Cop shoots, kills teen after he skips out on check at IHOP

Status
Not open for further replies.
Did they try to hit the LEO or did he step in front of the vehicle? It says both. In any case, a tragic story.
 
Please cut and paste the text of the article into your post.

Links on news sites are often short lived and in a few weeks anyone looking at the thread may not be able to bring up the original article.

Va. Teen Killed When Off-Duty Officer Fires at Approaching SUV

By Jamie Stockwell
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, February 26, 2006; Page C04

An 18-year-old was killed by police early yesterday after he and a group of friends left an Alexandria restaurant without paying, got into an SUV and then tried to hit an off-duty police officer, who fired at the vehicle, striking a passenger, police said.

Police said Aaron R. Brown of Springfield was pronounced dead at the scene, a tiny parking lot outside the International House of Pancakes in the 6200 block of Duke Street. Brown was with three friends, who were not injured in the 3:40 a.m. shooting, police said. The Alexandria officer, a part-time security guard at the restaurant, also was not hurt.

The officer, a 13-year member of the department whom police would not identify, was put on administrative leave, said Capt. John Crawford, a police spokesman.

"We have so many victims involved in this case, from the 18-year-old who was killed to his friends who were with him to the officer, who made a split-second decision he will have to live with forever. We rely on our training and hope we make the right decision every time," Crawford said outside the restaurant yesterday. "It's a tragedy every way you look at it. "

Crawford said the officer, who was in uniform, was told by a restaurant employee that the teenagers had walked out on their bill.

The officer ran out to the parking lot, a tight space shared by IHOP patrons and guests at the Comfort Inn to which the restaurant is attached, and tried to stop the youths from fleeing. He stepped into the path of the 1995 Jeep Grand Cherokee, Crawford said, and, "fearing for his safety," shot at the sport-utility vehicle.

Brown, sitting behind the driver, was struck. It was not immediately known how many shots were fired, Crawford said.

Police said the Jeep's driver, identified as 19-year-old Stephen J. Smith of Alexandria, was arrested shortly after the incident and charged with driving while intoxicated and possession of marijuana. He was released on bond yesterday afternoon, said Amy Bertsch, a police spokeswoman.

Crawford said the findings of internal investigations will be forwarded to Alexandria's chief prosecutor, S. Randolph Sengel, who will decide whether the shooting was justified. The case will also be sent to the Federal Bureau of Investigation for an independent review, Crawford said, as well as to a civilian group that reviews all police-involved incidents.

Friends Hurt, Family Haunted After Va. Teen Is Slain by Officer

By Michelle Boorstein and Steven Ginsberg
Washington Post Staff Writers
Monday, February 27, 2006; Page B01

Aaron Brown's music textbook, "The Grateful Dead: Annotated Lyrics," still lay yesterday on the living room coffee table, where the 18-year-old college student had left it. Photos of the grinning, long-haired Eagle Scout were on nearly every surface of his family's small, single-story Springfield home, with images of a shirtless Aaron on stage with his guitar, a tuxedoed Aaron at the prom, Aaron posing with his parents.

And everywhere were the regrets.

"We are devastated," Jeff Brown said last night. "We can't believe our beautiful son is dead over a stupid check."

Aaron Brown was shot about 3:40 a.m. Saturday by an off-duty Alexandria police officer in the parking lot of an International House of Pancakes on Duke Street near Landmark Mall. An IHOP employee had told the officer that Brown and three friends left the restaurant without paying.

The officer, who was in uniform and working security at the restaurant, tried to stop their 1995 Jeep Grand Cherokee and said it was threatening to hit him when he fired, according to police.

"The car was coming toward him, and he was in fear for his life," Amy Bertsch, an Alexandria police spokeswoman, said yesterday.

The driver, Stephen J. Smith, 19, of Alexandria, was later charged with driving while intoxicated and possession of marijuana.

As Brown's fellow graduates from Annandale High School railed against the unidentified officer and Smith yesterday, Jeff and Cheri Brown set a more conciliatory tone. They said they were more haunted than angry that "such a lovable soul" could be gone so quickly.

"As far as the officer feeling threatened, that's what he said he felt; we weren't there," said Jeff Brown, who has the same long, brown hair, round face and warm brown eyes as his son.

Cheri Brown said she hadn't spoken with Smith, a friend of her son's since middle school and the one at the wheel of Jeff Brown's Cherokee when the officer shot. "But I'm sure he's going through a tough time," she said.

