Chuck Taylor's Tactical Carbine/Rifle Course...Bravo (LONG)

Status
Not open for further replies.

atek3

Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2003
Messages
3,025
Location
Cleveland OH
This Saturday and Sunday Several friends and I attended Chuck Taylor’s Tactical Rifle class at the Halo Group, in Concord, CA. It was well worth the 450 dollars I paid. My equipment setup:
Imbel on Imbel FrankenFAL (w/ DSA x-stock and ‘zero climb muzzle break’)
Giles tactical sling (aka ninja sling)
Blackhawk knee and elbow pads
Blackhawk double mag thigh rig
Aussie 7.62 MilSurp ammo
XD-40 in Cendex Nighthawk holster
Streamlight scorpion (we did some night shooting)
Wilderness belt
Tons of sunscreen
Camelbak stealth
Royal Robbins 5.11 Tac. Pants

Course review:

The course was well worth the money. We covered basic rifle handling, sling usage, positions (offhand, kneeling, sitting, prone), mag changing, stoppage clearance, close targets, far targets, small targets, hostages. Most drills were done against a clock to give a sense of time pressure. This was different from the other instructor I’ve learned from, Scott Reitz. He tells students to balance speed and accuracy to go as quickly as possible while still making shots on the vitals. Chuck on the other hand, believes in the speed vs. accuracy debate, but allows fairly realistic windows of opportunity, increasing with distance. So if at say 100 yds. you have three seconds to make the shot from low ready, if you can do it in 2 sec, great, then work on your accuracy to make tighter groups. If you can make a fist sized group in 4 sec, speed up to make the hits faster. Chuck, having scene considerable combat has his biases and makes them clear at the outset. He’s not a fan of electro-optical sights, his rational being things with batteries tend to get murphied (murphy’s law) pretty quickly when in an actual fight. He doesn’t like hanging gizmo’s off of AR-15’s so if you bring a vertical foregrip, laser illuminator, surefire, 14 pound AR, expect some harmless rubs. The good thing is he doesn’t just say, “that’s wrong, do it my way†like some instructors. He takes the time to give ‘constructive criticism’, like ‘you know this isn’t camp perry, lean into the rifle a bit to help counter muzzle rize’, not “ARE YOU LISTENING TO ME MAGGOT, LEAN FORWARD’. We did night shooting and rifle to handgun transitions. Towards the second half of the second day, I could tell the material was being somewhat rushed. I guess we spent too much time eating food and chatting and not enough time learning.

Equipment Review:
One of the great features of a ‘tactical class’ is that you rapidly learn what works and what doesn’t work. My FAL… Worked. Had two stoppages all weekend. The second shot of the weekend was a failure to eject, because I hadn’t set the gas for MilSurp, no problem, adjusted the gas regulator, gun worked great. Second stoppage was one of the last rounds all weekend, I had a failure to go into battery. I pushed the bolt release and the bolt stalled about half way. Either the gun was just really really dirty and underlubed, or the buffer spring is old. Either is possible.
Also, during the night shooting I learned that the rear aperature of the FAL is horrible for dusk and other lower light shooting. The optical battle sights totally owned the night shooting. Using the Streamlight, however, I was able to engage the targets without difficulty. However, without my support arm actively supporting the forearm of the rifle I got really tired really fast.
The DSA x-stock and my face, just don’t jive. My cheek is pretty badly bruised from the repeated pounding of a 308 cartridge. I’m either going to have to modify it myself or buy a new stock. Any recommendations?
The FSE trigger group, while not as nice as the trigger on my match rifle, was wholly serviceable.
The front sight of my imbel was jammed into the lowest position and so I had to hold under all weekend which was mildly annoying but still alright.
I found myself carrying my rifle slung over one of my shoulders far more often than carrying it ‘tactically’ in front of me. Also I lamented the fact that I couldn’t hasty sling with it for better support when we were practicing head shots. The one time it shined was in the handgun transitions. Then I simply threw the rifle out of my way, drew the XD, then POP POP, nailed the target. However given the rarity of such a situation where one would actively drop a rifle in favor of a pistol I think I might install a traditional military sling.
Comments on other peoples rifles:
AR’s were very fast. My FAL, being about 3 pounds heavier was a lot slower to bring into action than the short barreled M4gery’s. Two others had FAL’s, and seemed to have few problems. Regarding the optical battle sights, when they worked, they shined, easily and quickly engaging small targets. But, most people had issues of one sort or another, failed batteries, uncorrectable zeroing problems, and other stuff. The scout M1A’s looked very cool, but had a lot of malfs due to dirty chambers. They had to be ‘kick started’ numerous times in the afternoon, maybe due to bad ammo or lube, I dunno. Two bolt gunners took the class, one was a scouterized rem 700, very cool, only downside… 100 dollar HS precision proprietary 308 mags…not cool. Other was a Remington 788 in 223 w/ an aimpoint sight. Fast rifle, but 4 round mag capacity made him a lot slower than the military style autoloaders. A couple of people w/ M1 Carbines and garand’s rounded out the class.
 
