Encounter with Anti-CCW

Status
Not open for further replies.

evan price

Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2005
Messages
5,514
Location
http://www.ohioccw.org/ Ohio's best CCW resour
I go to XYZville Rec Center quite often. Today they had an event for the kids, crafts exhibit type thing, and the kids started swim class. It's always busy there so I wound up changing in the mens locker room while the kids were with Mom in the family changing room.

I was dressing while a couple older guys were at the lockers across from me talking. They were obviously friends. Another guy was beside them, not with them.

One of the old guys says "Did you see they put a gun sign on the door?"
The other old guys say, "Yeah, that's because a lot of concealed and carriers can't read." and they both sort of snickered.
The younger guy (not with the old guys) says, "You can't carry a gun in here, right?"
The one old guy says, "That's right. But concealed carry people like to carry anyway, so they have to put up signs."
The young guy says, "Oh...I've been thinking aobut applying for a permit."
The other old guy says, "Why bother? You can't carry anywhere with it anyway, who needs to carry a gun today, except people who watch too many movies. There's no need to carry a gun today, and pretty soon they'll make it so you can't carry anywhere but your house. You already can't carry at post offices, banks, schools, malls, anywhere else. Save your money, it's not worth it, and you'll just get arrested if you try."

My ears are kind of burning right now since I had of course left my CCW piece locked in the glovebox (it's a government building, and I noticed they recently posted anyway).

The young guy says, "I thought you only couldn't carry in schools and stuff? The other places, too?"
The one old guy says, "Yeah, it's a federal law. You can't carry in your car, you can't carry in banks, post offices, BMV, credit unions, anywhere they have money."
The young guy says, "Oh.. I didn't know that. Maybe it's not worth getting one."

At this point I really could not hold my tongue any more.

"That's wrong," I said. "It's legal to carry in a bank or a store, as long as they don't post a sign. Car carry is legal, they even fixed the plain-sight requirement last year."

The old guys look at me like, how dare you contradict me. "Buddy, it's a federal law to carry in a bank."

I said, "No, you are wrong. I know Huntington allows CCW. I have a CCW and I always carry in Huntington, as a matter of fact, their director of corporate security even TOLD me it was ok."

The first old guy turns and squares off with me (Which, since we were both nearly naked is kind of an uncomfortable situation... shades of a gladiator movie, eh?) "I am a retired deputy sheriff from XXX county, I was a leo for 32 years, don't try to tell me the law."

I was getting frustrated so I said to the younger guy, "Check the AG's pamphlet, I have a copy in my car I can give you. ORC 2923.126, check it all out. It's on the web site. You are only forbidden to carry in places specifically listed in the law, and anyplace that posts a sign."

The ex-leo tells the guy, "You listen to him, you go to jail. It's a felony."

"No," I said. "If you go into a place that is specifically listed, which is government buildings, schools, places with D alcohol permit, that is a felony. If they have a sign it's a 4th degree misdemeanor. If they are not posted and not on the list of excluded places, it's perfectly legal- like I said, I keep a copy of the AG's booklet in my car in case I get a cop who doesn't know the new laws. I'll give it to you."

The ex leo's buddy is grinning and obviously amused.
The ex-leo says, "You concealed and carry ***holes think it's the g-d old west or something. Nobody needs to carry guns nowadays, I never had to shoot anybody in 32 years of law enforcement, I got people I locked up just coming out on parole and they were tough MFers and I don't carry a gun today. Have you ever once in your life had to draw your pistol?"

"Yes," I said. "A guy tried to attack me with a hammer about 18 months ago in Columbus."

"Well, I guess you are some kinda tough dude then." he said sarcastically.
"If I saw you on the street I would have you in cuffs. You don't need a gun. Only cops need guns. We run into all the bad people in society, we take the risks, we carry a gun for a reason. You concealed and carry people just like to think you are all bad*sses and sh*t. They never should have passed that G-D law and as long as more and more people keep doing s*t like shooting up malls and schools and sh*t they are going to take them all away eventually, you watch. Then where is your cute little concealed and carry going to get you?"

Then he stops. "Are you carrying a gun right now?" he asks, in a very authoritative tone of voice.

"No, are you?" I said back, getting hot. I was putting on my shoes by now.

"You know what? I can. That's where you concealed and carry people are wrong. I can carry a gun whenever I want. Go to the academy, get a badge, if you want to carry a gun. Do something for the people instead of just yourself.

"And you-" he points at the other guy. "Don't worry about carrying a gun, you'll never need it, and do you really want that on your conscience if you do?"

"Do you want it on your conscience if something happens and you weren't carrying a gun to protect your family?" I retorted, stuffing my stuff in my gym bag.

"Tell that to his family when some cop shoots his ***!" the ex-leo says, grabbing his stuff and leaving with his buddy.

I looked at the other guy and shrugged. "If you're leaving I'll get you that booklet," I offered.

"No thanks," the guy said. "Don't worry about it."

I let it lie and left.