There was a very different reaction earlier in front of the dreary, pink stucco building that houses the restaurant and a Comfort Inn. Brunch-goers passed a makeshift memorial of photos of Brown and bunches of roses flapping in the frigid wind.

"The cop is to blame. I want his badge," said Susan Rauch, 19. She attended Northern Virginia Community College with Brown, traveled to Germany with him last summer with the Annandale high school choir and had gone to the prom with him and a group of other students.

Friends Hurt, Family Haunted After Va. Teen Is Slain by Officer

"You step in front of a car, and obviously, you are going to feel in danger," she said. "That cop just ended what would have been an amazing future."

Rauch and Katie Burton, 18, another Annandale graduate, seethed as they looked at the memorial. They questioned the statement by police that the young men had left the restaurant without paying. One theory circulating yesterday among family and friends was that the four had left the money on the table instead of paying at the register.

"Aaron was one of those guys you'll never find again," Rauch said as Burton nodded. They described him as constantly cracking jokes, dancing, laughing down the school's hallways. They said he was handsome, an amazing guitarist and the kind of friend you could come to if you were having a "little breakdown."

"He was one of those guys that if you were a girl, you'd be lucky to date," Rauch said. "He had long hair, so people thought of him as a rocker, but everyone loved him: the preps, the rockers -- everyone."

Bertsch, the police spokeswoman, wouldn't go into much detail about the shooting, saying the department is conducting a criminal investigation as well as an internal one. The case will be reviewed by the FBI for possible civil rights violations, something she said is standard for deadly force or other high-profile cases.

"Obviously, the officer is under investigation, and a young man is dead," Bertsch said. "To be fair, we would never discuss eyewitness accounts."

As about 20 friends and relatives clung to one another at the Brown home last night and sobbed, his parents spoke calmly about wanting people to donate money to a charity, Guitars Not Guns, instead of giving flowers. The group gives music lessons to at-risk youngsters.

The Browns said, however, that they will pursue unanswered questions.

They said that they were not told promptly about the location of their son's body and that they believe he would have liked to donate his organs. Police also told them that four or five bullets hit the car, including one in the driver's side rear door and one on a rear quarter-panel.

"How could that happen if the vehicle was coming straight at him?" Jeff Brown asked.

They said they would await the investigation but were inclined to view the shooting as an overreaction.

"If their policy in a situation like this is to throw themselves in front of a moving vehicle and then use deadly force, maybe that policy needs to be reviewed," Jeff Brown said.

Dozens of people debated the question of responsibility on the Web site for WJLA (Channel 7), with some defending the officer and others questioning the use of force. Some said they were simply in mourning.

"A lot of it just doesn't make sense," said Colin Agnew, 20. "All I know is one of my best friends is dead."

Agnew said he and Brown became blood brothers at a scouting event last year, when they were throwing away some crab claws.

"He cut the back of his hand, and he cut my palm," Agnew said. "He grabbed my hand and slapped it down on his. It was just something really personal and an intimate moment between us. No matter what happens now, part of him is with me."

Agnew said he met Brown when they were students at North Springfield Elementary School. They were in Eagle Scouts together for a year before Brown sat next to Agnew one day on the bus and said: "Hi, my name's Aaron. What troop are you in?" Agnew recalled yesterday. "I said, 'We've been in the same troop for a year, you moron.' "

The friendship was sealed. Agnew said Brown didn't have "a bad bone in him. He wouldn't say anything bad about anybody unless it was a celebrity he didn't like. There wasn't a way you couldn't like him."

Fatal Shooting In Alexandria Fuels Debate On Police Policy

By Jamie Stockwell and Carol Morello
Washington Post Staff Writers
Tuesday, February 28, 2006; Page A01

The Alexandria police officer who fatally shot a teenage passenger in a sport-utility vehicle over the weekend was identified yesterday as Carl Stowe, a 13-year member of the force, and the shooting has reignited a debate over using deadly force on approaching cars.

Alexandria police officers are allowed to shoot at a moving vehicle if they feel their lives are in danger and no bystanders are at risk -- but only if they have exhausted all other means of defense, including moving from the vehicle's path, according to the department's use-of-force policy.

Whether Stowe, who fatally shot 18-year-old Aaron Brown as he rode in the back seat of a Jeep Cherokee, followed that policy is the subject of criminal and internal police investigations, authorities said yesterday.

