• You are using the old Black Responsive theme. We have installed a new dark theme for you, called UI.X. This will work better with the new upgrade of our software. You can select it at the bottom of any page.

Do I really need any other caliber than 9mm?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well.....now that I thought about it....:uhoh:

Fred Bear killed a African Bull elephant with a Recurve Bow at 25 feet!

But thats not important right now....

we have a guy that wants another handgun, and I think he should get one because, well because!

More interesting facts: Well just because! And just a note on SIG 357 Ballistics..I was just posting information, not really paying attention to the expansion. (but .600 is good)

However, this may be why I never bought a SIG 357. I have always loved the 9mm caliber and found some ballistics

Winchester standard 9mm +p JHP 115gr 455ft/lb energy @ 1335fps muzzle
(this is comparing 115 gr to 150 gr Sig 357)

I also seen these listed as well, and while it is a smaller weight bullet I like the energy it produces! I actually think this would be advantage on the such as OP is considering defense against? ....anybody shot any of these?

RBCD Ammunition:
9mm TFSP 60gr 539ft/lb energy 2010 muzzle
 
^
We kinda know this.
Didn't read your link but I heard yesterday on national news that there's a "mountain man" down in south Utah threatening and burglarizing people for the last 4-5 years. They recently found his newest hide.
 
I am going to get a 9 mm in a small gun for Concealed Carry. That is the only place I would consider 9 mm. I have read the Medical Examiner reports about how many 9 mm shots it takes to equal one .40 or .45 cal shot on a human Bad Guy. I use only .40 FS for Home Defense. I can't shoot a small .40.

In bear country I would carry either a Ruger .357 Magnum revolver or a .41 magnum revolver, either with a 6.5 inch barrel. I know I can shoot a 357 and expect I could shoot a .41 but know I cannot shoot a .44.
 
Last edited:
There was a very widespread 'report' from a guy who claimed to be a medical examiner, it's been brutally debunked at this point. The guy was claiming to be doing something like six autopsies every day, 365 days a year. That's absurd.

And there's no formula to figure out how many 9mm bullets equal a .40 or .45, they are all nearly identical in performance.
 
.45 isn't going to give anyone an appreciable upgrade in power when it comes to wild animals. 9mm and .45 are best suited for anti-personnel purposes.

That said I feel comfortable with 9mm as a back up gun for 2 and 4 legged critters, as long as it is loaded with hot expanding ammo (of either 124 or 147 +P variety).

If you really want a bear blaster you have to start with .357. If you aren't going to hunt with this handgun, I think you'd be well served with 9mm though.
 
Lions and tigers and bears...

Mountain lions and bears... I'd take the biggest thing I'm comfortable with. They don't just stand there and let you shoot them. If you got one or two shots, you'd be lucky. You'd likely never see the ML if he was on the hunt. Any time I'm in the woods, doing whatever... I'm packing my .357, with a real stout load. Its about as big a gun as I'd want to tote around for weight reasons, that would still give you a fighting chance.

I was elk hunting once. Shot a 4X4 at about 15 ft. and my rifle jammed. If I'd not have shot him thru the heart I wouldn't be typing this, since I'd left my sidearm in camp. It was the only time I'd ever done that and I knew better. You can't pick the circumstances, you have to always plan for the worst.

A suggestion from a site devoted to hiking in ML country:

FIGHT BACK: In the unlikely event of an actual attack, use whatever you can—fists, rocks, sticks, backpack—to fend off the mountain lion. Try to remain standing and get up if you’re knocked down.

I can just visualize that scenario... eeeekk! My Lab can kick my butt, I can imagine taking on a cougar hand to hand.

Google a hiker who has ever been stalked by a mountain lion or a bear for that matter. Its a very unnerving experience. Then choose your caliber. (A Barrett isn't an option...) :)

You are however, a thousand times more likely to get killed by lighning than a mountain lion... 14 fatal attacks during the past 100 years and 15,000 people were killed by lightning in that same period.
 
