I challenge anyone to put up measurements of the effectiveness of a given compensator on a .45 pistol.
Good thing you didn't say youl'd bet money on it !!! LOL
In the mid-1980s , Gunsmith/Top Competitor Bill Wilson and John Shaw were the first people to start useing "compensators" in IPSC and Bowling Pin matches.
In the USPSA monthly pub. ---- there has been more then one test to compare the effects of brl. weights/ports/comps ---- one I remember , was a test where they used a Ransom Rest to hold the gun and mounted a pen on it to record the amt. of muzzle rise.
Another very early test was to put [ X ] amount of tape over the comp/ports --- if it blew off four wraps of tape , it was a better comp then one that only blew off two etc.
Here is a photo of my old Jim Clark Sr. built Pin-Master;
This is a Gen II ---- better then the Gen.1 at reduceing recoil and muzzle rise.
I used 200 gr. handloads in IPSC and the Power Factor was 175 at the time --- for 2nd Chance Bowling Pin matches , I used 185gr. JHPs at about 1000fps to knock the pins off the table.
If you used 230gr. bullets , you would see more amount of of muzzle rise then the 185/155 gr. at higher fps ----- the more gas you have , the better the ports/comps work.
The early comps worked so well , they made the Match Directors start a seperate class for them and that is why , still to this day, we have a Open/Unlimited class and a Stock or Production class.
BTW --- EVERYONE that has shot my Pin-Master after shooting the same ammo in my stock Gold Cup said there was less muzzle rise and the recoil felt "softer" to them.
A well designed "Comp" is NOT a gimmick ---- look at modern battle rifles , tanks , etc. -- they ALL have some kind of "comp" on them.