Ballistics,ammo, Barrle lengths and Roy Rogers?

Status
Not open for further replies.

blindjim

member
Joined
Jun 21, 2011
Messages
57
Location
Stated affair
I’m finding info on how balistics relate to the choice of ammo in a gun whose barrel length is either large or not large.

I’m seeing it written that longer pipes aren’t as affected by slower rounds as are shorter barrels pushing the exact same caliber & type of bullet thru them longer ones have no problem with.

I’m wondering how pertinent it is in choosing your ammo?

Are wwe picking nits saying A 4.2 in barrle needs a faster round running through it than does a 5 in barrel?

What about a 4.0?

Or a 3.9 inch?

If so, and the thoughts on selection of ammo is so acute, where is the dividing line for barrle lengths and speed of the prospective round required to duplicate or resemble that of the bigger faster longer barrel and ammo??

Did someone post the tables and I missed them?

Should I be pushing a 185 or 200 gr. 45 thru my 4.2 inch 45 cal barrle, instead of a hydroshock 230 gr 45?

Or do I need something even faster?

Or as I said, is this fairly inconsequential information?

If I go to a 165 gr 45 cal will the bad guy just laugh it off and continue raiding my fridge?

How come Roy Rogers’ twin six guns shot 67 bullets instead of six? And is he the only cowboy who ever stuffed his horse? Did you know Dale Evans made more money than ol’ Roy did?
 
blindjim said:
....How come Roy Rogers’ twin six guns shot 67 bullets instead of six? And is he the only cowboy who ever stuffed his horse? Did you know Dale Evans made more money than ol’ Roy did?

There are somethings that are not necessary to question....the fact that Roy never lost his hat in a fist fight, had a high capacity revolver, wore white hats, always sang on key, and never had a felony conviction should be all you need to know. Excuse me while I go pack a lunch in my Roy Rogers lunch box.....
 
Rembrandt

But c’mon, a dead horse in the living room? I don’t care how much money trigger made! It makes a person wonder….

Happy Trails.



56hawk

Thanks. I’ve been reading a fair amount of articles like this but not seen a graph such as this one.

If I can take this one to the bank, I’ll go for repeated shooting manageability and just forget about that 40-60fps diff from a 5 inch pipe to a 4 inch pipe.

I’d bet no one is quick enough to jump out of the way of either bullet… and both of ‘em ought to hurt a lot.

Truth be told, I’d opt for whoever delivers the greatest amount of ft lbs of force upon impact, versus speed of the projectile.

For me it’ll come to those rounds from Core & Federal, in JHP ranging between 185 gr and 230 gr. But I don’t feel I want to go with the +P rounds.

I’ll just let how they all feel going down range will make the decision for me. How much flip, recoil, and reacquisition time. I’m betting on 185gr. But hoping for the 200’s or more.

Tanks.
 
All those cowboys had hi cap sixguns.
The good guys had special bullets that only knocked guns out of bad guys'
hands.
Also they never hit a horse.
 
any 45 is going to stop someone, 165 or 230 isnt going to matter....its still a .45

IMHO - the absolute best carry ammo you can get is this stuff

http://www.doubletapammo.com/php/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=21_34&products_id=440


i plan to buy a box next year and start carrying it (might get Corbon DPX's instead of doubletap...same Barnes HP, but packaged by Corbon instead of DT)...i have speer gold dots now, but i plan to change out my carry ammo once a year - those will be my next (but in .40, not .45)

the .45 is 160gr and the .40 is 140gr....sure theyre light, but they expand a lot more than most other HPs (~.80" vs. ~.60" in .40 S&W) and the velocity and ft-lbs of energy are nuts....i may even venture to try the 125gr .40 tac-xp...ballistics on it are even hotter, but sectional density of a 125gr is kinda low... barnes solid copper HPs are proven though....check out corbon dpx rounds or that doubletap tac-xp

corbon makes a +P load also

http://www.shopcorbon.com/DPX-Handgun/45-Auto-Plus-P-185gr-DPX/DPX45185-20/200/Product
and standard
http://www.shopcorbon.com/DPX-Handgun/45-Auto-160gr-DPX/DPX45160-20/200/Product
 
