Baseball - Congress - why?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Baseball is specifically subject to Congressional oversight, since it is specifically exempted from the Sherman Antitrust Act. The price of their being allowed a monopoly on the business of baseball is that they are answerable to Congress for their policies and procedures.

Whether they should still, in today's world, be exempt from antitrust law is another question entirely. Regardless, that's why they have to go before Congress over scandals and such, while the NFL will not.
 
It's silly, isn't it? It's not as though this country does not have more pressing problems for Congress to address than keeping steroids out of what used to be considered our "national pastime." But baseball is symbolic, and our cultural symbols are held dear to all Americans. Don't mess with baseball, apple pie, Mom or 4th of July parades ...

Maybe it's all a ploy to keep everyone from thinking about drilling for oil in the ANWR, the rising gas prices, the mess in Iraq, Iran's nukes, the idiocy of North Korea, the cesspool Russia is becoming (and the question of where all the former USSR's nukes are) and the UN's plot to rule the U.S.
 
Baseball is specifically subject to Congressional oversight, since it is specifically exempted from the Sherman Antitrust Act.
Aha, I did not know that.
 
they don't have enough to do and it keeps them from screwing up other, more important things. mcole
 
I think this column about sums it up.

http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/ne...119B7AE9F7ACF4BB86256FC700376A36?OpenDocument
SATIRE: Deficit junkies
By RICK HOROWITZ

03/17/2005

NEW YORK

In a collision of two of America's best-known, if not always best-regarded, institutions, Major League Baseball officials announced today that they are investigating Congress.

The surprise announcement, made at a midday news conference at baseball's Manhattan headquarters, was certain to increase tensions between the National Pastime and the nation's lawmakers. But baseball officials claimed they had no choice.

"We have become more and more worried about reports of disturbing congressional behavior," said commissioner Bud Selig, citing both general ethical concerns and, particularly, recent highly publicized allegations of widespread budget abuse. "If we don't look into it, who will?"

According to baseball sources, "invitations to testify" already have been issued to several prominent members of the House of Representatives, with one and possibly two hearings scheduled for next week. The list of invitees was understood to include Speaker Dennis Hastert, R-Ill., and Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., as well as Rep. Tom Davis, R-Va., and Henry Waxman, D-Calif., the chairman and ranking minority member of the House Government Reform Committee.

"We have no partisan agenda here," Selig insisted. "That's why we wanted to hear from people on both sides of the aisle, to give them the opportunity to clear their names."

Notably absent from the list was the embattled House Majority Leader, Tom DeLay, R-Texas. A senior baseball official said the omission was deliberate, noting the heavy attention already focused on DeLay for questionable fund raising and other activities.

"The last thing we want is to turn this thing into a media circus," said the official. The other members, he added, simply have to "show up and prove they're innocent."

With or without DeLay, the prospects for avoiding a circus seem slim at best. With at least some of Congress' biggest names on the witness list, the hearings are sure to become one of the season's must-have tickets for sports fans and political junkies alike.

The prominence of the names, however, seemed no deterrent to baseball officials. Indeed, Selig seemed eager for the chance to make a few of government's heaviest heavy hitters account for themselves.

"These people are not above the law," Selig said. "You know, they may fly in expensive planes and raise millions of dollars and be on C-SPAN, but they put their pinstripes on one leg at a time, just like the rest of us."

At the same time, Selig maintained, "these people" have a special responsibility to the public that helps pay their salaries.

"They're role models," he said. "I know many of our own players dream about being congressmen when they retire. And how about the kids? What do the kids think when they see Congress putting up these huge deficit numbers year after year? That it's OK to do it because their favorite congressman does it?"

Selig maintained that his sport's central place in American life made it the appropriate forum for airing questions about possible congressional misdeeds. And while conceding that baseball has no "formal" jurisdiction over Congress, the commissioner said that he expected the legislators to appear anyway.

"I assume they like sitting next to the dugout during the World Series," Selig said knowingly. "Show me where 'good seats for congressmen' is written in the Constitution."

Early reaction from Capitol Hill was muted, with no member of the congressional leadership willing to comment for attribution. Several, however, seemed stunned by the sudden assertion of baseball's authority over their activities. At a minimum, they said, they were concerned that preparing for and appearing at hearings would disrupt their schedules.

But Selig already had anticipated that argument, and he wasn't buying it. "From what certain people in Congress have been up to lately," he declared, "they must have all sorts of time on their hands."

Copyright Rick Horowitz

Rick Horowitz is a syndicated columnist based in Milwaukee.
 
Baseball is part of the 'Bread and Circuses" program.

Yup. A breakdown in these programs might cause the subjects to start getting restless. With more time on their hands some might just start taking an interest in what those little critters are up to out in D.C. I imagine that the prospect of looking out their office windows at a scene similiar to that which we've been seeing in Lebanon might make some of the ruling elite a bit nervous. Better keep baseball up and running.

With all that said, will the lack of hockey cause Canadians with spare time on their hands to take a look at Ottawa? :rolleyes:

- Abe
 
I've been wondering about this whole steroid business as well.

Is the use of steroids by the players illegal? Have any laws been broken?

And just what is contempt of Congress, because I have lots of contempt for Congress? :cuss:
 
I've been wondering about this whole steroid business as well.

Is the use of steroids by the players illegal? Have any laws been broken?

Yes it is illegal (unless prescribed by a doctor), anabolic steroids are a controlled substance.
 
I like that congress is doing something about this. With the ridiculous amounts of taxpayer dollars that go into stadiums and such these rich spoiled SOB's ought to be held accountable for cheating with steroids. I dont want to tell my kid the only way he can ever make it into pro athletics is through roids.

I would prefer congress stay out of this by not allowing taxpayer dollars to finance a private company though. That and remove the tax deduction for sports tickets and paid spokesman advertising.
 
Since Congress refuses to address serious subjects like illegal immigration they have to do something with their time . Conseco is using the opportunity to sell his book and at the same time show how rediculous Congress is !!!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top