levels through the roof) Fact is, Man or beast, if it is pumped up and does not want to die, it can take a lot of convincing.

For social work, I personally would not carry ball, and I avoid the heaviest of bullet loadings offered in any particular caliber, regardless of design.

What we as LE hope (note I said HOPE ) to achieve is to instantaneously stop an individual from continuing an attack or imminent threat.

This is USUALLY achieved (again USUALLY) by producing either a CNS/spinal cord shot, or in the case of an upper or lower torso, (yes I said lower, because sometimes that is where they sometimes wind up, it isn't where you were hoping, but sometime in a gunfight you take any hit you can get)

You are wanting to put body fluids in motion, in HOPES to create a hydrostatic shock that will TEMPORARILY shock (it's like hitting them with 50K volts) and they will hopefully drop a weapon or be unable to pull the trigger. Hopefully to put them down (much like a Tazer, only more lasting effects) and give you time to disarm them (take control of weapon or kick it away to deny them it use) , or control (handcuff) them.

This can usually (again USUALLY) be achieved with moderate weight bullets, at very high speeds.. Personally, I use a 135 gr HP in my 40's loaded to about 1350 out of my 96 Beretta's, 44's are 180 grains loaded to over 1400. Heck my .380 launch at 1200.. my 45's are 185 gr at 1250.. , by 357's are 125's loaded to 1380 to 1400.. at least three of those loadings are responsible for one and two shot instant incapacitations by other officer in my department.

We received all the FBI reports, and some of them are, well, we have found flaws in many of them.

The first report that I saw came down to firearms training from planning and research to get a shooters opinion on an FBI report done in the mid 70's on "The effectiveness of modern handgun ammunition in law enforcement".

We questioned some of the findings and that lead to a budget allocation to the firearms training section to conduct our own studies...And we came up with some slightly different conclusions than the FBI... We bought every conceivable caliber, bullet weight, design and manufacture that we could come up with (officers buy their own weapons in our department, and there are few caliber restrictions, 38 spl or larger, 9mm acceptable, off duty limited to .380 or larger)..

We found generally, that over penetration was an issue with heavier, and slower bullets, that ultra light +p's under penetration or "surface bursts" were possible. It was not brand specific. The only SLOW LOAD (under 1000fps) that we found that worked pretty well, was the new at the time, WW Silvertip in 45acp, Chronographed at about 936 on ave, and expansions averaged about .700. Penetration was 12-14 inch average in Gel, and about 4.75 in ductseal.

Maximum desirable results generally were achieved with middle weight bullets for a particular caliber loaded to +P velocities..

We discouraged the use of hand loads, but did not prohibit it. Than for no other reason is there was no control over where the officers obtained them, (hey Uncle Ralph has a reloader), nor control over cleanliness or freshness of components used. It certainly was NOT an issue with hand loaded ammo, just its origins.

This is also why we teach, "Anything worth doing once is worth doing twice", we teach double taps.... minimum...

Just my two cents.... from a pretty solid background of 51 years of shooting, and 30 years on the streets and in firearms ed..
 
Last edited:
The FBI report is addressing INACCURATE claims posted in an NTOA blog (slide 6 of the FBI presentation).


The information reported in the NTOA blog (slide 6 of the FBI presentation) is FALSE!


The FBI report concludes (slide 22):

There is plenty of inaccurate information regarding ballistics/terminal performance disseminated on web forums, even those which are dedicated as LE only.

The .40 S&W ammunition did not fail in this incident.

The performance of the .223 TAP ammunition, although consistent with manufacturer’s claims, did not perform terminally as this Police Department expected.


The shooting occurred in Hazleton, PA. The deceased is George Thomas Deeb III. You can find more information through Google.
 
Last edited:
What all was written about this that we dont know? On page 5 of that I could see peices of letters that were cut off so tell me what else they didnt tell us about this.
 
Why the idiot .40? Its like the .38 S&W to the .38 SP.,,, .40 S&W to 10mm. As Americans we like big cars and trucks and little wuzzy ammo. It hurts our hands and we seem real limp wristed now days.
 
There is no substitute for "sufficient" penetration with a handgun. I've read this topic through and will add one thing. I'm no expert but am a life long hunter. In my youth I lived on a farm and carried a .22 magnum pistol 24/7. Not too keen a game law observer in my teens, if it got up and paused a second - I shot it. Rabbits, fox, grouse, deer, groundhog, etc.etc. literally everything that lives in Virginia except black bear. The largest whitetail I've killed (out of the 40 or so) was with a .22 mag Ruger single six. The .22 mag is often considered as an under-performer in every respect and every measurable category. The one thing it does have is "sufficient" penetration. I guess my point is that anything is deadly if the round is in the right spot and theirs sufficient penetration.
Also there is no way of knowing exactly how far from the subject shooters were. I fail to see how this can happen an self defense distances. Can we discount long distance affecting penetration?
 
I can tell you one thing, as I'd stated earlier in this thread, I wouldn't have a .40 on the place if they'll barely break the skin like on that dude's throat! I've reloaded many boxes of .44 mag, I know what your thoughts are here, please let me finish. I've reloaded 180 gr. Hornady XTP's at around 1300 fps, at 50 ft., they'll literally tear a phone book to shreds. I'm not a forensic scientist by any stretch, but if these Gold Dots won't do more damage than that, I won't be wasting my money on those either! I'll be safe in saying, those XTP's will almost 1 1/2 times themselves in diameter in wood, phone books and I'll bet when they hit bone, they'll splatter those too. JMHO
 
Last edited:
As posted on #19, "came to rest against bones without breaking them." I don't buy that load of manure either! I saw too many of Sir Charles in SouthEast Asia that had bones broken from Heck to lunchtime with a 5.56 { same as the .223 }, sometimes in such configurations that would defy your mind. I shoot the .223 ammo all the time, it'll break bones just like any other high power cartridge will, maybe the Swat Team needs to upgrade their ammo supply.:banghead:
 
One Shot Stop

In all my years of experience I do believe that a Police Riot Shotgun firing a 1oz HP 12ga slug comes as close to a one shot stop as you can get.I'll take a 12ga. and 00buck any day
 
I think the two points that put it all together are: 1) that the bullets apparently went through some part of the car first, which slowed them way down before they even hit the BG, and 2) that I am misinterpreting what I'm seeing on the 2-D x-ray.
 
Page Six-

This is the second the PD has had to shoot a subject in excess of ten times with the .40S&W blah blah blah I can't copy so I have to do this by hand oh here we are-

There was another incident where a subject was shot while inside of his vehicle.



SO what page six says is that he was not in a car, it was somebody else. Again, how could a guy in a car be shot in the ankle from under a car by an officer? Why would that be a sound tactical choice if the other option open to the officer was to just shoot him in the head at near contact distance through the car window?

Mixing your metaphors here people.
 
SO what page six says is that he was not in a car, it was somebody else.

What page six says is that the bullets passed through other material before striking him.

It does not appear to give a complete synopsis of the events.

Bullets damaged by passing through other material do not work as well as bullets that go directly from barrel to body (with some air intervening).

Even the FBI comments indicate that the bullets struck something else before striking the guy.

It is impossible for .40 S&W 180 gr. JHP ammunition to expand with only 1 in. or less penetration in a human body.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top