Orion8472
Member
- Joined
- May 8, 2008
- Messages
- 3,638
I have a Kahr CW9 that I am considering trading for a Bersa CC. There are strong and weak points for both. I appreciate your input.
The Kahr shoots 9mm [which is said to be a better defensive round than .380acp]. 7+1 capacity compared to the 8+1 of the Bersa. Both have a flat profile. The slide of the Kahr, specifically the back part, isn't nearly as concealable as the Bersa's with it's bobbed hammer and "forward swept" design. The kahr has the possibility of putting night sights on, if that is worth the time and money. The sights on the Bersa are very short, but is less to get snagged. Finally, practicing with .380 is more expensive than 9mm. Price of the Bersa is about $100 less.
As for the "less capable .380acp", if you do your part [shot placement], the round can still be effective. . . . . and no handgun caliber is "magical".
Thanks for you input.
The Kahr shoots 9mm [which is said to be a better defensive round than .380acp]. 7+1 capacity compared to the 8+1 of the Bersa. Both have a flat profile. The slide of the Kahr, specifically the back part, isn't nearly as concealable as the Bersa's with it's bobbed hammer and "forward swept" design. The kahr has the possibility of putting night sights on, if that is worth the time and money. The sights on the Bersa are very short, but is less to get snagged. Finally, practicing with .380 is more expensive than 9mm. Price of the Bersa is about $100 less.
As for the "less capable .380acp", if you do your part [shot placement], the round can still be effective. . . . . and no handgun caliber is "magical".
Thanks for you input.