The link didn't work for me, but I've seen his .45 cal bullet. I don't like how large the lube groove is, how small the meplat is, or how long it is for it's weight.
Part of this for me is to put on a good bit of weight, but keep it short, not much more than a ball so that it doesn't take up powder capacity.
Most of the various bullets I've used have rather shallow and narrow lube grooves and it seems plenty. I've only used them through my ROA though, and nothing has been able to slow it down. Maybe my '58 will be another story as I know the base pin is more finicky.
I sorta want to scale this bullet down to .380".
http://accuratemolds.com/bullet_detail.php?bullet=45-160B-D.png
And so I can have him squish 85-100 grns into a wide flat nose giving it a shorter OAL than a ball, or I can have him design it so that it is the same length as a ball giving it a weight somewhere north of 100 grns.
Here is his .36 cal bullet:
http://accuratemolds.com/bullet_detail.php?bullet=38-095B-D.png
If this weighs 95 grns in WW lead it ought to be close to 100 grns in pure. Now widen the meplat, bring the nose in directly off of the top driving band, lengthen the driving bands, increase the base diameter to .369" or so, and reduce the lube groove slightly and it easily gains another 15-25 grns or so.
So with a very limited powder capacity would you choose to have a heavier bullet with a similar charge, or would you reduce the OAL to increase the capacity? Maybe a compromise between the two and bring the OAL to .365" or something?
I need to look around at old threads to see if I can find the chambers diameter as well as the bore size.