Ed Ames
Member
This is a bizarre question.
The United States was founded on the principle that the people have a right to life, liberty, and all that jazz. Body armor is a strictly defensive tool with the sole purpose of defending life. It causes no harm, creates no risk, has no impact on anyone but the wearer ... and those who attemp to deny the wearer their right to life.
The only argument for outlawing the use of armor by ANY group is the theory that the group has less right to live than other groups.
I refuse to accept that for myself.
The United States was founded on the principle that the people have a right to life, liberty, and all that jazz. Body armor is a strictly defensive tool with the sole purpose of defending life. It causes no harm, creates no risk, has no impact on anyone but the wearer ... and those who attemp to deny the wearer their right to life.
The only argument for outlawing the use of armor by ANY group is the theory that the group has less right to live than other groups.
I refuse to accept that for myself.