Last edited:
^ i was talking center mass shots - a 45 in the chest is going to put somebody down just as well or better than most other rounds - regardless of weight (im not a 45 fanboy, i carry a 40)
 
I wish I still had my Roy Rogers lunch box, it had Tonto and Silver on it and everything. I wonder how much it would be worh now?... wait.. what were we talking about?...
 
I sincerely appreciate the input thus far.

If I had ice water in my veins, well I’d be dead… but if I wasn’t dead or dying from pneumonia or anemia , directing a 32 cal into the intruder’s noggin’ would very likely remedy just about all the bad guy scenarios… but I’m not that cool any more. Not when awoken from a good slobber… er, slumber.

So big holes some where in between the knees and neck and within the hips and arm pits works for me. It’s kind of good that way too… it won’t have to be a closed box send off… for one of us… maybe.

I’m absolutely certain any number of ammo types can drop interlopers like bad habits at a moments notice provided shot placement is the priority. But as my preference is 45 ACP… given my 12 ga. 2 ¾ ought buck might rest beyond my first reach, then 45 ACP is the ammo which interests me most.

If I had 357s I’d be yakking about 357s just the same way I’m boring folks into near death experiences with all my rhetoric on 45 ACPs, pros & cons. Don’t worry… the the forecast calls for a lot less me once some basic info gets nailed down to my satisfaction… like the new ‘round of no choice’ for my next unannounced guest.


Just how much higher is the high pressure “ + P ” ammo than standard ammo?

Loking at the numbers only, it sure isn’t much of a boost.

Or maybe better put, is it worth the wear and tear it puts on a weapon plowing all those slugs down at the range by the hundred or thousands, so you might be able to pop off a possible 2 or 5 rounds at some late night goblin??

I’m gonna venture a guess and say Nope. I thinks it’s some fancy schmancy esoteric fad round whose glitz and glam numbers are designed to attract those into the numbers game and not those into the results or more practically put, the drop dead game in a few shots or less.

I mean when the numbers say the diffs are 4 to 7%, roughly, difference from Corbon or Federal, round to round I’m not gonna get to enthusiastic about feeding over priced… uh, pressured ammo to my pistol. I’ll risk having the Flash committing a breaking and entering at my address…. As he’s very likely the only one who could avoid the hot & nasty spiced up high dollar & high pressure slugs flying his way.

45 cal JHP wins hands down… but nothing fancy is necessary. Grip, Breathe, squeeze.

Besides …. The well hidden deadfalls & Claymores ought to be enough anyhow.
 
Or maybe better put, is it worth the wear and tear it puts on a weapon plowing all those slugs down at the range by the hundred or thousands, so you might be able to pop off a possible 2 or 5 rounds at some late night goblin??

I’m gonna venture a guess and say Nope. I thinks it’s some fancy schmancy esoteric fad round whose glitz and glam numbers are designed to attract those into the numbers game and not those into the results or more practically put, the drop dead game in a few shots or less.

I mean when the numbers say the diffs are 4 to 7%, roughly, difference from Corbon or Federal, round to round I’m not gonna get to enthusiastic about feeding over priced… uh, pressured ammo to my pistol. I’ll risk having the Flash committing a breaking and entering at my address…. As he’s very likely the only one who could avoid the hot & nasty spiced up high dollar & high pressure slugs flying his way.

That was so perfectly said I just wanted to repeat it.
 
Good points. Seems to me that +P+ is less necessary in a 45 that say a 380. When you can add a couple of inches of penetration to a pocket gun it's worth it to me. If you're carrying a 45 you're probably more concerned with over-penetration. As for wear on the gun, I practice with cheap ball ammo most of the time. Every few months I may shoot some defense rounds just to be sure I'm familiar with them, but I'm not paying a buck a round for everyday target ammo.
 