How'd the guys with the Garands and Carbines do?

I'm planning on taking a good rifle class sometime in the next year, but I still need to decide what rifle to bring. I have a Azex Arms FAL, a couple real reliable and accurate Garands, a M-1 Carbine and a AK-74 clone, all with iron sights. Any suggestions?
 
any of those would be excellent. Decide which one you would prefer to be proficient w/ (aka which one you'd grab in an emergency)

atek3
 
ATEK3: Thanks for the review. How much time was spent on war stories?

I want QBG's review, Too. ;)
 
believe it or not, the 'war story factor', "Back when I was fighting in rhodesia..." "This one time while battling the moro's in the phillipines...", was WAY less than the tac. handgun class. Seems like we spent a bit more time talking about really random stuff (shootout at the OK corral, what a great general patton was, how nuking japan was the greatest idea, how important stomping iraq was...) you get the drift. (personally I'd have taken slightly embellished war stories over just talking about war in general)

atek3
 
A lever action Winchester 94 will also suffice in Chuck's class.
 
chuck always tells the ancedote about the fellow with the 1894 lever gun who cleaned the clocks of these HSLD types :)

atek3
 
Atek3 covered most of the high points.

Some minor observation: I liked how Chuck covered the different shooting positions- the pros and cons of each one and his variations on the standard ‘kneeling, sitting and prone’ (Knee pads REALLY helped as we were shooting on coarse gravel.) I discovered that for most of the firing drills, the Giles sling I have on my M4 type was an excellent choice, but is very difficult to use from the prone position. Also it almost makes the ‘high ready’ position impossible unless you unsling. When doing the ‘target right/left’ drills we started from the ‘high ready’ position as to not sweep the shooter next to us. But in the real world I’d be in ‘low ready’ pretty much all the time.

Optical sights RULE the field within 35 yards. DVDtracker had a Trijicon reflex on his AR, there was one compact Acog, and three Eotech holosights. All the shooters with optical sights were hitting on the money inside that 35 yard envelope; outside that range I found that there was enough time to use the plain iron sights on my AR to full advantage, inside that range an optical sight is really hard to beat for fast target acquisition. I’ve been using a Aimpoint CompML/M68 day optic on another of my ARs but have been trying to get away from anything that needs batteries as they always seem to go out at the wrong time. Example: I use a set of ProEar Linear Elite electronic ear-muffs (and highly recommend them as hearing range commands with normal plugs or muffs is a little difficult at best) and they worked fine the weekend before the class. Come Saturday morning, first day of the class, the left side were dead. SO for the rest of the day I was hearing in mono. No big deal, just annoying. Also during one of the firing strings, one of the holosight users had his batteries die so he was stuck point shooting. Not fun.

I need to practice more off hand shooting with my ‘tactical carbines’. I think I’ve fallen into the trap of shooting from the bench too much. I have bench rest rifles, but a 14.5†(w/permanently attached flash suppressor) barrel AR is not a bench rifle and I think I must have forgot that somewhere along the line. Practice practice practice.

I was especially impressed with Chuck’s magazine change drill: he is a gigantic advocate of keeping your empty magazines for later reloading as opposed to dropping them on the deck. There were several suggestions as to how to retain them after ejecting them; have your shirt tucked in and stuff them in there, put them in your cargo pockets (if you have them) and Chuck’s suggestion, which I like the best; use a dump pouch or as he suggested, a Claymore mine pouch.

I had inquired about this very subject in a previous thread and all the posters seem to be in agreement with Chuck. Hold on to those magazines. Only drop it if it’s a definite absolute life or death situation.

