rc135
Member
My next rifle will be a short-barrellled rifle/carbine, in either .454 (the 16.5" Puma) or in 45/70 Govt. (the 18.5" Marlin Guide Gun in ss).
Question: for a general field gun, with no particular purpose in mind, what are the strong and weaks point of each gun?
I like the fact that the 45/70 can carry larger bullets, including real hot loads (Garrett, BB, etc.), while the .454 is 'limited' to 300 grains or so (are there any .454 bullets larger than 300 grains available??), but I wonder if I can even handle the recoil of the hot, heavy 45/70 loads. Is the ported barrel of the Puma a negative? Is there a material difference in quality 'tween the two carbines? Thanx for your comments.
"The formula "two and two make five," is not without its attractions." -- Dostoevsky
"If it weren't for pickpockets I'd have no sex life at all." -- Rodney Dangerfield
"Things are more like they are now than they ever were before." -- D. D. Eisenhower
"Klaatu. Barada. Nikto." -- “The Day The Earth Stood Still”
Question: for a general field gun, with no particular purpose in mind, what are the strong and weaks point of each gun?
I like the fact that the 45/70 can carry larger bullets, including real hot loads (Garrett, BB, etc.), while the .454 is 'limited' to 300 grains or so (are there any .454 bullets larger than 300 grains available??), but I wonder if I can even handle the recoil of the hot, heavy 45/70 loads. Is the ported barrel of the Puma a negative? Is there a material difference in quality 'tween the two carbines? Thanx for your comments.
"The formula "two and two make five," is not without its attractions." -- Dostoevsky
"If it weren't for pickpockets I'd have no sex life at all." -- Rodney Dangerfield
"Things are more like they are now than they ever were before." -- D. D. Eisenhower
"Klaatu. Barada. Nikto." -- “The Day The Earth Stood Still”