• You are using the old Black Responsive theme. We have installed a new dark theme for you, called UI.X. This will work better with the new upgrade of our software. You can select it at the bottom of any page.

Compact rifle scopes? Like Barska "Contour" series?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Bill_Rights

Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2009
Messages
679
Location
Annandale, Virginia USA
I don't know what it is, but I just prefer the look of a smallish scope on most rifles. I only shoot 50-200 yds and not for competition, so I am looking at this Barska:

Barska_Contour_AC10634.jpg

This unit is a 3-9x42mm "Contour" AC 10634 model, and it is only 9.8" long. You can get the deets here:
http://www.shopbarska.com/Tactical_Scopes-BARSKA_3_9x42_IR_CONTOUR_SCOPE_PICATINNY_BASE.html
On this web page, Barska also refers to it as the "Hornet" series - dunno why two names....

Does anybody have experience with this scope for mid-range general shooting?

How about Barska in general? Where are these scope manufactured (I know their HQ is in California somewhere)?

What about compact scopes as a catagory? This can't be the only manufacturer that makes something in this form factor. Anybody else favor them? Any big down-side?

Thanks!
 
To say Barska is of marginal quality would be an understatement.

There are a number of companies that make long eye relief scopes. Many have a significantly superior product to offer.
 
OK. Thanks for the warning.

What would be a quality scope in a similar size/magnification range? I don't see too many that look like it, but there have got to be some.
 
I bet he would appreciate it if you linked to a couple. I would be interested as well. I have a Millet "Buck" scope that is 1.5 X 5 X 32 that is on my Mini 14. It is compact and is good for short range stuff. A bit better scope than Barska, but not top end by a long shot. I don't think they make it anymore.
 
I would like some links.

Re-reading, Redneck mentioned eye relief. I was thinking more of wanting less front over-hang. I re-looked at the eye relief of the Barska above. It is 3.9". This is about average. I would say 3.5" is what I see listed most of the time. Here're the other specs:

Model # AC10634
Magnification 3-9x
Objective Lens 42mm
Waterproof Yes
Fogproof Yes
Reticle 4A, Mil-Plex IR
Exit Pupil 14.0-4.6mm
Optical Coating Fully Coated
Field of View (ft@100yds/m@100m) 36.7/12.3@3x, 12.5/4.2@9x
Eye Relief 3.9 inch
Click Value 1/4"
Adjustment Knob Adj. rheostat settings, side adj. windage and elevation, range and trajectory adj.
Tube Diameter 1 inch
Finish Black Matte
Weight 16 oz.
Lenght 9.8 inch
Included Accessories Mounting Rings, Battery and Lens Cloth
Warranty Manufacturer Limited Lifetime
 
Do you need much/any magnification for your 50-200yd shooting?

I know this doesn't in any way answer your question, but:

The general "red dot" family (including holo sights) includes a bunch of options in the 1x to 2x range that are all quite compact. I don't know what you will be shooting at but magnification is IMO optional at <200 yards for anything except varmints.
 
Acorn,
Yes, the NcStar equivalent of the Barska above also costs $80 at OpticsPlanet - I guess that's the going rate for the bottom end (Oh no! Somebody will prove that there is even a lower bottom - don't bother)

Ed Ames,
I think you are right. For the same money, I could get a not-bottom-end red-dot/holo, and the 1x versions give great field of view. A few more bucks and maybe I'd get a good one.

I am intrigued by the holographic sights but confused by the huge number of choices. What're the top two or three things to look for?
 
I have had good luck with Barska; not so with sh@#$t... I mean NC star.
I did get one bad barska once. the sniper series is supposedly an upgrade in clarity and reliability as well... I have no experience with this particular scope however. I currently have 3 of the monster 6x24's though...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top