(CO) Parents protest military statue

Status
Not open for further replies.

Drizzt

Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2002
Messages
2,647
Location
Moscow on the Colorado, TX
Parents protest military statue
Parents oppose image, location of memorial

By Joey Bunch and Carlos Illescas
Denver Post Staff Writers

Article Launched: 04/05/2007 01:00:00 AM MDT


A Littleton group says the depiction of Navy SEAL Danny Dietz, killed in '05, glorifies violence and is too close to three schools. (Special to The Post)A group of Littleton parents is opposing the design and location of a memorial to a fallen local Navy SEAL, Danny Dietz, who died in combat in Afghanistan two years ago.

They say the statue, depicting Dietz clutching an automatic rifle, glorifies violence. In Berry Park, it would be within blocks of three schools and two playgrounds.

"I don't think young children should be exposed to that in that way - unsupervised by their parents or any adults," said Emily Cassidy, one of the mothers.

The parents have circulated fliers opposing the design and location of the statue at the southeast corner of South Lowell Boulevard and West Berry Avenue, in a triangle formed by Goddard Middle School, Community School
for the Gifted and Centennial Elementary School.

They sent a letter to school board members, nearby residents, members of parent-teacher organizations and others to protest "the statue's particular location."

Linda Cuesta, the parent of a child who was at Columbine High School during the deadly April 1999 shootings, said that memory "colors everything in my life," but she is sympathetic to the Dietz family.

"As much as it breaks my heart to do this, we have to weigh the effect of the statue in this particular place against the family's feelings," she said.

"Who wins here? It's a tough situation."

Dietz's father said the family is devastated by the uproar.

"It broke our hearts," said Dan Dietz, who still lives in the area. "My son was fighting for her freedom to do exactly what she is doing. She put my son in the same category as Columbine. How does she have the audacity to do that?"

On June 28, 2005, Dietz and three other Navy SEALs were ambushed by al-Qaeda guerrillas. Dietz, 25, severely wounded, fought off attackers for more than 45 minutes, allowing one of his team members to escape.

Dietz received the Navy Cross, the Navy's second-highest medal.

"The people who have never served in the armed forces are always the ones who speak the loudest against what the armed forces have done," said Allan Stone of the Pat Hannon VFW Post No. 4666 in Littleton, which helped raise nearly $42,000 for the sculpture.

Cassidy said the opposition is in no way meant to offend the family or denigrate Dietz's service.

"We have absolutely no issue with the family, and we have only good feelings for the soldier and what he did for this country," Cassidy said.

Kelli Narde, spokeswoman for the city of Littleton, said complaints about the statue are arriving "at the eleventh hour," too late to change the statue, which has already been cast.

"We're proceeding with the plan," she said.

"This opposition has come as a complete surprise; it's been such a public process."

Narde said Cuesta is the only person to formally approach the council about relocating the statue. It will be unveiled in Berry Park on July 4, the second anniversary of the recovery of Dietz's body on a mountainside in Afghanistan.

Cassidy and Cuesta said the memorial was no secret, but the parents opposing it had no idea the rifle would be a focal point.

And while war memorials nationwide include rifles, swords, cannons and battleships, "trends are changing," said Cuesta, who has advocated on behalf of stronger gun laws.

Sculptor Robert Henderson of Cañon City said Dietz is holding the rifle in a "parade-rest" position on one knee, somewhere between "at attention and at ease."

He hopes schoolchildren could use it in their studies, in discussing war.

"Every piece that I make, somebody is not going to like it," Henderson said. "Most of the people do, but you can't satisfy everybody."

http://www.denverpost.com/ci_5595985
 
maybe if the parents were more involved with their kids, the wouldnt have to worry about a statue giving them images of violence.

"Look jimmy, the statue represents what our soldiers have given up for our personal freedom and for our country."

"really daddy?"

"yes son"

he will never see the statue to be personifying violence, but merely scrafice and loyalty.
 
These are the same type of parents that raised Dylan and Eric, don't forget that. Right there in good old Littleton.


Clueless parents are the #1 danger to this country today.
 
Is that town infested with California refugees or something? This really doesn't sound like the Colorado I knew a long time ago.
 
And we call this the High Road.
i hope a vet kicks them in the face
Pretty low road if you ask me. Its sad to see so many people on this site forget that the constitution protects everyones rights...equally. The parents have every right to protest the statue if they don't like it. Just as you have the right to call them all types of names on the internet. I wonder about some people on this site.
 
Did they describe "parade rest" properly there? Not sure it's right.

Idiots. Wait until now to fuss about it, and I suppose the local statue of Daniel Boone or Lewis and CLark focus on the muskets they carry.
 
Couldn't..... couldn't they have made the statue having him holding a flower instead of a rifle...? :barf:

Just for the children... :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
 
Hero's Statue: Should It be Built?
Last Edited: Thursday, 05 Apr 2007, 12:25 PM MDT

by DavidM


A group of parents in Littleton has expressed concern about a statue that is going to be built in honor of Danny Dietz.


