BRM Basic Rifle Marksmanship (Long Post)

Status
Not open for further replies.

kBob

Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2006
Messages
6,459
Location
North Central Florida
I would like to discuss military Basic Rifle Marksmanship.

I do not wish t discuss the importance to strategy of BRM or whether or not time and tax payer money should be spent on it, but what it is, was, and might be.

I will say that for me non military marksmanship training began before starting public school and involved a Daisy BB gun and empty Lucky Strikes ciggerette packs with their big round circle on the side.

This was followed with in weeks by a Daisy Targeter BB pistol and the same target.

Fast forward two years and there was a .22 rifle. I am reluctant to include the shotguns BUT they did make it easier to use a military sight free system later.

By the time I was 14 I was sure I was a dead eye shot with the rifle.

Then I received my first military training courtesy of JROTC in the public schools.

The people who taught me had been light weapons Infantrymen and wore the Combat Infantry badge earned in places like North Africa, Italy, a beach in Normandy and across Europe to the German home land, and places encircled by the Pacific Ocean, a Peninsula some called Chosen and even a little strip of coastal land leading up to mountains called Vietnam.

Interestingly they all thought or at least indicated to us that the ability to shoot and hit what was shot at was the cornerstone of being an Infantryman.

We spent hours learning about sight alignment and sight picture, BRASS, positions and trigger control and then finally went to the range. Every Cadet fired about 120 rounds in training under fairly close supervision and then fired a Quarter course 50 foot three position for score.

The improvement of every cadets shooting was noticeable. The Instructors had allowed us to bring in our .22 rifles very early on and all could see we had done much better with the Remington 513T rifles than we had with our whatevers and most could shoot their whatevers better after the training.

We later did dry firing with M-1s and later M-14s and a very few of us actually fired those rifles. Eventually a few M-16A1 were provided and all got to handle the rifles and dry fire and learn the mechanics of those.

By the time I got to Basic training as an enlisted man I have to admit I actually had a decent handle on rifle marksmanship.

I was already a worshiper at the alter of the Front Sight and the Covinent of Sueeze'm Off when I was hearded into a big wooden hanger affair and told to sit at a table with Uncles M-16A1 upon it.

It was pretty much a repeat of high School, but with an M-16A1 instead of a 513T. I got my very first thwack with a cleaning rod with in minutes of entering the room. The Instructor on stage was speaking of how we were to today learn the parts of the M-16A1 and how to disassemble and reassemble it. It was at this point that the Assistant Instructor walking our table row noted my rifle fully broken down and laid out properly for parts inspection.

Being a quick learner and noting those cleaning rods sting mightily across the shoulders I decided I would actually pay attention to what was going on.

What I saw is what I still think can be the MOST effective method of teaching and though called other things basically the Boy Scouts EDGE system that all scouts learn today.

They Explained what they were going to teach us. They Demonstrated how the tasks were to be done. They Guided us through the steps and they allowed us to Experience doing the task correctly and practice it until we mastered it.

This mechanical training made us each very comfortable with the rifle. We carried the rifles every where even though we were not yet using them for anything but mechanical training.

One day we were told to draw weapons and fall in with full field gear. We road march a couple of miles and soon arrived at an area we were told to set up our tents in. After lunch we were directed to bleachers.

We received a new Instructor who explained to us we would be learning to shoot from a supported prone position so that we might soon be able to zero our rifles. There followed some demonstrations and illustrations and then a humorous skit involving one of our Hispanic instructors making an appearance apparently drunk to staggering, wearing his Sunday suit loking as though it was slept in with **** tails out and buttons done wrong and his Drill Baby Campaign hat. Actually he did some amazing shooting, but he also demonstrated what our rifles could do to Helmets, concrete blocks, and ammo cans full of water. This last served to make us all acutely aware that these rifles were not toys and to be darned careful.

We spent the net three days on NOTHING but Basic Rifle Marksmanship. We would do additions range days over the remaining weeks, where we got to try shooting from the fighting positions (in the form of a concrete pipe we stood in with te top level with the ground and a few sand bags for support) and supported kneel from telephone poles. We spent a few hours shooting with out sights taped over so we had to learn to look over the rifle and point shoot from seven to 25 yards (and a few shots like that while walking were part of the qualification) and we learned to fire the rifle in short bursts from the prone with a bipod or just over a sand bag, sometimes with a protective mask on and once at night at targets 25 and 50 meters away.

Near the end of our eight weeks of Basic Training which every soldier, even cooks and clerks and mechanics and tankers went through we went to "Combat Valley" where a buddy team of two guys at a time advanced up the valley supporting one another with live fire on targets appear from 25 to 200 meters away.