Another point about magazine changes which I appreciated, and that seems obvious when you think about it is training to do the mag change but NOT firing. That is drop the empty magazine, secure it somehow, get the loaded magazine out and inserted and charge the rifle but DO NOT FIRE as part of the drill. The reasoning behind this is obvious in retrospect. Magazine changes should be a muscle memory function, something that your body can and will do automatically in a high stress situation when your fine motor skills go out the window. But firing should ALWAYS be a deliberate act, not a conditioned reflex. If you train to fire right after the magazine change you are making it part of the magazine change drill- and a shot right after changing magazines may not be necessary. Good point. And one that I had not really considered in my practice up until the class.

In quickly and efficiently changing a magazine and charging the chamber, the AR had no equal in the class. Everyone with an AR was way out in front of the class in speed. (Many props to the shooters that brought the bolt actions and the lone Garand).

Transition drills were straight forward. Here again the shooters using a tac sling or some variation of the three point sling had a tremendous advantage over the shooters with the standard sling/carrying straps. Tac sling shooters were able to simply let go of the rifle and pull it to the off side, then draw the handgun and fire. The shooters with the standard slings had to either just drop their rifles to the ground, or go kneeling and put down the rifle before drawing the handgun.
One area that the AR did not work out so well (at least for me and DVDtracker) was shouldering the rifle and firing starting from a slung over the shoulder position. The AR has that pistol grip and magazine sticking out of it, not to mention the bolt stop, and all these protrusions like to catch on your clothes as you pull the rifle off your shoulder and assume a firing position. The ‘standard’ rifle shooters (the bolt action guys, the Garand shooter and the guys with M1 Carbines) seemed to have an easier time with that drill.

All in all an excellent course, and I would highly recommend it.
 
QBG: Thanks.

Were there any snickers at the guys with M1 Carbines? How did they fair in the various drills other than shouldering?
 
Hey Sven- the M1 carbine shooters did fine as far as I can tell; I saw one failure that was user error (didn't seat the magazine fully). And you could tell that manuvering that short, light little carbine was easy as pie. Chuck stressed that using the .30 carbine sound required an even higher degree of skill in regard to shot placement (ie. what Chuck called the 'occular/cranial region' a delicate way of saying 'headshot').
 
In front of the carbine guys no snickering whatsoever. In fact the carbines were very fast (about as fast as the AR's best i can reckon). Chuck, behind the scenes, really really doesn't like 30 carbine as a cartridge. The M1-carbine is worse than an AR and arguably worse than a mini-14. You woulda had a good time in the class sven.

Re: 7.62 vs. 5.56, it almost felt like chuck was trying to reassure some of the 30 cal. guys that going w/ a full power cartridge was worth the added bulk and unwieldiness of the non-AR-15-type rifle. He said the 5.56 just doesn't have the greatest stopping power. However, the work of the Facklerites suggest at under 200 yds. the M193 cartridge is much better than the M80 cartridge even though the M80 has almost twice the muzzle energy. Is this true or bunkem?

atek3

PS quarterbore was correct in the speed department, the FAL's and m1-type rifles weren't as fast.
 
have to disagree QBG. Chuck really goes into the difference between Craniocular cavity and head in the Handgun class because there it matters. Long story short, only a CO shot has a near unity chance of instantly stopping the BG. shots outside that region can glance off, strike useless tissue, etc. Cause a lot of bleeding yes, instant stop... not necessarily.


atek3
 
QBG wrote, "The shooters with the standard slings had to either just drop their rifles to the ground, or go kneeling and put down the rifle before drawing the handgun."

Interesting. Did Chuck cover slinging back over the head, or merely bringing the rifle close to the offside while drawing and engaging with only the strong hand? Did he have opinions about these options?

