Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

CA Attorney with gun in purse at Vista courthouse acquitted (CCW)

Discussion in 'Legal' started by gunsmith, Jun 5, 2004.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. gunsmith

    gunsmith member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2003
    Messages:
    5,906
    Location:
    Reno, Nevada
    http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/northcounty/20040605-9999-6m5marchant.html
    Dana Littlefield
    UNION-TRIBUNE STAFF WRITER
    June 5, 2004

    VISTA – A North County family law attorney accused of illegally bringing a loaded gun into the Vista courthouse last year was acquitted Thursday of a misdemeanor gun charge.

    A Superior Court jury deliberated for less than two hours before finding Kari Marchant, 47, not guilty of intentionally possessing a firearm at the courthouse. If convicted, she could have been sent to jail for up to one year.

    Marchant's attorney, Brad Patton, argued during the brief trial, which began Tuesday, that his client forgot to remove the handgun from her purse before entering the building in November. Therefore, because she didn't deliberately carry the gun inside the building, she didn't violate state law, he said.

    "The evidence was clear that this was unintentional on Ms. Marchant's part," Patton said in a phone interview Thursday after the ruling.

    Marchant, who has an office in Carlsbad, had a permit to carry a concealed weapon at the time of the incident, according to the county Sheriff's Department. But such permits aren't valid in courthouses.

    In January, Judge Adrienne Orfield reduced the charge against Marchant from a felony to a misdemeanor, saying that although her conduct was "unbecoming a member of the bar," the evidence presented during a preliminary hearing didn't support a felony charge.

    Marchant was arrested Nov. 12 after sheriff's deputies stopped her at a security screening area in the building at 325 S. Melrose Drive. She was released from jail the same day after posting $5,000 bail.

    Attorneys who show the deputies their state bar identification are typically allowed to enter the courthouse without going through security screening. But at the time of her arrest, sheriff's officials said they had received reports that Marchant had carried a gun into the courthouse once before.

    On Oct. 23, the department issued a notice to deputies to "be on the lookout" for Marchant, according to testimony at a previous court hearing.

    Sheriff's Deputy Darryl Leapart testified that he asked Marchant to place her bags on the belt to be X-rayed. When she did so, he noticed what looked like a gun in her purse and determined that it was a loaded, .38-caliber revolver.

    Marchant told Leapart she forgot to leave the weapon in her car before entering the building, the deputy testified.
     
  2. F4GIB

    F4GIB Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2003
    Messages:
    1,165
    Location:
    Midwest
    CCW permits aren't good in courthouses - a "defense free" zone.

    Remember that "funny" video last year of the fat attorney dodging around the small tree as his angry client tried to shoot him? It happened in ... California.
     
  3. buy guns

    buy guns Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2004
    Messages:
    992
    Location:
    Florida
    why does an attorney need an attorney?
     
  4. Hawkmoon

    Hawkmoon Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2004
    Messages:
    3,454
    Location:
    Terra
    The real question is, why was she allowed to "walk" because she "forgot" the gun was in her purse? I don't believe the law says anything about "intent" -- I believe it esentially says "Thou shalt not carry thy handgun into the courthouse." What part of "No" doesn't this attorney understand?

    If any of us proletarians tried to get into a courthouse -- or onto an airplane -- and then just said "Oops, sorry I forgot" when caught, I suspect that we would be looking at hard time and a permanent revokation of RKBA.

    One set of rules for the ruling class, another set of rules for the unwashed masses.
     
  5. 7.62FullMetalJacket

    7.62FullMetalJacket Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2003
    Messages:
    2,991
    Location:
    Cedar City, Utah
    This is good news. A jury let her go. She is part of the unwashed masses. The jury saw that it was a mistake. Sanity.
     
  6. Standing Wolf

    Standing Wolf Member in memoriam

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    24,041
    Location:
    Idahohoho, the jolliest state
    I believe it was Mark Twain who said, “The attorney who represents himself has a fool for a client."

