Hi_Powrd_Raine
Member
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2007
- Messages
- 1
I am reviewing a case for a class in school. I am intentionally leaving out specific identifying markers for this case because I am searching for facts instead of hearsay. I would love to hear your opinions. All the facts are listed below:
In an event in 1975, an AR-15 was used to kill, execution-style 2 individuals. This weapon was then moved with other weapons and explosives by other perpetrators in a station wagon. However, due to storing the weapons and explosives too close to the exhaust system the car exploded in a ball of flames, says authorities. The AR-15 was recovered, but the ballistics expert could not perform the firing pin test because the damage to the rifle was extensive; however, an extractor test was done and found to be compatible with casings found near the bodies.
My thoughts are:
>>Being former EOD, I find the "storing too close to the exhaust to be highly unlike to cause an explosion of fire.
>>If the weapon was damaged too much for a firing pin test, wouldn't it stand to prove that it was also damaged for the extractor test?
>>How long does it take to change out parts on an AR-15?
>>There was no conclusive tests that the AR-15 tested belonged to the perpetrator.
>>The situation was during a "war-like" period in that area and everyone walked around heavily armed. It could be possible that the ammo could have been chambered, then extracted, and loaded into another weapon. This could leave the marks of the original weapon on the casing.
I would love to hear your thoughts.
In an event in 1975, an AR-15 was used to kill, execution-style 2 individuals. This weapon was then moved with other weapons and explosives by other perpetrators in a station wagon. However, due to storing the weapons and explosives too close to the exhaust system the car exploded in a ball of flames, says authorities. The AR-15 was recovered, but the ballistics expert could not perform the firing pin test because the damage to the rifle was extensive; however, an extractor test was done and found to be compatible with casings found near the bodies.
My thoughts are:
>>Being former EOD, I find the "storing too close to the exhaust to be highly unlike to cause an explosion of fire.
>>If the weapon was damaged too much for a firing pin test, wouldn't it stand to prove that it was also damaged for the extractor test?
>>How long does it take to change out parts on an AR-15?
>>There was no conclusive tests that the AR-15 tested belonged to the perpetrator.
>>The situation was during a "war-like" period in that area and everyone walked around heavily armed. It could be possible that the ammo could have been chambered, then extracted, and loaded into another weapon. This could leave the marks of the original weapon on the casing.
I would love to hear your thoughts.