"We will look at all the facts and all the witness accounts before pursuing any other charges in this case," said Amy Bertsch, a police spokeswoman, who added that Alexandria Commonwealth's Attorney S. Randolph Sengel will make the final decision about whether charges are warranted against anyone, including the officer, involved in the incident.

Stowe was working off duty, providing security at an International House of Pancakes when he fired the shots. According to police, after he was told that four teenagers had skipped out of the restaurant without paying their bill, Stowe tried to stop the SUV in which they were riding and fired on it as it allegedly bore down on him. Police would not say how many shots were fired.

"We are looking at the incident from a criminal standpoint, including what happened, whether any crimes were committed and, if so, what they were and by whom," Bertsch said. "The other investigation is internal, and that addresses the officer's actions and whether they were within policy."

In an account aired last night by WRC (Channel 4), the station quoted someone described as a passenger in the SUV as saying that as many as five shots were fired.

"As we round the corner, the cop runs in front of us and starts to fire rounds at the Jeep," the reported passenger was quoted as writing on a Web site. "Four rounds go by and [the driver] swerved to avoid the bullet and loses control of his Jeep, and the cop continues to fire his gun."

The purported witness was not identified.

Stephen J. Smith, 19, the driver of the SUV, has been charged with driving while intoxicated and possession of marijuana. He was released on $1,500 bond Saturday afternoon and is scheduled to appear Friday in Alexandria District Court.

According to court documents, Smith, 19, failed three of five field sobriety tests after the incident and registered a blood alcohol level of 0.02 more than two hours after the 3:40 a.m. shooting. Virginia law allows officers to charge anyone younger than 21 -- the state's legal drinking age -- with drunken driving if even a trace amount of alcohol is found.

Alexandria's policy on shooting at a moving vehicle is similar to most Washington area jurisdictions. But some big-city police departments, including the District's, restrict the practice because of the risk to bystanders. Many public safety experts agree that policies allowing officers to shoot at moving cars are risky and antiquated.

"We put the emphasis on better training. Striking at a moving vehicle doesn't do you any good. If you think you had a problem before, try adding a corpse behind the wheel," D.C. Police Chief Charles H. Ramsey said last night. "We feel better tactics, better approaches . . . is the way to go."

Geoffrey Alpert, a criminologist at the University of South Carolina and an expert on the use of lethal force, said officers can put themselves in a position to fear for their lives. "This is an issue that is well resolved at major departments for all the right reasons," he said. "You do not shoot at a moving vehicle when the only force being used against you is the moving vehicle."

In Boston, for example, the police department changed its policy three years ago after a woman was killed. Now officers cannot shoot at moving vehicles unless there are other threats, such as a driver having a loaded weapon. Officers are instructed to move out of the vehicle's path and find cover, to lessen the chance anyone will be injured by ricocheting bullets or a crash, officials said.

And in Los Angeles last year, police fired 10 shots into a stolen car being driven by a 13-year-old, striking him seven times. The incident prompted the city's civilian police commission to prohibit shooting at moving vehicles and directed officers to move out of the way when a vehicle is headed toward them.

More than 20 years ago, a vehicle at which New York City police were firing went into a crowd and injured several people. Since then, police departments nationwide have grown more restrictive in their policies governing deadly force.

Thomas Aveni, a part-time police officer and co-founder of the Police Policy Studies Council in Spofford, N.H., said no one keeps exact numbers on such incidents, but they are more common than many people realize.

"On some occasions, police literally step in front of a vehicle in order to facilitate an apprehension," he said. "That creates additional risk to themselves, which they in turn use as justification to pull the trigger. That troubles administrators, and it's what they're trying to rein in."

Still, "there are many occasions where police legitimately feel in fear of their own lives," Aveni said. "And the shootings are sometimes legitimate. So to limit officers' ability to use deadly force when they have legitimate need to use it against a moving vehicle is where we have a problem."

That is the chief reason most area jurisdictions have not forsaken the practice, said Dana Schrad, executive director of the Virginia Association of Chiefs of Police. "It's no different than aiming a gun at the officer," Schrad said.

"It's probably even more dangerous. The general rule of thumb is that you match force with force."

Alexandria City Council members and the mayor learned of the incident at 7 a.m. Saturday and said yesterday that they were awaiting results of the investigation into circumstances surrounding Brown's death.

"We're all concerned," said council member Rob Krupicka (D). "We want the facts to come out as quickly as possible. . . . We're going to make sure we do this thing by the book. Clearly, we need to look at this very carefully."

