GroovedG19
Member
The more adversaries you have, then the more higher capacity of shots the better.
You can fire hammers into each almost as fast as you can shoot singles, then finish with shots to the brainbox after you've fired the last hammer.
You can fire hammers into each
Hammers? I think I've heard the term before but what do you mean? Double-taps?
A handgun in general makes me uncomfortable in a defensive situation. Even a $3000 custom 1911 is not as superior a fighting tool as a $200 Mossberg 12ga or a $300 Romanian AK clone loaded with cheap ball although the handgun can be there when the long gun can't.
#1 - Find some cover.
In *ANY* situation where you might have to bust caps, you TAKE COVER FIRST - this ensures that if the goblins have a piece, you chances of eating some lead are reduced drastically.
(You *hearing* me, Revdisk?!)
#2 - Plot your bailout route.
Make sure you know which direction, and how you plan to "tactically disengage" aka run AWAY like you have some sense, once you have forestalled immediate pursuit.
And you were driving what? A four wheeled licensed, registered, insured, lethal device that is capable of injuring and/or kills how many people each year?It just made me wish I was carrying something with higher capacity.
Hate to break it to you guys, but if you are attacked by six men, already at close range, then it doesn't matter if you have 8 or 15 or 30, because you aren't going to be alive long enough to use them all anyway.
Better to have and not need, then to need and not have.
hence ending the argument with the one, uncontested prrof that 9mm is better than .45
Archangel said:Sorry. You could just as easily say it's better to have a .45 and not need it, then need a .45 and not have it.
Let the argument rage on.