He was a Navy SEAL who died in Afghanistan while saving the lives of his other team members, the U.S. military said. He received the Navy Cross for his actions.


The parents group says the statue depicts Dietz clutching an automatic rifle. It will be built in Berry Park, which is within a few blocks of three schools and two playgrounds. The group says the statue glorifies violence.

Dietz' family members say they are upset about the uproar. So are the people who raised $42,000 for the statue.

What do you think? Should it be built? Should its design and/or location be changed?


COMMENT ON THIS for the newspaper at the link. Registering takes less than a minute.

http://www.myfoxcolorado.com/myfox/...n=2&locale=EN-US&layoutCode=TSTY&pageId=3.2.1
 
You know, I bet if the statue was of a phallus, the school would have OKed it as freedom of speech and they'd fight like the dickens to keep it up and standing.
 
funny, as technically you cant be in parade rest while under arms.

This comment really hit home with me -

"The people who have never served in the armed forces are always the ones who speak the loudest against what the armed forces have done," said Allan Stone of the Pat Hannon VFW Post No. 4666 in Littleton, which helped raise nearly $42,000 for the sculpture."

Aint it the truth. The types who were always protesting the recruitment offices when I was joining the Army were the last people who would ever join.

And of course the best part - "And while war memorials nationwide include rifles, swords, cannons and battleships, "trends are changing," (To who? You, in your own little Cindy Sheehan world?) said Cuesta, who has advocated on behalf of stronger gun laws."

Guess they should have flowers in their hands? How about a Bill Clinton statue with a "hell no i wont go" sign? Or perhaps they could have had him making out with another male solider instead?
 
I don't really see the big deal since this is how government is supposed to work. Group A wants to put a statue in a public park. Group B objects to said statue once the design is unveiled. Now it's up to the area's elected officials to decide whether the statue should be placed somewhere else.

I guess some people just like to work themselves into an uproar.

TexasRifleman said:
These are the same type of parents that raised Dylan and Eric, don't forget that. Right there in good old Littleton.

Quite opposite really, Dylan and Eric's parents were pretty hands-off and wouldn't have cared in the slightest. In their minds, these parents are trying to prevent their children from becoming such a headline story.

Ratzinger_p38 said:
funny, as technically you cant be in parade rest while under arms.

Huh? I've been given that command many times while carrying a rifle, especially during ceremonies.
 
@CannibalCrowley

I realized that almost as soon as posted that...

Its been a few years since Ive been out :eek:
 
Think about this, the song America ("Oh, beautiful - for spacious skies"...etc.), if you've considered the words carefully lately, in days to come will soon, if not now, be considered by many to be politically incorrect and offensive to some. It is no wonder that the statue offends some. It is a shame and I don't know what to do about it.
 
The SEAL died in service to his country. Violence is part of the nature of military conflict. The rifle is one of the most important tools of the trade. Maybe the parents should teach their children about human conflict and violence rather than hiding it from them. Parents today aren't helping their kids by hiding the truth of the world from them.
 
Kind of reminds me in a roundabout way of a recruit doing split option training. Basic during the summer between Junior and Senior High years and AIT following HS graduation. This soldier stated unequivicably that they would not carry a firearm or shoot someone. This was an MP unit.

No, child, soldiers do not carry firearms, they do not go into combat and they do not die for the rest of us. :banghead:

That statue needs to be a central point of the park and I hope that statue is larger than life and illuminated 24/7. Too many people forget or dismiss the sacrifices made to build this country into what it is today.
 
Quite opposite really, Dylan and Eric's parents were pretty hands-off and wouldn't have cared in the slightest. In their minds, these parents are trying to prevent their children from becoming such a headline story.


No, these parents are taking something that is harmless and making a target out of it because it's an easy target for them to further their political beliefs.

This is not something that would truly impact their children.

This is not one of the "for the children" activities. This is Liberal activism under cover of "for the children" just like all thier anti gun activities.

Did you not read the story? The only reason they don't want the statue is because he's holding a gun.

And while war memorials nationwide include rifles, swords, cannons and battleships, "trends are changing," said Cuesta, who has advocated on behalf of stronger gun laws.

This has absolutely nothing to do with helping children, this is anti-gun politics. PERIOD.

The children have zero to do with this.

While the parents are out protesting the war, guns and some stupid statue their kids are at home unsupervised.
 
That statue needs to be a central point of the park and I hope that statue is larger than life and illuminated 24/7. Too many people forget or dismiss the sacrifices made to build this country into what it is today.

American appears to have less people each decade willing to stand on the wall with a rifle, at some point if we continue on this path the country will be taken without a shot fired. :(
 
Anyone here remember when Canada proposed to build a statue dedicated to Vietnam draft dodgers?

Maybe the mother in this article would prefer that.

(and no I dont agree with the draft, but cmon, Canada loves all our filth - Loyalists and draft dodgers :))
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top