Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Colt 1911 without rampant colt emblem

Discussion in 'Handguns: Autoloaders' started by Jxgunnet, Aug 9, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Jxgunnet

    Jxgunnet Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2012
    Messages:
    5
    I have what appears to be an authentic Colt 1911 pistol that has a serial # of C88975 which was manufactured in 1917 based upon the #. One thing leads me to question that it is a real Colt is that it is missing the rampant colt emblem on the slide. Did Colt make any 1911's without the emblem? How can I determine if this is a genuine Colt 1911?
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Aug 10, 2012
  2. Jim Watson

    Jim Watson Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    22,344
    Well, you could post some pictures and we could talk about it.
     
  3. Auto426

    Auto426 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2010
    Messages:
    473
    There are several reasons why the Colt emblem may not be there. You could have a mix-master pistol with a Colt frame and a slide from another manufacturers, or the pistols could have been refinished during it's lifetime and the pony could have been polished into non-existence.

    As Jim said, photos of the gun in question would be a big help.
     
  4. Jxgunnet

    Jxgunnet Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2012
    Messages:
    5
    I just added some pics of the 1911.
     
  5. TonyT

    TonyT Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2004
    Messages:
    1,353
    Location:
    Michigan
    Youir pistol would have been manufactured in 1917. It appears to have been refinished and buffed in the process. The markings on both sides of the slide appear to be correct for the time period except for the missing rampart colt emblem.
     
    Last edited: Aug 10, 2012
  6. Jxgunnet

    Jxgunnet Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2012
    Messages:
    5
    How can you tell that it has been refinished?
     
  7. TonyT

    TonyT Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2004
    Messages:
    1,353
    Location:
    Michigan
    The second photo shows what appears to be circular polishing marks, the letters are less distinct and the bluing is somewhat purple- it could be the nature of the photos. I corrected my post to state it appears to be refinished.
     
  8. tipoc

    tipoc Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2006
    Messages:
    2,880
    It appears to be refinished. At some point the gun was reblued by an aftermarket blueing outfit. In the process it was over polished some, the normally clear and sharp lines around the edges of the gun and around the stamping were rounded. The tone of the blueing is also off from standard Colt blue of the period. You can also see the polishing marks or at least what looks like them in the pic.

    You may want to drop by the one or more of the 1911 forums and see pics there of military 1911s from the same time frame.

    This will lesson the value of the gun some. But does not effect it as a shooter.



    tipoc
     
  9. Jxgunnet

    Jxgunnet Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2012
    Messages:
    5
    That was my original thought as well based upon the depth of the bluing that is on the gun and the lack of the Colt emblem but there aren't any circular marks or anything that I can see that points to it being buffed out, filed, polished, etc. The purple color in the 2nd photo is from WD40 residue and handprints.

    I am still leaning towards the gun being refinished but can anyone answer the question about Colt manufacturing any guns without the Rampant Colt emblem?

    Are there any sure-fire methods to determine if the piece has been refinished?
     
  10. Jim K

    Jim K Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2002
    Messages:
    17,622
    At that time, the pony would have been on the left rear of the slide, not in the center. Those were pretty lightly stamped (hand stamped using a jig) and the marking was probably removed in the polishing when the gun was reblued. (It was heavily polished and reblued; there is no doubt about that.)

    Note that the gun is a Government Model, a commercial gun, not a military contract pistol, so researchers will have to be sure to get the right data for comparison.

    Just FWIW and FYI (don't you just love those initials?) on the reblue. Look at the grips. They have not been refinished and show the obvious use and wear of the gun before it was polished and reblued. Also, the gun shows the rounded corners, dished markings and blurred lines almost always seen on reblued guns, especially those that were heavily rusted prior to being polished. Anyone wanting to buy a gun like that and is suspicious should ask to remove the grips. Polishers very rarely bother to work on the areas under the grips or inside the magazine well, and quite often signs of deep pitting will be in evidence in those areas.

    Jim
     
    Last edited: Aug 10, 2012
  11. Jxgunnet

    Jxgunnet Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2012
    Messages:
    5
    Thank you for all of your comments and input. It looks like I have a good 1911 shooter to take to the range!
     
  12. tipoc

    tipoc Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2006
    Messages:
    2,880
    Interesting but in the full photo the slide looks too long, likely just an illusion from the angle of the pic.

    A quick look at the book "Colt .45 Government Models (Commercial Series)" by Clawson shows the following:

    The slide from this period should have a Colt pony on it. In this case where the patent dates are justified on the left side of the slide, the pony should be on the left rear of the slide adjacent to the hammer. It therefore may have been polished off. A close look under different lighting might show traces of it there.

    The pony would not have been in a circle. In late 1917 the emblem was moved to the center of the patent dates and at the same time the type of the markings was changed, meaning the style of the type face.. This gun has the earlier type.

    Note also that the hammer is wrong for guns of this period. It should be the wide hammer. This one is a WWII type hammer first use to cut down on production time during the war and common ever since. So the hammer was swapped out at some point.

    It also looks from the pics that we can see the pitting under the bluing where the repolish could not get it out.

    tipoc
     
  13. JohnBT

    JohnBT Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    13,233
    Location:
    Richmond, Virginia
    Is that a horse I see at 800% zoom?
     

    Attached Files:

  14. tipoc

    tipoc Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2006
    Messages:
    2,880
    Certainly could be. In good light it should be visible to the eyeball or with a magnifying glass.

    tipoc
     
  15. Grayrock

    Grayrock Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2003
    Messages:
    1,412
    Location:
    The great state of TEXAS
    I had one very similar to that. Mine was made in 1920. I do not recall ever seeing a Rampant Colt on the slide. If it hadn't been stolen :cuss: I could go look at it. ( http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=526156 ) To my knowledge, the one I had had never been refinished.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page