+P in that corbon round has about 80 ft-lb of energy more than the standard round (its 185gr vs 160gr, and has 25fps more velocity) - everything else is about the same

while i agree it may not be that much more - for defense ammo you will hopefully never need to use, spending a few extra dollars for a better round should be a no brainer

if an extra $20 a year will break you, youre in the wrong hobby with the wrong caliber of gun

i dont know anybody who shoots +P for target ammo....just shoot regular ball for that and keep the high end stuff for carry

i buy a box and load up my magazine that i carry (or two if you take a spare with you) and shoot off the few rounds left over to get a slight feel for the ammo....repeat once a year

as for "fancy overpriced" ammo - the corbon DPX rounds are a bit more expensive than remington golden sabers or whatever you choose to carry - but a solid copper HP that expands like a flower instead of smashing and expanding is, to me, worth the extra $10 per year difference

3-front-L-R-CorBon-230-CorBon-DPX-Win-SXT-back-Fed185-Rem185-Speer200.jpg

can you tell which one is the DPX? thats why i believe theyre better and worth the price
 
if an extra $20 a year will break you, youre in the wrong hobby with the wrong caliber of gun

or

You understand that the extra 80ft/lb of force is partially used to make up for a loss in cross sectional density. It is trying to make up for the penetration you lost going lighter. You also understand that being a handgun it really is under powered any way and going with a light weight over pressured round isn't going to make it significantly better.

or
(like me)

You don't know a single officer that carries the round. Yet, you know several officers that have first hand experience with Federal HST and Winchester Ranger Bonded. They can tell you from range time that the bullets are consistent across thousands of rounds. Some of them can also tell you from actual OIS experience that the bullet works efficiently in putting down the bad guy. So, you save the money and get something that you can verify works.

If somebody feels Cor Bon, Double Tap, or Buffalo Bore is worth it, they should buy it. To say that using it is a "no brainer" or that people are in the wrong hobby for not using it is improper and absurd.
 
You understand that the extra 80ft/lb of force is partially used to make up for a loss in cross sectional density. It is trying to make up for the penetration you lost going lighter. You also understand that being a handgun it really is under powered any way and going with a light weight over pressured round isn't going to make it significantly better.

the standard round was 160gr, and the +p was a 185gr....what are you talking about losing SD and going with a lighter round?

and reading comprehension owns you, that or you twist well and should become a politician.....i stated that between the two rounds i posted, the +p was obviously a better round because it was +p, had more weight and more velocity. the only reason to choose the standard dpx over the +p dpx would be cost

i didnt say if a person prefers standard rounds over +p that theyre in the wrong hobby - i said if $20 is a deal breaker for a self defense round that perhaps this hobby isnt the right one to have.... $20 wont get you far in the shooting world, so if its that big of a deal breaker then theres a problem, it had nothing to do with their round or caliber of choice

my comments about the barnes hollow points expanding better was directed at the guy who claims theres no difference in any round and that theyre just overpriced...i simply posted a picture showing the expansion benefits that the barnes HPs have over a standard HP...if you prefer standard JHPs thats fine and your choice, but its inaccurate to say theres no benefit going with a round that uses barnes HPs and that theyre just overpriced.... the "no brainer" comment was directed ONLY at the 160gr standard pressure DPX vs the 185gr +P DPX, nothing else.

he can use whatever round he wants - but if he was concerned over something as insignificant as barrel length, i figured it would be a relevant topic to also hit on ballistics of individual rounds....its not like this is a "which round is better for SD? 22 or 45?" thread, he was asking particulars, so i mentioned some
 
Last edited:
the standard round was 160gr, and the +p was a 185gr....what are you talking about losing SD and going with a lighter round?