EricO
 
Not to hijack the thread about this particular course, but I have a couple comments in general.
Optical Sights. I have an Aimpoint ML2 on one of my ARs and I was sold on it from the beginning. As you mentioned, it is much faster, and it is the only way to go at night. But I have to disagree with your statement about distances over 35 yards. I still think it has it all over iron sights at any range. Just this morning I spent about three hours at a rifle range shooting prone from 200 yards. I had two ARs; an SP1 with standard A1 iron sights, and my main AR with the Aimpoint and also ARMS back up irons. I alternated shooting the Aimpoint, SP1 and the back up irons. I did significantly better with the optic every time, even at 200 yards. I personally think the battery thing has been way overblown. In the first place on my ML2 Aimpoint rates the battery life to be between 1000 and 10,000 hours depending on the brightness setting. If the battery fails I have a number of other options to fall back on. First of all, I have a spare battery right on the sight. I do have to install it, but it only takes a minute. Secondly I can use the optic tube in conjunction with the front sight with the tube being like a big ghost ring. And finally, I still have fully funtional iron sights. So, I don't see the downside; if you are partial to iron sights, I got 'em, AND the optic. I have been using the same battery ever since I bought the sight; this includes two five day carbine classes where it was turned on all day for five days and one night shoot for each class along with a whole lot of plinking and practice. I am getting ready to take the Gunsite 556 Advanced Carbine class next month, so just as a preventitive maintainance proceedure, I changed out my Aimpoint battery. It should be good to go for another couple years, but if I see that I am going to be using it extensively for a class or whatever, I will put a fresh battery in, but to make sure.
Tac Sling: I am also totally sold on the single point tac sling. I personally don't see a whole lot of down side to them.

Glad you had fun, I would jump at the chance to take a class with Chuck Taylor. He would have fun with me, because I have an AR with all the bling bling. With every item mounted on the gun it still only weighs 8 pounds. I am not sure how he would prove to me that this stuff isn't needed. I have taken two carbine classes so far and they proved to me that if you didn't have it, you wished you did.
 
tac sling, aimpoint, arms back up, whats so bling bling?

but i really liked your counterpoint on optics, may have to try that one.

atek3
 
Well that is only the beginning. I have the Wilderness tac sling with a Daniel Defense attachment plate, then I have a hard chromed extractor with the Wolf extra power spring, and the KAC RAS II, and the Aimpoint 910A light (which is usually removed); to me, it isn't bling bling, but to someone that advocates nothing but iron sights, it is loaded.
 
he's not clint smith you know ("Two weeks after the balloon goes up, men with iron sights shall rule the world"). Chuck likes optical battle sights, he just understands their limitations. In his humble opinion, take it or leave it, stuff that uses batteries in general is prone to murphy's law more and gets FUBAR faster than trusty irons. I mean he's willing to deal with that bias to use Surefires which he LOVES for tactical situations. And he even uses laser rangefinders near-exclusively in long range precision shooting. So he's not totally anti gizmo. But just because a gizmo gets a 5 page spread in guns and ammo, he's not going to leap out and throw it on his AR. Get my and his drift?

atek3
 
He takes the time to give ‘constructive criticism’, like ‘you know this isn’t camp perry, lean into the rifle a bit to help counter muzzle rize’, not “ARE YOU LISTENING TO ME MAGGOT, LEAN FORWARD’.

Gee, what kind of instructor would do THAT? :D

When you say optical sights, do you mean the battery powered ones or the tritium ones too? (Reflex, Accupoint, Tripower, etc.)
 
when chuck said 'optical battle sight' that pretty much meant "not iron and not highpower scope". So reflex, holosight, compact acog, IER scopes, would by his defintion be 'optical battle sights'. Batteries or no.

atek3
 
Guess I should chime in too since I was there. :cool:

My AR has a Trijicon Reflex II with the 12MOA triangle and I agree, it pretty much OWNS over iron sights. The farthest we shot was about 80-90yds, but it's probably decent out to 200yds. It's tritium so there are no batteries to worry about. For close-in thoracic cavity hits, just place that fat triangle in the middle of the chest and take your shot. When you get further out, you use the top-point of the triangle as your aiming point. I'm very pleased with this sight. I have an ARMS 40 for backup irons. Actually, those helped me out even though I wasn't shooting with them. My Reflex II started shooting right, so I was able to flip up my rear sight and realign my optical sight to the irons without have to shoot some rounds to do it. Pretty handy.

I think you guys covered the rest pretty well. I have a Wilderness 3-point sling on my AR and would vary my presentations with it slung and unslung during the first day to make sure I tried everything. I switched to my basic Garand sling for the second day.

Chuck has a very good method for quickly getting into a sitting shooting position. Take a small step towards the target, "bunny hop" and cross your feet and sit right down. Very fast if you can do it. I'm a big guy and not very bendable so it was hard for me to get into quickly, but I find the sitting position a very stable shooting platform. Chuck doesn't find prone very practical as you often can't see what you're shooting at.


FYI atek, I noticed that you were still doing the "High Power lean" towards the end of the class. Something to keep an eye on.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top