dsa

Status
Not open for further replies.
My DSA has the sand cuts, and the only time its failed has been when I'm futzing with the gas system. I don't have one without sand cuts, so I can't say whether its reliable because of those cuts or not. However, the FAL is an incredibly rugged rifle with a reputation of reliability (go over to FALfiles and search for 'ol dirty) like an AK built with western finesse. I have the feeling that no civilian that pays DSA-level money for a rifle will ever put it through conditions that would require sand cuts to keep the rifle functioning.
 
Sorry if this is an ignorant question, but what are "sand cuts"??

P033.JPG


See those little zigzag cuts on the side of the carrier? Its those. Presumably they give grit that gets in the action somewhere to go so the rifle can continue to function.

ETA: Winston Smith beat me to it.
 
Sand cuts were specified by some nations armed forces that used the FAL in desert environments. Sand box tests apparently demonstrated this had some positive affect on reliability. Some of those tests were worst case scenarios, essentially blasting the rifles with fine grains of sand. Most civilian shooters will never use the rifle under such circumstances. When shopping for a FAL I would not let the presence or absence of them keep you from buying a rifle if it has the other features you want.

John
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top