Staff writers Del Quentin Wilber, Ian Shapira, Allan Lengel, Martin Weil and Annie Gowen and researcher Bobbye Pratt contributed to this report.

There is nothing in this thread that is on topic in Strategies and Tactics. I will leave it open and move it to Legal and Political where discussion will be limited to the Alexandria VA. Police Department's policy for shooting at moving vehicles. Any post in this thread that even smells of cop bashing and the thread is closed and the offender gone. If you can't discuss the issue rationally, then it's best you don't post in this thread. I'd suggest that before you spout off any uninformed opinions, that you google other use of force polices, study the actual laws involved and make a reasoned case for your side. Your continued participation here depends on your ability to do that.

Jeff
 
ban these "assault flapjacks" they are the cause of crime! :cuss:

theres no reason the cop should have even allowed it to escalate to that point.
if he had enough time to draw his gun and shoot the driver, and expect the SUV NOT to keep rolling into him, or risk it going out of controll into inocents, he had more than enough time to just step aside and get the plates. its not like this kid robbed a bank.

to me in order for him to be able to say " i didnt have time to move" would mean he would of already had his weapon drawn. and why the hell is he drawing a weapon on some dine and dashers?!
 
When pancakes are outlawed, only outlaws will eat pancakes.

BTW he wasn't a "teen." He was a legal adult.
 
I'm a fan

A of the greatful dead as well, I'm sorry that this guy died
but sometimes mistakes are fatal.
Many of the deadheads I know are kinda arrogant about
lifes rules not applying to them.
Engaging in criminal behavior from DUI to skipping out without paying
or hanging out with those who do is always risky.

I'm not sure what the driver was thinking but their little joke has irretrievably
altered a lot of lives.


A lot of deadheads have zero respect for those of us who don't have money to burn and work for a living, they could have paid their tab and could have avoided the unfortunate death of their friend.

"He's gone, aint nothing gonna bring him back" greatful dead.
 
Driver in Alexandria IHOP shooting given community service

William C. Flook, The Examiner
Jun 13, 2006 5:00 AM (17 days ago)
Current rank: # 9,237 of 15,028 articles

Alexandria - The driver of an SUV involved in a deadly shooting by an off-duty Alexandria police officer outside a local restaurant was given community service and had his license suspended Monday.


Stephen J. Smith, 19, of Alexandria, was convicted of possession of marijuana and an additional alcohol-related charge stemming from the Feb. 25 incident.

Smith was part of a group accused of skipping out on a bill at an International House of Pancakes restaurant on Duke Street. Off-duty Alexandria police Officer Carl Stowe, who was working as a security guard at the IHOP, fired on the SUV, which he said was driving at him.

Springfield resident Aaron R. Brown, 18, a passenger in the vehicle, was killed.

Smith received 24 hours of community service and a six-month suspended license on the drug charge. He was also sentenced to serve 50 hours community service on the alcohol charge, according to District Court records.

» The shooting of Aaron R. Brown was the first fatal shooting involving an Alexandria police officer since April 2005, when two officers shot and killed a man who was holding his son hostage near Del Ray.

[email protected]
 
So, um, why did the cop step out in front of the car? Why didn't he just write down the license plate number?

Here's one explanation of police tactics:

http://www.sierratimes.com/archive/files/aug/23/arws082301.htm

WARNING: the above link is not "Police Friendly" It is an analysis of police tactics from someone other than an LEO. It is posted here as an effort to stimulate discussion, not to insult, indict, insinuate, or infer that ALL police officers are bad. However, the frequency of shootings that are precipitated by the officer stepping infront of a vehicle and then claiming fear for their life is enough, in my mind, to suspect that something foul is afoot.
 
Why would anyone try to stop a vehicle at close range by shooting at the driver? You could disintigrate the driver with a plasma rifle in the 40-watt range, and the vehicle still won't stop before it hits you. Just move out of the way!
 
This is a sad event on many levels

At least the LEO WAS in uniform. I agree that he should not have stepped into the path. But, it also says the driver steered (moved) toward the LEO's direction. Meaning, I think that the LEO did NOT step full-front-on with the vehicle, more likely to one side of.

It sounds like a typical youthful prank run horridly wrong. Unfortunate a passenger, not the driver paid the ultimate price. But, don't forget the price the LEO will pay. Cleared or not, don't think for one second that this man will not have some bad days of recalling, and replaying this event. That ever-present second guessing of one's self.

