Does having a CCW automatically waive your right to consent for a search

[j4justice]

In Texas under the castle doctrine, in a vehicle, does the handgun have to be completly hidden?

 

[SHvar]

If they want to search your vehicle, they order you to remove the dog or call animal control to remove the dog. If the dog is an immediate threat from outside the vehicle (with no other choice) they can shoot the dog.
Just as in the situation of a K9 searching an area or property, and another dog approaches which is not leashed under its owners control, they can shoot the dog because its a danger to the K9.

 

[SHvar]

"If you don't value your Constitutional rights, there's no reason to protect them."
This is a far stretch from what was siad, oh I get it, paranoid.

"You can consent to vehicle searches, home searches or daily cavity searches if you like. Advising OTHERS to deprecate and devalue their hard won rights is every bit as wrong as advising others to share needles or have unprotected sex with strangers."

By the way as a combat vet I understand more than most who spout off comments about "hard won rights".
As far as the rest of the comments in that responce, they have nothing to do with a LAW ABIDING citizen allowing an officer of the law to take a look in their car. But its your choice. At least comment with relevence.


"That's the typical line espoused by those who wish to erect a tyranny."
Translation, paranoid, ignorance.

"If you won't stand up for your rights, then you deserve none. "

Ive stood up for my rights, and yours, your very welcome by the way.

"Bend over and take it if you wish, but do not advise others to do so."
Again, not relevent.


"Lets say the car is used and they find something hidden(could happen)."

Lets say the car is used, lets say you havent bothered to take a look in the car you bought used for the past 2 years, Im sorry but I dont know too many people that wouldnt find anything hidden in their newly bought used car in the first few days at most.
I do know someone who bought an auctioned car that was searched an impounded and stored for a long time in police custody. A short time after they bought it, they found the drugs that the cops didnt find, and called them to remove the evidence that added another conviction to its former owner.

Im sorry, but what if aliens were controlling our president with "tele_pathetic" powers.

 

[Wheeler44]

Ive stood up for my rights, and yours, your very welcome by the way.

This not an attack; Then why do you counsel to revoke them, (even if temporarily)? Your rights that you fought for are yours to do what you see fit with... Mine.... not so much...

Im sorry but I dont know too many people that wouldnt find anything hidden in their newly bought used car in the first few days at most.

But it is inconceivable that you know everyone in your town, let alone all of us. And that is but a small sampling of the population..So what and whom you know is irrelevant to the discussion as put forth by the OP.....

I do know that at least two LEO's have misquoted or misinterpreted the law ( that they are paid to enforce) in this thread alone....

A rookie roofer can offer you advice... If that advice is not in accordance with the laws of nature as you understand them, you are free to disregard the advice....or suffer a leak.

If a rookie LEO performs in a way that is not in accordance with the law of the land.....You may well lose more than a little sheet rock... but the remedy is the same...You or your heirs may potentially receive monetary compensation...And the LEO in question is free then to take up a career in roofing..

 

[bdickens]

"If you don't value your Constitutional rights, there's no reason to protect them."
This is a far stretch from what was siad, oh I get it, paranoid.

"You can consent to vehicle searches, home searches or daily cavity searches if you like. Advising OTHERS to deprecate and devalue their hard won rights is every bit as wrong as advising others to share needles or have unprotected sex with strangers."

By the way as a combat vet I understand more than most who spout off comments about "hard won rights".
As far as the rest of the comments in that responce, they have nothing to do with a LAW ABIDING citizen allowing an officer of the law to take a look in their car. But its your choice. At least comment with relevence.


"That's the typical line espoused by those who wish to erect a tyranny."
Translation, paranoid, ignorance.

"If you won't stand up for your rights, then you deserve none. "

Ive stood up for my rights, and yours, your very welcome by the way.

"Bend over and take it if you wish, but do not advise others to do so."
Again, not relevent.


"Lets say the car is used and they find something hidden(could happen)."

Lets say the car is used, lets say you havent bothered to take a look in the car you bought used for the past 2 years, Im sorry but I dont know too many people that wouldnt find anything hidden in their newly bought used car in the first few days at most.
I do know someone who bought an auctioned car that was searched an impounded and stored for a long time in police custody. A short time after they bought it, they found the drugs that the cops didnt find, and called them to remove the evidence that added another conviction to its former owner.

Im sorry, but what if aliens were controlling our president with "tele_pathetic" powers.

Whatever.

 

[Deanimator]

"If you don't value your Constitutional rights, there's no reason to protect them."
This is a far stretch from what was siad, oh I get it, paranoid.

It's 100% dead on. You sound remarkably like the anti-gunners who say that anyone who carries a firearm for self-defense is "paranoid".

The law and the constitution are there for a reason. Your disdain for them doesn't negate that reason.

EVERYBODY has to obey the law, including LEOs. I can't think of a single GOOD reason to absolve anyone from doing so. I can think of a LOT of BAD ones.

 

[Art Eatman]

Gone circular. Enough...