So at the end of eight weeks every guy, regardless of whether he might never pick up a rifle again had learned to shoot and hit what he aimed at. Every one passed out of Basic training having displayed the ability to hit half the targets, plus one, that appeared from seven to 300 meters away with three seconds per target exposure.

Remember their are folks on THR that insist that by the end of the VN war that marksmanship was not important. This was then.

Those of us that got sent out to earn a blue shoulder rope to qualify for a place at the pointy end would get additional training, mainly more of the same but also more full auto fire, more un aided night fire, night fire under flares, the use of Night vision scopes, and live fire in up to platoon operations (where I got to see my second military gunshot wound, first having been acciedental self inflicted by a guy talking to me through his foot, what an idiot).

I would go through BRM again in 1976 when I managed to get into college ROTC introduction Camp another eight weeks that included over a week of marksmanship in one form or another.

In 1980 I went through ROTC advanced Camp and found that not all colleges had put the emphasis my own had on marksmanship (my school took the Marksmanship ribbon BTW) but still several days were devoted to Marksmanship training and this for Officer that would be Medical Corp personel, Finance, and what have you in addition to the combat arms folks.

I will say that in 1981 that the Officer Basic Course for Field Artillery spent little time on rifle marksmanship, about a day and a half refresher basically, as they expected everyone to have competed BRM the year before.

Even when I was assigned to the Ash and Trash Battery aka HHB Divarty, made up of cooks, mechanics, clerks and jerks we did annual retraining, fam fire and zeroing and shot a short qualifier course on targets from 25 to 300 meters and if one could not hit that magical half plus one, one was not promotable.

So what were your experiences with military marksmanship?

Other times other services and other countries are all invited.

During the early to mid 1970s the German unit we were partnered with a Mech Infantry out fit (PzGrd) fired their G3 rifles semi auto eight to sixteen rounds per week at a single range on a square range. This constant weekly firing amounted to more than most US troops over a year at the time and only a little less than out own unit that required a qualification every six months, Fam fire/zero every quarter Fam fire and zero within 30 days if going on CAS and annual training.

Sorry for the length.

-kBob
 
The level of marksmanship that is acceptable in the army is disgraceful. MOST Soldiers have no concept of external ballistics- the elevation feature for different ranges that is on the M16A2 and later versions of that rifle isn't even used (it is in fact a USMC specified feature). Soldiers zero at 25 meters and are taught to aim "center mass" of a 20 x 40 sillouete out to 250 meters, then "aim high" at 300 to achieve a hit- SOMEWHERE on that target. There is no "grouping" beyond the 25m zero range. This isn't even marksmanship- this is shooting and slinging rounds into a huge piece of plastic. No one has any idea where those rounds are going beyond that 20 x 40 piece of plastic. But if you hit a little more than half of them, you qualify. if you hit most of them, you are an "expert". They will even tell you so and give you a shiny bobble for your class A's. That entire course of fire is done from either a foxhole or in the unsupported prone. So it is therefore "defensive" in nature. From my time in Special Ops and as a sniper instructor, these low standards and sloppy techniques were the first hurdles that we needed to defeat in our new members in order to "re-train" them to the higher standards expected for combat in our unit (and what you would hope would be standard fare in any unit going to combat). The Marines train on a KD range at various longer distances and numerous positions, and fire into targets with actual score zones. Their qual requires them to have a much better understanding of their weapon and its capabilities than their counterparts in the Army. This type of training is rarely encountered in the Army, and usually only in the course of sniper/DDM type training. By the way, I wasn't in the Marines- my entire career was in the Army.
 
I thought I knew how to shoot as a teenager. Then I joined the Marines and really learned how to shoot. Granted, there may be better training somewhere in the world, but the standard training I received in the Corps was damn good. That was 25 years ago so it may have changed but I still follow those principles today.
 
I cycled through BRM as a 13B in 2003 at Ft. Sill. I was in one of the last cycles of what was then called the "old" basic training, whatever that means, relative to what I don't know. The new guys starting January 2004 were in a new "Warrior Ethos" training. They got stress cards to get I think 15 minutes from a Drill Sergeant if the little mood ring window turned the right color or something. Noticed they got trucks to take their GP mediums and cots to the field, too.