It seems a horridly bad day for everyone involved and related to the players herein.

Doc2005
 
Sad event all around!

I also wonder who in their right mind, especially a police officer who is trying to apprehend any suspect would step in front of a moving vehicle. I have seen this particular article before as well as another report directly from one of the witnesses who said the officer stepped right in front of the vehicle. Would any of you step directly in front of a person pointing a gun? Why step in front of a moving or even an idling vehicle. Remember more people are killed by cars each year than by guns. Common sense says don't do it. :confused:
 
Anyway you look at this, its a cluster, er, well, you know. The cop is most likely covered, but still its a mess for him, his family, and his department. It was terminally bad for the passanger, and not good for any of the persons in the car. Sometimes you just have to shake your head, and walk away. There are no right answers.
 
Jeff White said:
Please cut and paste the text of the article into your post.
_____________________________________________
Links on news sites are often short lived and in a few weeks anyone looking at the thread may not be able to bring up the original article.
Jeff, are you sure you want to make this statement, as a moderator and as a representative of THR?

Your pastes omitted something important, to wit:

© 2006 The Washington Post Company

It's one thing if THR posters take it upon themselves to violate copyright law. If the forum requests that we do so as a matter of policy, aren't you opening the forum up to being sued for copyright infringement? That's the reason most forums DON'T allow pasting entire articles into posts.
 
a right to steal

I'm sorry that a stupid stunt got the kid killed.

But he has no more right to steal from IHOP and walk away than he does to walk into you living room and raid your gun locker.

The cop was acting as an agent of the owner. It was his job to stop them. If he was run down, everyone would be singing a different song. The guy doing his job would be dead and the thief would have a happy life.

But now the cop goes home to his family and the thief is dead and everyone is crying boo hoo.
 
O.K., so let me get this straight:

A thug steals my wallet. He gets in his car. I step out in front of his car. He doesn't stop.

So I'm allowed to shoot the driver?
 
O.K., so let me get this straight:

A thug steals my wallet. He gets in his car. I step out in front of his car. He doesn't stop.

So I'm allowed to shoot the driver?
If we lived in a perfect world. Yes.

Major bummer for the cop, I hope he gets through this mess with his career and mental health intact.

No sympathy at all for the slain thief or his friends & family.
 
Stealing a meal is not a killin' offense, last I checked, and getting shot because you trusted somebody else's driving skills has got to suck.

This kid did nothing demonstrably wrong other than eat a meal with the wrong crowd. I do not believe that he deserves us dancing on his grave. Let's not.
 
I can't see any possible way this shooting could be justified. In my own mind I can not imagine how someone skipping out on a restraunt check could justify the use of deadly force. The off duty cop HAD to place HIMSELF in a position to be run over by the car and then not move when he realized it.

Yes, it sounds like the kid was a thief. I have sometimes advocated the idea that it is OK to kill thieves, especially ones inside your own house. But in this case, it seems kind of extreme.


On another note I find it sad that a police officer has to work part time as a security guard at IHOP. Especially one with that kind of time on the job. My first five years or so as a firefighter I worked part time roofing houses and shoveling gravel for landscapers. Ever been so hot you had melted ear wax run down the side of your head ? Roofing houses in Las Vegas is no picnic. Thank God those days are over for me.
 
What was the awful threat to society that this guy had to shoot to stop a restaurant scofflaw? Oh, yeah, he stepped in front of the car, and when the car didn't stop immediately, he killed a passenger, who was not even responsible for the vehicular assault.

So, how often do cops step in front of moving cars so they have a justification for shooting? If you're so threatened by a moving car, don't step in front of one.

It would be different if this was a fleeing armed robber, but a IHOP payment skipper?

No, I am not anti-LEO, don't even go there. But I don't give them a free pass, either.

K
 
I'd be willing to bet the restaurant owner is horrified that this incident happened.

Do you think this conversation would have happened?:

Owner: So, do you understand your job here? Provide security for my restaurant and customers. Make sure they are safe in the parking lot, etc. Okay?

Cop: Sure. Got it. What if somebody tries to skip out without paying?

Owner: Well, try to stop them of course.

Cop: Understood. By any means necessary?

Owner: Yes, of course. Jump in front of their car, and, if that doesn't stop 'em, shoot the bastards. I'm not in the business of giving away free pancakes.

Cop: Got it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top