I did not call anyone stupid
You just made a false assumption by slanting what I said incorrectly.
That's fair enough and you are correct. So I will rephrase.......
How do you think you have the right to say that the actions of others are stupid to point out your mistake, when you yourself acknowledge that what you originally said was incorrect?
Now that that is fixed,
I think I see the issue. I'm trying to be constructive here now ok? You just said
I made a mistake earlier. I missed two words. I should have said "Metal Frame Small Parts" instead of "Metal Frame".
Seriously now, I'm not bashing. I think I just discovered the real problem. Go back and look at your original post. You didn't even say "Metal Frame", you said
2) FrogLube recommends heating - so the liberal coating is allowed to work into the metal (warm metal expands even if it microscopic at that temp vs contracted cold metal)
You said the "metal", not "metal frame"! That's why we all jumped on you
before you corrected your comment. Based on your original post, it sounds like you thought the lube would litterally enter "THE METAL". That's why RCmodel chimed in the way he did! That's why several others of us said "no, wrong, incorrect". Do you see that? If you had in fact said
"2) FrogLube recommends heating - so the liberal coating is allowed to work into the metal
frame(warm metal expands even if it microscopic at that temp vs contracted cold metal)"
there wouldn't have been any issue at all. In fact I'm guessing you would have gotten a bunch of replies that said "Hmmm, that's one way to do it." Am I right? Is this all a big misunderstanding because of the omission of the word "frame" when you thought you had included it?
See then, when you corrected yourself and (let's be honest) got kind of mad in post 22, it's because you thought everyone was putting words in your mouth. But because of the lack of the word
frame, everyone thought you meant something totally different than what you said, but you didn't realize you left out that critical word. I think your perception that it is foolish for people to jump on board with rcmodel, stemmed from the idea that you had infact posted something other than what you did. And if you had posted what thought, I'd agree with you. I think heating the gun is unnecessary overall, but it would probably help spread the lube around the frame. However, that minor discrepancy then made you look like you were backpeddling in post 22.
In putting the pieces together, I don't think you said what you thought you said in your original post.
If I am misunderstanding what I see in this entire thread, please do say so, but I think a few of us are victims of a misunderstanding here because of one word's absense. Take a look and tell me if you agree, cuz now I want to get to the bottom of this.
If not, well then man I'd say that the gun should be heated to whatever temperature Frog Lube tells you, not me, as that will be the vital temperature needed to decrease the lube's viscocity and allow it to work it's way in, and get all your parts coated.
Making a video would be good, now that we understand what you meant.