artherd
member
In the days of modern, uncorrosive ammunition, do we overclean our rifles and handguns?
Other than gumming up to the point of causing a reliability problem, what is the point in keeping a modern firearm in 'squeaky clean' condition?
Is the carbon/stuff produced by burning smokleless powder an abrasive? How hard is it? what's it's Rockwell rating? Will it errode precision machined surfaces of treated aluminum or steel? (or will it just make a twinge of friction and otherwise subjugate much like graphite or any softer material?)
How about cleaning the chamber and barrel of a gun, does doing so every 100 rounds actually cause MORE wear than not on your average .30-06 rifle?
Back in the day of corrosive combustion byproducts being the norm, I can easially see why the Cleaning Imperative was strong in our minds. But are we hanging onto a practice 40 years out of date?
Other than gumming up to the point of causing a reliability problem, what is the point in keeping a modern firearm in 'squeaky clean' condition?
Is the carbon/stuff produced by burning smokleless powder an abrasive? How hard is it? what's it's Rockwell rating? Will it errode precision machined surfaces of treated aluminum or steel? (or will it just make a twinge of friction and otherwise subjugate much like graphite or any softer material?)
How about cleaning the chamber and barrel of a gun, does doing so every 100 rounds actually cause MORE wear than not on your average .30-06 rifle?
Back in the day of corrosive combustion byproducts being the norm, I can easially see why the Cleaning Imperative was strong in our minds. But are we hanging onto a practice 40 years out of date?