Book Review - Molon Labe

Status
Not open for further replies.

ilbob

Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2006
Messages
22,901
Location
Illinois
Book Review
Molon Labe
by: Boston T. Party

A few months ago, someone mentioned this book in a post on THR. I went to Amazon.com and found it. It had 40 some reviews, generally raving about it. I like to read, so I ordered a copy. I finally got around to reading it a couple of weeks ago.

This is a book that defies obvious characterization. It is educational, motivational, and deeply disturbing all at the same time. Its also mostly a good read, even with the not so subtle attempts to inform, influence and educate the reader (its not as blatant and annoying as Patriots is in that respect).

Its a well thought-out explanation for why the author believes the Free State Project chose the wrong state (he makes a pretty good case that the FSP should have chosen Wyoming).

Parts of it reminded me of Unintended Consequences, with its realistic and graphic depiction of government excesses, and its deep understanding and affection for the rural and western gun culture in the US.

Its a pretty well thought-out plan for taking over Wyoming with a FSP like effort, that while it is so over optimistic as to be almost not credible, it does show the author gave the idea a lot of thought.

On to the disturbing parts. It has some of the usual silliness from the kooky right including common law nonsense and the gold standard. Slipping this kind of stuff into the book makes it a lot easier to just dismiss it as another right wing kook book.

Most disturbing of all, it seems the author has given up on the idea that gradual non-violent change can be implemented to regain our lost liberties. He makes a pretty good case that government will not give up its power easily, and that it will take violence to regain our freedoms. I have a hard time arguing against this, as government's thirst for power at all levels seems to know no bounds, and what is an individual citizen to do about it? The congressional elections of 1994 proved that there is a thirst for freedom, but the end result of that election was actually to decrease our freedoms in some respects.

I give it 4 stars (out of five). It would probably rate 4.5 stars except for the inexplicable inclusion of stuff from various web sites that does not always seem to have a whole lot to do with the storyline, and probably should have been taken out, as a lot of what was included is almost unreadable.
 
ilbob, thanks for your post.
I'm glad that you generally liked Molôn Labé!, though I
do not understand your objection to the common law and
the gold standard. I.e., what's wrong with honest law and money?

As to your:

Most disturbing of all, it seems the author has given up on the idea that gradual non-violent change can be implemented to regain our lost liberties. He makes a pretty good case that government will not give up its power easily, and that it will take violence to regain our freedoms. I have a hard time arguing against this, as government's thirst for power at all levels seems to know no bounds, and what is an individual citizen to do about it?

I think that if freedom-loving Americans localized for more
social and political effect, such a county or state could
prove to be a fairly strong buffer against unlawful encroachments.

National political solutions are most likely out of reach.
Reason? More voters have a vested interest in the welfare/police
state than not.

Regards,

Boston T. Party
http://www.javelinpress.com (Boston's books)
http://www.freestatewyoming.org (FSW website)
http://www.fundamentalsoffreedom.com/fswforum/index.php (FSW forum open to all)
 
I've been meaning to read more of Boston's books. I've got a copy of the gun bible and it wasn't quite what I was expecting(I expected something going by the name Gun Bible to contain more than a page about shotguns, for example) but it was still mostly informative and a good read.

From your review of Molon Labe, I get the impression that the bits I didnt like about the gun bible were carried over into that as well. I don't like the right wing "kook" stuff either, and there was a lot of commentary and personal philosophy that felt out of place. Maybe it fits better in a fictional story than it would in a reference book. I think I might have to give it a read.
 
Preston's Playboy interviews were great. They were helpful in understanding how a formal law is not needed to regulate human interactions. The book also made me start asking more questions. The intrastate airline and gun makers brought some deep thought as well.

- Sig
 
What's that? I don't remember any "right-wing kook stuff", just regular common sense.
I put it in quotes because I don't necessarily disagree with him, but I do think it lessens the book. He tossed the words commie and socialist around quite a lot, even in places they aren't warranted, lots of liberal bashing, and the whole premise of the book being how various guns would fair fighting the government. I just feel like it could have been an amazing reference book, but all that stuff makes it inaccessible to some readers and downright offensive to others (the women and guns section was horrendous) and the letter to the columbine girl was way out of line. It degraded an otherwise great book and pushed it to the fringe.

While I agree with a lot of what he says, I feel that it could have been done more tactfully, in a way that wouldn't make someone new to guns think he was crazy.
 
I have enjoyed all of Boston T Party's books. Guess that just makes me a right wing nut job.
P.S. Write more!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top