    If forgetting were legitimate grounds for exoneration, I'm sure the nation's prisons would be at least half-empty by now.
     
  7. westex

    westex Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    120
    Location:
    East of El Paso-West of Ft. Worth
    It appears the the legal system once again protects its own. Imagine putting yourself in attorney Marchants place and see if you can envision a similair outcome. Dream on peon.
     
  8. Highland Ranger

    Highland Ranger Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2003
    Messages:
    2,299
    Location:
    New Jersey Highlands
    Another class of people above the law.

    She didn't forget, her attorney credentials mean no screening, why should she obey the law.

    The law is for the commoners.
     
  9. gunsmith

    gunsmith member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2003
    Messages:
    5,906
    Location:
    Reno, Nevada
    geewhiz!

    I FORGOT THAT CCW ISN'T LEGAL IN CA WITHOUT A PERMIT
    yer Honor,can I go now?
     
  10. M1911Owner

    M1911Owner Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2003
    Messages:
    824
    Location:
    Palo Alto, PRK
    According to the story, she was accused of "intentionally possessing a firearm at the courthouse." Seems to me that "I forgot" is a valid defense against that.

    And it was a jury that acquitted her, not the judge, so one can't really claim that this was an example of "the legal system protecting their own." (Although I don't doubt that that may occur.)
     
  11. Pilgrim

    Pilgrim Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    2,957
    Location:
    Nevada, escaped from the PDRK via Idaho.
    So, instead of a friendly, "Counselor, we have heard tales you carry your pistol into court," they set a trap. It causes one to think that Attorney Marchant is not popular with the Sheriff's Department.

    Pilgrim
     
  12. Dex Sinister

    Dex Sinister Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    299
    Location:
    Northern CA. No, S.F. is not "in the north".
    Hmmm - I want a link to that trial transcript. Because, as I've noted before, there isn't a law that specifically excludes CCW guns from courtrooms in CA!

    Of course I can't speak to what the San Diego courthouse has posted at their entrance, but here in northstate CA, the only referenced statute is Penal Code 171b which does does not apply to or affect "a person holding a valid licence to carry the firearm pursuant to" the concealed carry permit codes (PC 12050).

    edited to add: Of course, with CA CCW scheme, the issuing office can add restrictions to the CCW that don't exist in law.

    [BTW, one usually has another attorney represent one's self, because a person who represents himself or herself has a fool for a client, even if one is an attorney. Unless one is extremely unusual, one's emotions tend to interfere with the job at hand. ]



    Dex [​IMG]
     
  13. Dex Sinister

    Dex Sinister Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    299
    Location:
    Northern CA. No, S.F. is not "in the north".
    Here's a link to an earlier story, with an interesting paragraph:

    [emphasis mine]

    Unfortunately, San Diego County doesn't have charges available online, as some other counties do. However, her case # is CN170100

    Dex [​IMG]
     
  14. Henry Bowman

    Henry Bowman Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Messages:
    6,717
    Location:
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Excuse me? Did you not notice that she was charged and and put all the way through a trial? A jury acquitted her.
     
  15. El Tejon

    El Tejon Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    18,085
    Location:
    Lafayette, Indiana-the Ned Flanders neighbor to Il
    Write this day down in the THR archives: a CCWing good gal gets acquitted and THR is upset?:confused:

    We've already had this discussion. It's called mens rea, criminal intent. Misdemeanors, contrary to the THRian view, are not traffic infractions. The prosecution must prove intent and that is what they failed to do.

    Hooray for the Tilecrawler! Hoozah! Hoozah! Hoozah!:D
     
  16. 7.62FullMetalJacket

    7.62FullMetalJacket Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2003
    Messages:
    2,991
    Location:
    Cedar City, Utah
    3 times' the charm :uhoh: Ease up on the caffeine El T :neener:
     
  17. Hawkmoon

    Hawkmoon Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2004
    Messages:
    3,454
    Location:
    Terra
    Noted. The issue is, if that had been you or I rather than a member of the bar, do you think the jury would have acquitted? I don't think so. I think she was acquitted only because she is an attorney. If my gut feeling is correct, this is wrong.

