Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by Kaybee, Mar 14, 2018.
Well, that’s interesting because every FFL I have gone go explains what it is the proceeds to tell them a make and number after explaining if it’s a pistol or long gun. Maybe it’s just the ones I’ve been to but on multiple occasions they have done this. Think about it this way, if there isn’t info associated with it then what’s the point in filling out the 4473 to begin with? Either way, they know more than you think. The gun can be tracked to a point. Don’t believe me, ask someone in the atf or law enforcement. How exactly do they come up with that info if nothing is kept?
You also kind of contradicted yourself in the same statement. You just said that the 4473 doesn’t have specific info, which you are correct, but then you turn around and say in the same breath that by the atf’s Own admission that it can only be tracked to the original buyer. Well, if nothing is kept as far as records, whether 4473 or not, then how do they know who the first buyer was?
Here is how guns are tracked by ATF: They go first to the manufacturer/importer, who leads them to the distributor, who leads them to the selling FFL, who then produces the 4473. As such, it constitutes "registration" to the first buyer.
As of right now, when you sell to a private party (in a free state) the chain is broken. UBC would require tracking all the way down the chain, thus it requires registration in order to be enforceable.
Again, you cannot legislate evil out of existence. You cannot at this point, make guns disappear. All anything more than the current system will do is disable honest law abiding people from being able to arm and protect themselves. The criminals will still have them and the illegal gun making market will be booming. So, again I say, what is the point in us giving up anymore rights or adding anything extra to these ridiculous laws already on the books? We DO NOT give up anything else. Period. Assuming they confiscated them all from law abiding people and some idiot with an illegal gun does something crazy horrendous to garner the attention of the media. What are they going to do/ban then? At that point we will have given up our rights for absolutely nothing. I don’t see why it’s so hard for people to grasp this.
What?? If the buyer is issued a code number there will have to be a name associated with it. A code number with no name as to whom it was given is useless and proves nothing. A buyer could give me a code obtained from a friend or family member who had purchased a gun and received a code. How would I know?
That involves FFL dealers. According to the rules FFL's have to follow, the dealer would have to log the gun into his inventory (enter it into his "bound book") and have the buyer fill out a Form 4473, wherein the gun is described. That exactly is the "backdoor registration" that we're trying to avoid.
Now, if you're proposing a carve-out special procedure in which the dealer doesn't enter the gun into his "bound book," then this doesn't have any advantage over allowing the individuals to have direct access to the NICS portal on their own. (Most dealers would be highly skeptical of doing it that way.)
Anyway, involving a dealer means that the dealer will charge a fee for his services.That fee is likely to be many times more than the nominal fee for the online NICS access.
Quisling = traitor. Vidkun Quisling was the collaborator who led the puppet government of Norway under German occupation in WW2.
I've said that there are two conditions: (a) that the political winds have shifted against us, so that we are likely to lose, and (b) that we can get something substantially positive out of the deal. If either of these things isn't true, then it's pointless to talk to the other side.
In other words, we have to continually assess the landscape surrounding gun politics, and at the same time prepare the proposals that we are willing to put on the table, when the time is right. What I see now on the part of the pro-gun side is reactivity, not proactivity. In the long run you can never win if your only tactic is defensive.
Simple. The current Form 4473 (and the NICS check that goes with it) applies to purchases from FFL licensed dealers. Universal Background Checks would extend this system to all transfers of guns between unlicensed individuals. Most UBC proposals would have the individuals go through dealers to finalize their transactions (thereby leaving a paper trail that might be de facto registration). What we are discussing here are alternatives to FFL dealer involvement.
No, that's not what I'm saying. I want to see substantial rollback of gun restrictions (particularly those involving the NFA) and I think a non-registration UBC system might be a way to get these rollbacks. They (the antigunners) trade something that they want for something that we want. Or, if they don't deal, they are the ones who would carry the onus of being obstructionists.
I think I explained most of this, in my original suggestion in this thread. Anyway, I'll recap. We have an existing NICS database. A prospective gun buyer would go to an online NICS portal, enter his driver's license information, and, if approved, would be given a unique approval number. (He would charge the dollar or two fee for this service on his credit card.) This approval number would be good for one transaction, and would expire after a couple of days. The buyer would give this approval number, and his driver's license, to the seller, who would verify his identity and then go to the NICS portal, which would confirm that the approval number had been issued to that person. The sale could then proceed. No record would be made of the gun. In fact, there would be nothing to indicate that the sale had even been completed. (The seller's call to the NICS portal would void that approval number for further use.)
Using such a system would require no more technical knowledge than it takes to post here.
So my mother wouldn’t do it without assistance, my father in law either, none of my remaining grandparents, my dad MIGHT.... more likely he’d just say that’s a stupid law and not comply.
Can I do it from my phone/iPad, because I don’t have a computer anymore.. is so what if my phone gets stolen? Will they have access to all that information if they’ve looked over my shoulder and saw my passcode?
See the problem?
The debate over gun control reveals a fundamental difference between the conservative and the progressive temperament. The former realizes that the capacity for evil exists within every person, and that it always will. The latter believes that evil is something that can be eliminated by government coercion. Thus the advocacy for limitless federal power that is neither possible nor desirable.
Hoping the "crocodile will eat me last" is a poor survival plan, and a worse code for living.
Immediate impulses to stave off pain or danger are often less important than the long-term consequences of running from the fray. Neither history nor experience suggests that mollifying aggressors is helpful.
All legitimate issues, but easily resolved.
Maybe, but the amount of people that simply wouldn’t do because they don’t know how would be in the millions.
Many millions more would REFUSE to do it because they knew to a certainty that it's a sham and a trap.
Enemies of the 2nd Amendment are usually enemies of the 1st as well.
And many are just useful idiots being lead by others.
In terms of a FFL based UBC system, of course this is just a step toward requiring a registry. How can one prove a gun was transferred illegally unless they knew who possessed it at the time the law was passed? Otherwise everyone could just lie and say “I bought/sold it before the law took effect.”
Did the GCA '68 stop the criminal use of firearms?
Did NICS stop criminal use of firearms?
Will UBC stop the criminal use of firearms?
No, No, No, and No.
Be free men, refuse to have your rights infringed, and just say NO!
Separate names with a comma.