Anyway, we spent one week on BRM and I believe it was the fourth week. It was about the time they finally began to ease off the non-stop "smoke" sessions. The week began with weapon issue, familiarization, cleaning, and some classroom. We then moved to a drill pad and began the dry fire washer test. This is where about 8 or 10 of us all face each other in a circle, prone unsupported and place one section if cleaning rod in the muzzle and have a partner balance a washer on the rod. We had to be able to demonstrate the ability to pull the trigger without the washer falling off. That went on for quite some time with plenty of push ups.

Next we road marched to a range, got a live fire demo with a Drill Sargent firing burst from his forehead and groin to demonstrate the recoil of the M16, or lack thereof. Then on to 25m zero, some people's M16's were keyholing at 25m! The were mostly wore out junkers, mine seemed fairly decent, and there were a few newer looking ones too. Once everyone zeroed, we marched to the qualification range. That alone took an entire day for everyone to get on and off qualified. It was targets from I think 5m(fast Freddie) to 300m. Two courses of fire, one from standing supported in a vertical concrete tube, the other from prone sandbag supported. 20 targets, 20 rounds each course, for a total of 40 rds. All done in LBE and Kevlar.

Then it was time for night fire, fun but kind of a cluster really. I think it was with and without flares. Either way it was experience. The last live fire I remember doing was the "buddy rush" in daylight. We would move in two man teams to an objective, an enemy fighting position in this case, bounding and providing cover fire as each moved forward to cover until we closed on the position. Hand grenades got the nerves going a little, but the buddy rush was probably the most intense. Communication was important but our lanes were probably say 15m apart? can't remember exactly. Muzzle awareness was prime importance and ammunition status was critical as to not leave your buddy exposed. It was valuable training for communicating under simulated battlefield conditions. None of it was specific training, but it was great exposure to what it may be like with stress, gunfire, and actual bullets in the air.

As the OP said, it wasn't really focused on marksmanship. I think as long as you hit 26 out of 40 you qualified rifleman. Up to 36 was Sharpshooter, and 37+ was expert I believe. We did a couple days on crew-served weapons and that was about it.

I've heard now that the Army no longer does a bayonet course or D&C. I've heard people at the Vet Center at the college talk about annual qualifications. We did quarterly, but usually did other stuff with MILES gear in between and even some optics testing as back then they were just really getting stuff like that as general issue, at least for us 13 series! That was black boot/BDU Army, seems so long ago.
 
Unfortunately if we take a look around at the range we will see that not many shooters ever learned BRM. Take away their sand bags or lead sled and see how many people still "claim to shoot sub moa". Of course it would be the fault of their "gun" or ammo, not the lack of fundamental skills. It's too bad....
 
You mean shoot from something other than a bench?

Most folks seem to have given up entirely (where I shoot) from trying anything other than the bench.

I know prone is hard on some of us old goats (makes my neck hurt) but I still practice sitting and kneeling. Offhand too but the results are disappointing for me from the standing position.
 
119- What is going on now in the Army is very little useful training at all. Higher priority is being given to "training" insuring that no one hurts any specific group's feelings. Budgetary constraints and the fact that we are no longer in "active combat" means not much is being invested in resources to SUSTAIN basic skills, which have been learned and refined over the last decade plus of combat. Even in the higher priority units (like combat arms units about to deploy) training and basic resources like ammunition are a mere shell of what was apparently "taken for granted" a decade ago. What certain people don't understand is that YOU GET WHAT YOU PAY FOR. How do you think a professional football team would perform if their practices and budget was cut in half, and no effort was exerted to not just sustain but IMPROVE their game?
 
smithman- people who do everything from the bench or prone supported often can't figure out why they can't hit anything or place poor shots when they have to move to a different position that's not "perfect", whether they are engaging the enemy, hunting delicious animals, or competing in a dynamic sport like 3 gun.
 
Your experience at BRM sounds similar to mine. Was in ROTC for a year, then enlisted some years after that. Took the M16A1 down and set all the parts on the mat before being told to.They couldn't physically whack us by then, though. I just got a verbal dressing down; then later, having not learned my lesson, I CORRECTED the Drill teaching the history of the M16, (and he WAS incorrect), which earned me more verbal derision and a good amount of time in the front leaning rest position. Made it through Basic, went to AIT for 76Y10, Supply and Armorer. Still the showoff, I broke the school record for disassembly and reassembly of the M-60. My reward? Holding it out at arm's length until everyone finished reassembling theirs. I made sure I didn't make the same mistake with the M2HB. :eek:

119er: Watched an ROTC cadre member demo the M16A1 in full auto from the shoulder, the put it up to his groin, intending to fire semi; the look on his face went he let off a 6 or 7 round burst was priceless!:)
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top