Reading fast and thinking slow is never a good combination. I admit my mistake.

i said if $20 is a deal breaker for a self defense round that perhaps this hobby isnt the right one to have.

Like I said maybe they don't see the extra $20 as worth it. Some people have different criteria.

Locally the Cor Bon DPX 9mm is $37.00. For that price I can get a box of Winchester Ranger Bonded 147gr and a box of Winchester Ranger 147gr FMJ. I get a box of SD ammo and a box of range ammo that shoots just like it. To me that is a better choice because I know the Winchester rounds work just fine. I can verify it with real world results from people I know. It isn't third hand information. It is more like "hey Tom when you had to shoot that perp you were carrying Winchester, right?"

Cor Bon works fine according to all of the articles I've read. That is great but I chose what I can verify and what allows me to practice more. Plus, being able to practice with a round that has the exact same charge and profile as my SD round makes me more comfortable if I ever have to depend on the bullet. I know my SD round will load because it is shaped nearly identical to my practice load. I know how it shoots POI vs POA because the charge and primer are exactly like my practice round.

Like I said different criteria and different priorities.

Different bullets do expand differently. That is why the major manufacturers make different lines of ammo. A Winchester Bonded expands differently than a Winchester T, or a Silver Tip. Each one will expand differently and penetrate differently. The same goes for the various Federal rounds and the various Hornady rounds. Each bullet is engineered with a different set of criteria. To say there is no difference in the rounds would be inaccurate. To say there is little to no difference in the effectiveness of most modern hps would be more accurate.

I think we may agree on that point.
 
going by what you just said - you have a reason to purchase those rounds over the corbon, the availability of a similar target load to practice with, wanting to be familiar with your SD rounds, reliability and having a round you know will feed properly, etc....its not simply cost

also - my cost comments originally were again, direct at the difference between the 160gr standard dpx and the 185gr dpx (which happens to be $5, not 20 - i just threw the 20 out there on a whim)

i know people who all swear by different types of ammo whether it be federal, winchester, corbon, whatever....thats all fine, i wasnt talking about that ammo at all until my post about why i like the barnes HPs over the others...i never mentioned any other ammo being bad, and i even said in my other post that any modern JHP is going to do the job just fine, especially coming out of a .45

i think you took my comment about cost out of context on accident - i was not comparing the cost of the corbon to other ammo - i was comparing the cost of the standard round and the +p round....the +p is overall a better round (in the DPXs) and the cost difference shouldnt be a factor for anyone who is looking to buy them (DPXs)




like i said before - i currently carry speer gold dots, im not just a corbon fanboy and im not a 45 fanboy (i carry a 40)...i was simply speaking of ballistics which was the topic of the thread.... the round itself is going to play more factor than the gun it is being shot from, IMO....a .45 out of a g26 is going to hurt just as bad as a .45 out of a 1911, but the wound channel and force that it hits will not be equivalent between rounds...thats all im getting at
 
i think you took my comment about cost out of context on accident - i was not comparing the cost of the corbon to other ammo - i was comparing the cost of the standard round and the +p round....the +p is overall a better round (in the DPXs) and the cost difference shouldnt be a factor for anyone who is looking to buy them (DPXs)

Yep and agreed. At that point the big questions should be, can the person shoot the +P well and can their gun handle enough to test for feeding.

I should refrain from posting after pulling 18 hour shifts. I have done it repeatedly and made similar mistakes repeatedly.

a .45 out of a g26 is going to hurt just as bad as a .45 out of a 1911, but the wound channel and force that it hits will not be equivalent between rounds

I agree. Just a word of caution to everybody about seeking power house rounds. Remember that a bullet can be pushed past it's design limits. Just because it is +P or +P+ doesn't mean it is better. Just check out the Winchester LE data on the 127gr+P+ 9mm T series. When compared to the 124gr +P and 147gr it actually comes up short in certain areas. It will get the job done. However, it doesn't show a major improvement in any area. It penetrates over 1 inch less than the 147gr but only expands .02 inches more.