Last edited:
When going up against dangerous game I want the most protection I can carry. Against mountain lion... 9mm MIGHT be enough. Against black bear... I wouldn't trust 9mm. I prefer as much overkill as I can carry for SD. For defense against black bears I'd opt for a .454 Casull.
 
Chances are you'll probably never see it coming, so this debate is a bit superfluous.

elk-hunter-mountain-lion.jpg
 
.45 isn't going to give anyone an appreciable upgrade in power when it comes to wild animals. 9mm and .45 are best suited for anti-personnel purposes.

Last Saturday I spent several hours in a long BS session with two game wardens (friends of mine). Both were packing .45 ACP sidearms, one a Les Baer, the other a SIG 220. One of the wardens is a regional firearms trainer. I brought up the current thought about wound channels, the 9mm vs. .45 debate and so forth. We all agreed there is a preponderance of information that indicates there is no appreciable difference between 9mm, .40, and .45 given proper bullet selection. I even asked point blank why law enforcement agencies in the west aren't going to 9mm by the droves, if for no other reason than to take advantage of training with a caliber that is more manageable.

Then came the obligatory "yeah but" follow up to the studies on ballistic media. Te firearms trainer told me he had shot well over 150 big game animals (mostly deer and antelope) with his .45 Les Baer, another 100+ with a department issue .40, and at least another 100 with his 9mm. That's 350 animals, and a conservative estimate at that. He told me his subjective observation is the .45 does the best job of dispatching critters with the 9mm coming in dead last. The other warden has also killed over 300 big game animals with a handgun and he agreed wholeheartedly. I guess they are going with their own boots on the ground experience.

We spoke for quit a time and I asked them if they had ever put a layer of long underwear, a wool shirt, and a heavy Carhartt coat over a ballistics torso. They answered yes, their agency had done testing with the type of heavy outdoor clothing encountered during winter time activities. When I asked about the results all I got was, "You don't see us using 9's do you?"

I have come to the conclusion all of this chatter makes for interesting internet debate, but in the end just get a sidearm you are comfortable with, proficient with, and that you trust.
 
9mm is a good, but it's also fun to try other calibers and platforms. That said, for most things a person would probably do fine with only a 9mm.
 
I wonder if they were mostly shooting already downed animals to euthanize them?
 
Bunch of 9mm haters on this forum, truth be told you cannot call the 9mm a whimp if you think the 357 is a real manstopper (yall been watching too many movies). Let me clear this up the 357 cal is a 9mm projectile so there is no real difference in the reguard to caliber, secondly the energy of +P 9mm loads rival the avarage 357 loads and excede the performance of the more mild 357 loads. To be fair lets compare the 9mm +P gold saber to the 357 mag gold saber.
9mm 124gr bullet 1180fps
357 magnum 125gr 1220fps
To imply that anyone or anything would notice the difference between the two is just plain silly, much less a night and day difference. Now granted there are more powerful loads for the 357 but there are much more powerful loads for the 9mm also.
The 9mm has been and will remain a highly effective weapon for both two and four legged predators. Many of the hog hunters around here carry 9mms they just outpenatrate the 45s.....go figure.
 
I use Buffalo Bore 180 gr. in a Taurus 66 6.5". There are no 9's, 40's or 45's that get close to the energy that produces. I've seen deer hit in the kill zone with a 30-06 and run 400 yards. Bear hit with the same run 1/2 a mile. The only reason i don't take a bigger hand gun in the woods is because i don't have a bigger hand gun. But I agree that 9mm is, in nearly all cases, enough for self defense in the urban jungle. You get a lot of chances with a 9. Your not going to get a lot of chances with a bear!
 
