I don't believe that's correct. At most it's an opinion. Many Colt historians feel that the burst cylinders were due to loading conical rounds improperly rather than the cylinders being unable to withstand heavy powder charges. And there's certainly no relationship between burst cylinders on guns made in the 1850's and occasional (not epidemic) damaged wedges made in the 1990's.In it's original form it could not stand up to a cylinder full of powder.
In it's original form it could not stand up to a cylinder full of powder
In it's original form it could not stand up to a cylinder full of powder.
In it's original form it could not stand up to a cylinder full of powder
I didn't think I needed to specify that I was talking about modern Walker reproductions
I don't know if this is indicative of older Walkers made 20 years ago
StrawHat said:I have not used a "light" loading in a Walker.
ClemBert Quote:
"Originally Posted by StrawHat
I have not used a "light" loading in a Walker."
What is the load you are using and have you ever experienced any type of damage to your Walkers?
StrawHat
...as much powder as I can get in the chamber and have slight compression when I seat the round ball...