Is that worth the extra recoil and gun abuse? Each shooter must determine that for theirself. Each shooter should also investigate the claims of extra effectiveness when deciding on power house loads. Some times that extra 100 ft/sec isn't an advantage.

I'm not saying that is the case with Cor-Bon. It is more of a general guideline that I believe should always be followed.
 
Everything we do, we do with an eye towards something else… Aristotle

I guess Arty was saying we’re not too often satisfied… for long. Or where we think we’re headed isn’t where we wind up.

Margins are important for typists, and Wall Street . marginal performance gains are sometimes all we’re able to grasp.

Having an edge is always important. If only a marginal one.

, I’m almost positive Roy & Gabby gave little or no thought to how fast a bullet was traveling, or how they could make one expand. The only Bullet thoughts around Roy’s camp were if bullet could find the bad guys or Ms. Evans.

That was some nice reading about the current pros & cons of lighter faster rounds. New designs. Materials. …and advertising.

For me, it’s been decades since I was uh, motivated to carry weapons. So all of this is news to me.

I have to however, let experience prevail. Along with practical methods and honesty. Somewhere in there is where I’d bet a marginal edge resides.

Shooting for me today is for survival. Not for fun. It was fun some years past… a little. Then it wasn’t. Apparently that has not changed. It’s no fun to have to be forced to step out and spend over $1500 on arms alone, to try to stay healthy, and protect my property.

Or as some would have you believe I need to zip several hundred rounds of Pace car ammo so I’ll have it’s feel down pat.

Right.

Long ago, I used FMJ for everything. The idea then, as perhaps now, was to put ‘one ’ slug into a critical area of the culprit before he put ‘one’ into you. There was little conjecture or ruminating on how much penetration or expansion was going on. Then too there was almost no talk about the need for mega capacity clips. One round or maybe two. Three if you were in a real giving mood.

For speed, I was fascinated by the 357 Magnum… though most often I filled those revolvers with 38 SPL instead.

Acquiring the proper optics (for myself) will further the entertainment aspect.
Today I picked up my new Ruger KP 345. 50 rds of 230 FMJ. Also a 20 rds of Hornaday 185 gr JHP, . $20 for the hardball. $22 for the designer ammo.

So I’ll spend the buck a shot for exposure and relavent experience for regaining muscle memory and judgement… ‘till I home in on what is comfortable for me. Albeit, it’s likely to be the 200 JHP somebody or other round.

Actually I really can’t see myself even in a carry situation filling up clips with less weighty rounds than the 200 or 185, as I see those two a pick ‘em affair.

Watch… I’ll wind up with the same old 230 I shot for a long time… too long… but now in a JHP instead.

But whatever the slug, If I can double or beter still, triple tap spot on, and not waver far off, that’s the round I’ll shoot. At home. On the street. Whereever.

That used to be 38 spl, or 45 aCP.

Unless I run into a real pro by accident who is wearing Kevlar underoos, I’ll keep betting my life on the sizeable craters 2 or 3, 45 cal JHP projectiles can develop in the human body. Not to mention the redirecting force of impact/power of the hurtling metal itself stopping or reversing some assailants tracks..

But while on my own playground, I’ll default to 12 ga single ought or # 4 or 5 shot. Mega watt flash lights, and an absence of . worry over wether or not I should use 3 inch or 2.75 in shells. .. and the 45 auto will hang around for JIC.

In fact had I more paitience and greater presence just some weeks ago, I’d have opted for a 20 ga setup identical to my now 12 ga outfit… come to think of it.

Today, , The caliber du jour is Hornady 185 gr. JHP… as it was handy… but along side it sits Ye Olde Standby… FMJ 230 gr.

…and this bit also bugs me or maybe it’s premature Alzheimer’s taking root…

Wasn’t the standard hardball 45 round a 240 grain arrangement and not a 230 grain product?? I could have swore….

