schmeky
Member
I completed a concealed handgun course today. The instructor was a retired State Police officer. He was a strong proponent of the 1911, BUT ONLY in the hands of an experienced shooter. I completely agreed.
He was also an advocate of the Sig line of autos. He let me examine his Sig 228, and put a couple of magazines through it at a B-27 target.
On the other hand, I have a CZ 75. I was expecting a HUGE difference between the Sig and CZ. Don't get me wrong, the out of the box Sig was really sweet, BUT, the DA pull was not significantly better than my CZ, however, the SA pull was a little better on the Sig.
Acccuracy wise, I couldn't detect a significant difference offhand shooting. What I did notice is the CZ is more ergonomic in the grip area. In addition to being a big 1911 fan, I love the dual capability of the CZ, i.e., DA or condition 1, as opposed to the DA/SA/Decock Sig.
Lastly, I had to consider this: is the Sig worth $700+ to the CZ's sub-$400.00 price?
He was also an advocate of the Sig line of autos. He let me examine his Sig 228, and put a couple of magazines through it at a B-27 target.
On the other hand, I have a CZ 75. I was expecting a HUGE difference between the Sig and CZ. Don't get me wrong, the out of the box Sig was really sweet, BUT, the DA pull was not significantly better than my CZ, however, the SA pull was a little better on the Sig.
Acccuracy wise, I couldn't detect a significant difference offhand shooting. What I did notice is the CZ is more ergonomic in the grip area. In addition to being a big 1911 fan, I love the dual capability of the CZ, i.e., DA or condition 1, as opposed to the DA/SA/Decock Sig.
Lastly, I had to consider this: is the Sig worth $700+ to the CZ's sub-$400.00 price?