Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

CURRENT Production Ruger and S&W

Discussion in 'Handguns: Revolvers' started by InkEd, Jan 23, 2011.

?

Are CURRENT Rugers as good as CURRENT S&Ws?

Poll closed Jan 30, 2011.
  1. Yes

    85 vote(s)
    76.6%
  2. No

    26 vote(s)
    23.4%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. InkEd

    InkEd Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2009
    Messages:
    2,575
    Location:
    Parts Unknown
    Do you think that the CURRENT production Ruger revolvers are as good as (or better than) the CURRENT production Smith&Wesson revolvers?
     
  2. klcmschlesinger

    klcmschlesinger Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2007
    Messages:
    301
    Location:
    Maryland
    Hard to vote for me

    I didn't vote but I really like both. I am a revolver guy and own double revolvers for both. Love them both. You will get some answers about quality over the years, and that is true, at certain times quality does fail, but today, to me, both are pretty damn good.
     
  3. chicharrones
    • Contributing Member

    chicharrones needs more ammo

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2010
    Messages:
    4,248
    Location:
    Galveston Bay is an Hour Away ©
    I was hoping for a "both" vote option as well. :D
     
  4. nofishbob

    nofishbob Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2008
    Messages:
    395
    Location:
    Copper Canyon, TX
    I think your poll is slanted towards S&W...why no option for "Ruger is better"?

    My small sample (one of each) shows Ruger quality far ahead of even S&W's Performance Center products.

    Bob
     
  5. klcmschlesinger

    klcmschlesinger Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2007
    Messages:
    301
    Location:
    Maryland
    Thanks Chich

    Thanks for the support chich. With that stance I usually get bashed bad and real quick.
     
  6. HelterSkelter

    HelterSkelter Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2011
    Messages:
    110
    ruger > smith and wesson therefore, yes ruger is as good as smith and wesson.

    that's like asking is a mercedes as good as a lexus?
     
  7. InkEd

    InkEd Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2009
    Messages:
    2,575
    Location:
    Parts Unknown
    If you answer YES than you think Ruger IS as good (or better) than S&W.

    If you answer NO than you think Ruger IS NOT as good (or better) than S&W.

    Also, We are talking ONLY about the CURRENT production revolvers.

    Hope that clears up an confusion about the voting options.
     
  8. 788Ham

    788Ham Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2010
    Messages:
    3,206
    Location:
    Hills west of Denver
    Reading a lot of the comments on the threads on here, I'm going to have to lean toward the Ruger. With S&W having some problems, fit and finish, this is my reasoning. I've had both, currently own just a Smith, but it was purchased NIB 26 years ago, never had any problems with it. I never had any problems with the Ruger either, other than my ex sold it without my knowledge, and I couldn't get it back, the Ruger, not her!:cuss: The Rugers have always been beefier on the top strap than the Smith, Smith hasn't ever corrected this, JMHO.
     
  9. CraigC
    • Contributing Member

    CraigC Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2006
    Messages:
    14,742
    Location:
    West Tennessee
    They are at least as good. S&W used to exhibit much better fit & finish but unfortunately it no longer holds true. I'll buy new Rugers all day long but the only new S&W that appeals to me is their AR. Of which I already have one.
     
  10. BlayGlock

    BlayGlock Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2009
    Messages:
    865
    Location:
    Texas
    Better trigger on both GP and LCR than on 686 and J-Frames. Similar build quality with edge going to Ruger IMO.
     
  11. dashootist

    dashootist Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2010
    Messages:
    551
    I have a hard time liking Ruger's progressive trigger pull.
     
  12. dallascj

    dallascj Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2010
    Messages:
    119
    Location:
    Dallas (Richardson) Texas
    The trigger pull on my S&W's and my Tauruses are better than my Rugers. The finish on the Rugers is also rougher than the other brands. I have lots of tool marks on both of my SP101's. Ruger is a solid dependable gun, but not as refined as my others, IMHO.
     