Oil well… what’s a few grains among friends, anyhow? It’s what is propelling this thread.

BTW... this just in... the term hobby isn't applicable with regard to fire arms... in my case. Not yet anyhow.

...and the price of poker is a bit more here than just the price of shells.
 
im confused...you are posting up about how little stuff doesnt matter and how any ammo will do just fine like it did just fine back in the day etc....so why start the thread asking about little differences in barrel length etc? not ragging on you or anything, just curious what the true purpose of the thread was?

also - the hornady will be fine, but you mention the FMJ a few times - i highly advise not to carry FMJ ...i assume you already know, but figured i would throw it out there anyways

not that FMJ wont get the job done, but with FMJ ammo you run the risk of severe over penetration and possibly harming anybody who might happen to be behind the person you are shooting...the JHP isnt just a round focus on maximum damage, its also damage control to dissipate some of the energy of the bullet
 
tbutera2112

Thanks much for the comments and info you’ve provided here thus far. It is indeed appreciated.

In fact thanks to any and all that have made positive contributions. I hope I can return the favor.

Why the thread?

A knee jerk reactionary post that sought to find some more perspectives on the disparity of barrel lengths and various shot. In fact, the info surprised me that it had so much worth or acclaim.

I had given no attention whatever to barrel length when seeking a 45 auto. None. Well, none past the idea of “How long a barrel do I need to accurately shoot at someone who will be less than 30 ft away?”

I figured by my history, 4 inchers were my low limit.

Speed, penetration, and blossom weren’t concerns at all… thinking then I’ll pull off a few in either the kitchen or living room or at some fella sliding in thru a window.

So secondarily seeing such info gave me pause.

Maybe I should have re-thunk some of those 1911s… or maybe the Sig 1911 was a way better pick, and I blew it!

Naturally, being so inquisitive I continued elsewhere to seek out more info on just how pertinent this data was once translated into practical applications or settings.

During my acquisition of what I could find and call pertinent info, here and otherwise, I’ve since concluded as you have just said, JHP is the type of ammo I need for personal defense.

The published data I’ve seen from various bullet makers thus far says a bit more, but IMHO, not terribly.

I feel now I’ll be comfortable with any noteable state side brand, 45 cal JHP ammo…. In either 185 gr, or above…. FOR MY PURPOSES.

Were I to be at large with a gun, perhaps then I’d opt for the 185 or less ammo of the same genre. Maybe.

I live amongst urban sprawl. I’d suspect any severe engagements would occur in less peopled situations. I doubt seriously someone inside the mall will throw down on me.

Outside in the parking area? Probably. Overpenetration seems less erstwhile a worry then, if it ever really was..

Is it true that if you shot a JHP and it went thru a large coat, winter, rain, suit or jacket only, it would fall immediately onto the floor as it hit no denser materials?

Or, OMG, if you miss your target entirely? Any similar threat or incident I’ve ever encountered was almost a hands on affair. Very up close and personal. About the only way you missed was if you pulled the trigger before the weapon was out of your holster.

So when the bad guy and you are hugging each other, what round should you have in the chamber so you don’t kill more than one person??

I’m sorry to be as demonstrative here, but it’s hard for me to get past what have been my reality. Every time a gun was pointed at me or I pointed a gun at someone else, it was from around six feet or so distances.

Then too, I’m also constantly battleing within myself with ego, and common sense with most matters life dispenses. Past history too says Non JHP bullets do work extremely well…. So that keeps cropping up and tainting my posted remarks.

…and I’ve yet to have one go completely thru a human being…. Even with a 45 FMJ fired from within 20ft… and less..

Maybe today’s 45 ammo is different… so I’m inquiring.

Some of my current posts here as well surround my own latest purchases and perhaps some inkling of thwarting a remorseful buy on my selection of the KP 345 which has the shorter barrel. Otherwise, I’m way OK with the KP gun. The light fits. The pistol fits my grasp well, and it feels right.