    As to the need to prove intent for a misdemeanor, does that mean they can't cite me for running a stop sign or light unless they can prove that I intended not to stop? What about the guy in Utah (there's a thread active on this right now) who was stopped for DUI and the cops found a gun in his glovebox that he "forgot" was there. IANAL but this doesn't make sense to me.
     
  18. El Tejon

    El Tejon Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    18,085
    Location:
    Lafayette, Indiana-the Ned Flanders neighbor to Il
    Hawk, if her job had anything to do with it, then by your reasoning would not the jury hold her to a higher standard and impute knowledge to her? Always a concern when representing a doc or the like IME. "Well, she should have known."

    As to your alleged Dewey with the pistola, yes, the same defense would be available to him. Even though he is not an untouchable, a member of the bar. (Gee, I like to have immunity, especially from the NFA).

    7.62, as they say, The Badger never sleeps; The Badger always shakes.:D Can you tell I'm anxious to leave or something?:p
     
  19. 7.62FullMetalJacket

    7.62FullMetalJacket Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2003
    Messages:
    2,991
    Location:
    Cedar City, Utah
    Badger, badger, badger, badger........mushroom, mushroom..........


    Is it a one-way trip?
     
  20. El Tejon

    El Tejon Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    18,085
    Location:
    Lafayette, Indiana-the Ned Flanders neighbor to Il
    Ex-girlfriends certainly hope so!:D

    Just bi-annual out-of-state (gun) training.:)
     
  21. ny32182

    ny32182 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2003
    Messages:
    5,765
    Location:
    Clemson, SC
    Why would the JURY care if she was an attorney or not? The jury is a group of random citizens. At best, it was a group of random citizens protecting one of their own. The judge didn't acquit her. The jury did. And keep in mind, its a jury of Kalifornians.

    Second, weather "intent" comes into play is dependant on how the law is written. I've seen it referenced in this thread in two ways:

    1) It is ILLEGAL to carry a gun into the courthouse, CCW or not.
    2) It is illegal to INTENTIONALLY carry a CCW into the courthouse.

    Given that she legitimately forgot the gun was there: she is guilty in case 1, innocent in case 2.

    Likewise, it seems to be ILLEGAL in Utah to have a gun in your glove box with no CCW. Therefore, if the Kali law is written according to case 1, its a good comparison. Case 2; its not.
     
  22. sturmruger

    sturmruger Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2003
    Messages:
    3,055
    Location:
    NW, WI
    I wouldn't care if she was a Kennedy I am glad she got off. I kind of doubt that she really forgot about the gun, but if it worked as a defense then good for her. I like gun toting lawyers allot more then regulars lawyers.
     
  23. M1911Owner

    M1911Owner Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2003
    Messages:
    824
    Location:
    Palo Alto, PRK
    Sturm, I have to agree about the question of whether she really "forgot." Since the story said that the cops were essentially laying in wait for her, it would seem that this was a regular thing for her, not a one-time lapse of memory. So I'm inclined to think that "intent" was, in fact, present. Even if that's the case, I have a hard time working up much anger about someone beating the rap for something I don't think should be illegal in the first place.
     
  24. Carlos

    Carlos Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2003
    Messages:
    1,196
    Location:
    Portland, Oregon
    Great point 1911. Wonder if the Jury actually knew that.

    Certainly would have been prevalent in my mind, as a juror.

    And, the jury acquitted her. :(
     
  25. Henry Bowman

    Henry Bowman Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Messages:
    6,717
    Location:
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Thanks, Sturmruger. El Tejon and I will take that as a complement (I think :uhoh: ).
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page