  13. Thaddeus Jones

    Thaddeus Jones Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2007
    Messages:
    1,008
    I voted "yes" as that was the only choice you provided that was close to the truth.

    New Rugers are actually BETTER than current production S&W's, IMO.

    With Ruger, for a reasonable, affordable price, you get a revolver without internal locks, two piece barrels or any of the other idiotic cost -cutting "innovations" from S&W.

    Ruger revolvers can be used for serious purpose. I would not consider a S&W IL revolver for ANY serious purpose. TJ
     
  14. InkEd

    InkEd Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2009
    Messages:
    2,575
    Location:
    Parts Unknown
    It clearly states "or better" in the OP.
     
  15. HGUNHNTR

    HGUNHNTR Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2006
    Messages:
    2,541
    Location:
    Georgia
    I wish we could combine "old style" triggers and craftsmanship with modern metallurgy, regardless of brand.
    I just purchased a couple older Smith revolvers, the differences are remarkable.
     
  16. ADKWOODSMAN

    ADKWOODSMAN Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2006
    Messages:
    1,066
    Location:
    Adirondacks of NYS
    Having purchased from both, a Mod 57 4" .41 Mag from Smith and a pair of Vaquero Bisleys .357 from Ruger, they seem as good as any of my older read 60's guns.
     
  17. roaddog28

    roaddog28 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2009
    Messages:
    632
    Location:
    Escondido, CA
    Today a new Ruger is a better value than a new Smith in my opinion. For example. A new Ruger GP100 4 inch stainless steel can be bought in California for around $559. A new S&W 686P 4 inch goes for $759. The difference is $200. Compare the revolvers side by side and most people would agree there is not $200 worth of difference. The triggers on both revolvers are good. At one time Smith had the better trigger. Not anymore. Some people will say the finish is better on the Smith but I don't see that much difference. I guess paying more for a internal lock hole on the side of the revolver is worth extra money but I don't. So, for $200 more a person gets one extra round and a internal lock. No thanks for me. I would buy the GP100 everytime.
    Howard
     
  18. ArchAngelCD

    ArchAngelCD Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2006
    Messages:
    22,118
    Location:
    Northeast PA, USA
    Ummm, just a note, Rugers also have internal locks. BUT, they were smart enough to hide them!
     
  19. Waywatcher

    Waywatcher Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2006
    Messages:
    1,563
    Location:
    WI
    Some do, some don't.

    GP100s, & SP101s do not have any ILS.

    New Vaqueros, LCR, & LCR .357 do have ILS.

    Other models I'm not sure of, but I think most of the 'older' products do not, like the _____hawk revolvers SA and DA.
     
  20. Thaddeus Jones

    Thaddeus Jones Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2007
    Messages:
    1,008
    The brand new GP100 and brand new SP101 I examined this past Saturday did not have any internal locks - hidden or otherwise. TJ
     
  21. Guillermo

    Guillermo member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2008
    Messages:
    6,346
    Location:
    Austin, Texas
    I thought Ruger hid them under the grips?

    You have to drill the grips to use them.

    Can anyone clarify?
     
  22. MCgunner

    MCgunner Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2005
    Messages:
    25,070
    Location:
    The end of the road between Sodom and Gomorrah Tex
    Actually, IMHO, Rugers are far and away BETTER than new production Smiths. But, I am definitely NOT a Smith and Wesson fan boy.
     
  23. Guillermo

    Guillermo member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2008
    Messages:
    6,346
    Location:
    Austin, Texas
    HA!!!

    when has your opinion ever been humble?


    :neener:
     
  24. MCgunner

    MCgunner Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2005
    Messages:
    25,070
    Location:
    The end of the road between Sodom and Gomorrah Tex
    It's my new years resolution, to be humble. :D But, I never keep those resolutions very long.
     
  25. Guillermo

    Guillermo member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2008
    Messages:
    6,346
    Location:
    Austin, Texas
    it has been almost a month (tapping foot)
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page