Ruger support says too, I can load whatever ammo is sold germaine to my handgun. +P, ++++P+++ … whatever. They also said the hotter the round the more wear and tear on the pistol, naturally. But with a piece that can easily dispense 10,000 rounds or more in it’s serviceable lifetime, I’m not gonna worry much about hot round abuse.

Now, as I see the facts on ballistic desparities, barrel lengths issues, I am going to concern myself with what is sensible. What is a good to very good solution for my needs and my weapon.

Thanks to the info here and online, I’m now OK with straying from what once worked ammo wise, and am now open to other ideas… but not those which seem extreme.

I’ll even look deeper into that DXP ammo posted here. And I’ve no allegiance or deep loyalty to any past or current maker of these more fashionable JHP +P, or +P+, style bullets. Or makers of FMJ.

There’s tons of press online enough so one can choose well a good stable, consistent shot.

I’ve gained that which everyone seeks, confidence. I’d bet no one here perhaps, has shot each and every round for themselves into a goat, or gelatin filled torso, dug ‘em all out and done any meticulous note taking on the results, from one to another.

But we do so in our mind. We use someone else info, experience, wisdom or hype to comfort some choice and we feel good as the result.

See I’m looking at this from a viewpoint wherein someone else is standing across from me, maybe with a pistol too, and I need the confidence to stand there and shoot well…. Or duck or whatever… but fill my weapon with ABC or XYZ shells already, that I believe whole heartedly will win the day for me.

I’ve given not one seconds worth of worry to aiming at paper men… past the idea of it’s reminding skill gaining necessity. I need to relax some now, and with yesterday’s handgun arrival, Im sure I will very soon.

But yeah.. that Sig 1911 sure was nice… and should have been for a grand.
 
There are a bunch of Roy Rogers lunch boxes on ebay, several between $150 and $200. Some are ridiculous at $500 and more (no bids on those..haha!). Roy and Dale were a class act; down to earth, generous, and some of the strongest and most positive forces in the pro-gun community. RIP, Roy.
 
my barrel is 3.26" and shoots .40 S&W....i have never felt under-gunned and ive seen the havoc a .40 and .45 will do from a 3-4" barrel....i wouldnt be concerned at all about choosing a gun with a short barrel...mine is nice and accurate and im 100% confident it will put somebody down if i ever had to use it, regardless of what ammo i had in it at the time
 
I'm old fashioned, I still shoot 230 hydroshocks, in both my 45's. They seem pretty good to me.
 
tbutera2112
3.25? How far off do you call accurate? I’m curious. Never would I have even thought about a weapon with so short a pipe. Never. I’d use a knife instead, and no one wants to bring a knife to a gun fight. Well, not if you want to have a shot at winning it. Lol..

Your thoughts however are substantiating my point, pretty much. Thanks.

I felt briefly I had made a really stupid pick going with the shorter pipe. That’s all. Not now though. Initially that Sig 1911 felt OK… but was a mite too thick for my hand… I thought. Then was the Storm. In 40 SW. that felt really good all over. Action and all.

But as Gym posted here, I tend to cling… to what I’ve personally experienced… and that’s 38 SPL, & 357 in revolvers, and 45 autos. Wanting a 45 an auto became first choice and 45 a matter of course.

I sure do regret now not having looked into the Ruger SR 1911 out new this year. At $799 I’d probably gone off for that one… also due to it’s one tenth larger grip over the 345’s.

I also see the advantage of stepping down a notch or so to gain more controllability and land another shot or two closer to the first or desired mark.


Gym
I’m anxious to try some of those rounds, having heard so much about them.


I saw Roy & Dale in a parade when I was a kid. riding in a red Caddy convertible with Trigger walking along behind. I'm pretty sure Bullet was driving.....

not sure... it was a long time ago.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top