What besides the looks 'which are nice' is the purpose of the Dragoon in the modern day. It doesn't pack any more power than a 1858 Remington 'cylinder size is the same'. And weighs more and is unwieldy.
Now i'm trying to think objectively so i'm excluding historical provenance and personal preference. And i'm not saying i dislike the gun because i actually really like it. But i always see people say it's better than the walker. And yes i know that was true 150 years ago when the walkers were grenading. But in the Modern day i think the walker is a much superior gun to own if you had to choose between the two. Its size and weight actually serves a purpose.
So to be clear i'm just responding to the debate and trying to say 'in my opinion' the walker in the modern day is vastly superior. Which contradicts about all the forum posts i ever read about the walker. It's longer barrel and more importantly cylinder give it unrivaled power. While the dragon is just heavy to be heavy. Thoughts?
Now i'm trying to think objectively so i'm excluding historical provenance and personal preference. And i'm not saying i dislike the gun because i actually really like it. But i always see people say it's better than the walker. And yes i know that was true 150 years ago when the walkers were grenading. But in the Modern day i think the walker is a much superior gun to own if you had to choose between the two. Its size and weight actually serves a purpose.
So to be clear i'm just responding to the debate and trying to say 'in my opinion' the walker in the modern day is vastly superior. Which contradicts about all the forum posts i ever read about the walker. It's longer barrel and more importantly cylinder give it unrivaled power. While the dragon is just heavy to be heavy. Thoughts?