Bullpup Conversions from SKS / AK / Saiga?

Status
Not open for further replies.

matsaleh

Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2003
Messages
127
Location
Austin, TX
Ok, so I'm not a gunsmith, as will be immediately evident if you keep reading. However, I am given to flights of fancy, and this came to mind...

I remember reading recently that the Saiga line of rifles are built on the AK platform, but with the trigger installed further towards the rear of the receiver than on a normal AK. I believe there is some kind of extension or linkage between the trigger and the rest of the firing mechanism, which is in the normal position for an AK. I also read various discussions about how this setup can be converted to a normal AK configuration with just a few simple modifications.

Then I mused that a bullpup design differs from a traditional rifle design primarily in that the trigger assembly is to the front of the chamber and magazine, rather than to the rear. I believe that this is the key difference that enables the weapon to integrate the receiver deeply into what is normally considered the "stock" of the rifle, with the magazine and chamber well to the rear, and the trigger in front, allowing a significant shortening of the overall weapon. I know I have to be oversimplifying here - please correct me as needed.

So, my flight of fancy is this:

What if someone took a proven, reliable rifle platform such as an SKS, AK or similar variant, modified the existing trigger to accept some kind of linkage that extends several inches to the front of the chamber and mag assembly, to a new trigger and trigger guard, installed in front of the reciever? Then, designed a molded one-piece stock and forearm to envelop much of the sides and bottom of the receiver, encapsulating the old trigger and linkage assembly, but of course leaving clearance for the magazine, bolt, extractor, etc. to operate?

Could this be done by a tinkerer? Would it be a viable and effective modification for an AK? Would it be cost effective? Would it be legal?

I know that flights of fancy lose their romance when they encounter reality, but if nothing else, I thought this would be an interesting thought experiment.

I'm interested in what those who know much more than I think about this. Cheers.
 
Or perhaps like this...
bp1.jpg


More pics at...

http://www.rifletech.com/bullpup.htm
 
LOL - on a link I followed from the above website, I found an article on the SAR-21, with the comment:

The disadvantages of the bullpup design include the fact that the receiver is next to the shooter's face, which causes discomfort in the event of a ruptured cartridge or magazine explosion.

I'd say that's putting it mildly!
 
Looks like a beeyotch to change mags with the grip there.
Why not move the pistol grip/trigger farther forward, and press the trigger the forward hand? The rear hand can hold the magazine (like the forward hand holds the magazine on a grease gun, MP-5, etc.) Who says you have to press the trigger with the hand closest to you face? I understand standard procedure for firing an AUG, FAMAS, Tavor, SA80, etc, for the off shoulder is to hold the butt stock away from the shoulder so the ejection port is not against the face, holding the magazine with the rear hand and the pistol grip with the forward hand.

I don’t know I’m just asking…
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top