Deer hit through the boiler room with an 06 and still ran 400yds!? Bet they were not using ballistic tips :D None of mine have made it more then 20 feet, BTs at 3000fps turn their whole chest cavity into a bloody soup. While a 9mm nor 45 ACP is not an ideal bear stopper, both will penatrate deep enough and can be fired fast enough to make them effective in the right hands. I carry 19+1 and am an exellent shot with a handgun, I fear no hog/cat/bear that I can see. BTW they make a 147gr JFP 9mm that will penatrate 40" of soft tissue, yeah that is 416 Rigby level penatration!! It is designed just for large dangerous anamals.
The 9mm is the 30-06 of the pistol world, it won't set the world on fire with it's uber power/speed/momentum but it can be loaded to do darn near anything with a reasonable sized/weight/recoil package.
 
Last edited:
Who was that one Scot that got drunk and repeatedly strangled many a leopard?
Didn't come back once upon a time.

A Scotsman that drank? How many could there be? LOL!!
 
Bunch of 9mm haters on this forum, truth be told you cannot call the 9mm a whimp if you think the 357 is a real manstopper (yall been watching too many movies). Let me clear this up the 357 cal is a 9mm projectile so there is no real difference in the reguard to caliber, secondly the energy of +P 9mm loads rival the avarage 357 loads and excede the performance of the more mild 357 loads. To be fair lets compare the 9mm +P gold saber to the 357 mag gold saber.
9mm 124gr bullet 1180fps
357 magnum 125gr 1220fps
To imply that anyone or anything would notice the difference between the two is just plain silly, much less a night and day difference. Now granted there are more powerful loads for the 357 but there are much more powerful loads for the 9mm also.
The 9mm has been and will remain a highly effective weapon for both two and four legged predators. Many of the hog hunters around here carry 9mms they just outpenatrate the 45s.....go figure.
Since we're talking trail, why don't you compare 9mm124/147gr XTPs to 357mag 125/140/158/180gr XTPs, or the 357mag 180gr WFNGC, Swift A-frame and Nosler Partitions?

Why is everyone thinking they'll be getting a clear shot on whatever kind of threat on the trail or at a campsite? I know of two people who have had their dogs tangle with black bears, both were carrying JHP ammunition, the first in 41mag and the second in 357mag. In both incidents, all 6, less than optimum target acquisition, shots were needed to save their dogs, #1 bruin weighed about 250#s and the second about 150#s.

I live in dense mountain lion habitat and I don't know anyone who carries a 9mm for defensive mountain lion protection. 357/44mags are very popular and I've carried both, a M29 Mountain when there are bears in the area, but mostly 38Super loaded with 125gr XTP @1491fps, a 357mag bullet at factory 357mag velocities. I prefer the 140gr XTP/1500fps in 357mag as a minimum this time of year, but I can't match the Super/1911 split times with the 686. I'm also the only local I know of who carries the 10mm, 200gr WFNGC.

I like to shoot and this is a great time of year to pop a few caps, over 2100 rounds past 3 weeks, and work on those tan lines. :)

I can go outback a thousand times and nothing happens, other times the Super has been used in defense, typically feral dog packs and typically charging pit bulls. The Super provides those lightning stops Mas Ayoob refers to when writing about the 357SIG. In reading over a number of DEA incident reports, including assisting local LEAs with paper service, I was surprised at the number of attacking pit bulls that survived after being shot with the 40 S&W during door entry. Are we to believe the 9mm would perform better? What about a mountain lion that's facing you at 40 yards and isn't retreating?

Every morning I take the dog (95# West German - German Shepherd) out to exercise and get a few wind sprints in. Monday morning we went from play to work in the wink of an eye. A coyote was following a game trail right to left and then stopped upon seeing us. Coyotes and dawgs are extremely unpredictable when they meet. Dawg was off leash and I had given him the down command, when I drew the Colt Super, I noticed through peripheral vision that he sat up and keyed on me. To my surprise, the coyote faced us and advanced. I brought the Colt up, it's front post was wider than the coyote so I squared up the sights between the coyote's ears and fired. I had guesstimated 90 yards and it turned out to be 95 yards,the XTP shooting flat and taking out a piece of the coyote's shoulder. It still ran after being hit.

The dawg and I have shared thousands and thousands of rounds together and he would have attacked had he been given the command. We walked to the hit sight and he picked up another scent and started walking toward a dense mesquite area on the property. I called him back and took him home because there are areas I don't take him.

As much as I like the Super, the XTPs are not suited for thick mesquite, enter the G20 SF with 200gr WFNs and upon entering the dense mesquite area I find the very fresh footprints of a large bobcat/lynx, measuring 3.25" across. Good definition between the pads and the loose sand hadn't had time to mute. A couple hundred yards away and I came across very fresh bobcat scat in a large dog print. In another dense mesquite area I saw prints showing where a large dog had been broadsided by a bobcat or small mountain lion a couple of days earlier.

To bring this to a conclusion, dogs, whoever they belong to are magnets for cats, bears, hogs, javelina and whatever other predators may be on/near the trail. The 10mm/200gr WFNGC is sufficient for what the OP may encounter in the NW, otherwise get a mountain gun in either 41/44mag and load it with a high sectional density WFN. A heavy weight bullet penetrates deep and it can be loaded for recoil rather than top end velocity. For that matter, same can be said for the 44 Special or Buffalo Bore's 255gr WFN in 45auto if it feeds reliability.

Brush alongside trails also makes the case for heavy WFNs, nature has a way of obscuring a lot of things to the untrained eye. :)
 
I like the 9 mm, and I shoot it alot. What I have noticed over time is the 9 mm guys (me included) will constantly be searching for the 'ideal' load, and always changing to the newest hot loading. To me, this is an indicator that they are not 100% comfortable with their choice.

I don't notice the 10 mm, .41 Mag, .44 Mag or .45 ACP guys doing this nearly as much. Now, this is just a general observation. I know that I give much less thought as to what I carry in the other calibers than I do in the 9 mm.

I believe the fundamental issue is the 9 mm can be nearly as potent as a typical .357 out of a shorter barrel, but only in the lighter loadings. Even out of a 3" barrel, the .357 outclasses the 9 mm with heavier bullets. Most folks would chose a 147/158 grain projectile for 'outdoors' use. The 9 mm loses that battle to the .357.

By the way, as much as I like the .357 golden saber round, you chose one of the hottest 9 mm loadings and compared it to one of the weakest .357 loadings. Heck, I carry the golden saber loading out of a 3" Smith BECAUSE is a mid-range load.
 
I wonder if they were mostly shooting already downed animals to euthanize them?
Mostly crippled animals hit by cars that are still in the right of way posing a threat. That and cripples during hunting season. You know, busted legs, jaws shot off, etc. FWIW, neither of my game warden friends are 9mm haters, they just have a personal preference.

To imply that anyone or anything would notice the difference between the two is just plain silly...
Could be, but I have too much respect for my two friends and their experiences after shooting many hundreds of animals to characterize their choice as silly. For that matter, I would imagine their agency as a whole has shot many thousands of animals through the years and I don't think they are silly for not going back to a nine.

Yesterday I had the caliber debate conversation with a friend of mine who was a Navy Seal for many years, doing several tours in the sandbox. I know he likes shooting a 9mm and he owns a G19 and a couple of Sigs. I asked him what he carries and he told me a .45 in a 1911. He told me he would, " Hate to be shot with a 9mm, but he prefers to shoot people with a .45." Is that silly? Maybe, maybe not. He also told me it is just a waste of time to discuss the topic on the internet. Of that I know he is right. I know he is not alone in his line of thought about calibers when one considers how many special forces operators use a .45. Of course that's 9mm ball compared to .45 ball. I know a lot of those guys return from the sandbox and purchase 1911s in .45 for their own use. I don't think that makes them "haters" or "silly".
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top