This was three hours ago and I am still mad. This kind of eleteist bull really ticks me off. It's bad enough being an anti. But to put forward totally incorrect info for the express purpose of scaring somebody into NOT getting a CCW?

Why do *I* always run into these types?
I did my best not to get mad, because I am sure the fella would have welcomed me losing my temper, an illustration I am sure to show he was right. I had to bite my tongue several times not to tell this old fella off.

Just had to share it, to get it off my chest. Really, I am still mad. 3 hours later.
 
you handled it better than I would've good job staying cool and not telling him off
 
And some of you wonder why so many people in this forum have a bad opinion of police officers.

If just 10% of them have the same elitist attitude of this old timer its no wonder.
 
And some of you wonder why so many people in this forum have a bad opinion of police officers.

If just 10% of them have the same elitist attitude of this old timer its no wonder.

So if 10% of a certain group are ignorant idiots then it's acceptable to label the rest of the group? Wow that's certainly great logic. :banghead: Please stick to the topic at hand and don't turn this into a cop-bashing fest.

The guy was a total jerk and I'm glad you stepped up to say something. I'd have to say I would have too if I were there. One thing that drives me nuts like no other is when someone spouts off that they know something when they don't. :barf:
 
that sucks. some people are really ignorant, and usually especially the same people don't like to admit when they are wrong.
 
Maybe we should look at correcting that 10% instead of dismissing them as a non-issue. Apparently its bad enough that this vocal minority is bad enough to set the stereotype across the other 90%.

If the guy was a retired sheriff, how can he still carry in a government building? Do they get some lifetime carry permit or something as a retirement gift?

Anyhow there is a reason why there are so many specialized lawyers out there. The law books are voluminous and vast. No cop, regardless of what he might claim, can say with honesty that he/she knows all of the law.
 
Maybe we should look at correcting that 10% instead of dismissing them as a non-issue. Apparently its bad enough that this vocal minority is bad enough to set the stereotype across the other 90%.

I agree completely! How about all you LEO's on here? We at THR talk regularly about correcting Gun owners who set a poor example for others or who put Gun owners and ownership into a poor light. How about a little help with this on anti- officers?
 
Old Guy: "Blahblahblahblah..."

You: "This cute little old man is full of big-fish war stories and BS. You can listen to him or take the class from people who actually know. Let me get you some info."

If he persists, just walk away.


Edited for inappropriate content. Sorry mods.
 
Last edited:
I agree completely! How about all you LEO's on here? We at THR talk regularly about correcting Gun owners who set a poor example for others or who put Gun owners and ownership into a poor light. How about a little help with this on anti- officers?

Well what do you think we have been doing?? I myself constantly correct other officer's inaccuracies and lack of knowledge on gun law whenever I get the chance. Guess what though just because someone is a police officer doesn't make them any different than any other anti. So even if certain people know the law that still doesn't change their personal views. Cops are people just like anyone else and we all have varying opinions and viewpoints.
 
Why is it that the most ignorant members of any given group tend to be the loudest?

I guess that question kinda answers itself.
 
You did the right thing. People like that guy will confront you about all kinds of stuff, not just gun control/2a. I think you kept the high ground. You could have brought up constitutional rights and historical precedent, but you did great.

Anyway he probably would have gotten pissed if you'd contradicted him about anything, not just that issue. Some people just can't take it.

So if 10% of a certain group are ignorant idiots then it's acceptable to label the rest of the group? Wow that's certainly great logic. Please stick to the topic at hand and don't turn this into a cop-bashing fest.

I don't think the OP was cop bashing. I think the 10% tend to beat their chest so much that it can be a detriment to all cops. There, I said it. It isn't fair but that can be how it goes. It's no excuse to stereotype, but the buffoon referenced in the orig post actually made a generalization that all cops shared his opinions.

Anyway, just don't get mad. That's all that guy wanted, was to get a rise out of you, OP.
 
So if 10% of a certain group are ignorant idiots then it's acceptable to label the rest of the group? Wow that's certainly great logic. Please stick to the topic at hand and don't turn this into a cop-bashing fest.
I was only saying that there are many people that post here that are aghast and amazed that any law abiding person would have even the slightest negative attitude toward any member of law enforcement. My point is that blowhards like this guy are the reason why more and more of us don't trust the police. Of course I guess publicly posting anything other than glowing praise of all police is "cop bashing" to some folk around here.

I happen to know several in law enforcement that are on our side and they are doing a generally good job of straightening out their brother officers.

Anyway, the important things I get out of the OP's story are:
1) KNOW the law (be able to quote chapter and verse).
2) Carry copies of the law.
3) Don't take any crap from idiots :D
4) Be polite and professional (even with idiots).
 
Well what do you think we have been doing?? I myself constantly correct other officer's inaccuracies and lack of knowledge on gun law whenever I get the chance. Guess what though just because someone is a police officer doesn't make them any different than any other anti. So even if certain people know the law that still doesn't change their personal views. Cops are people just like anyone else and we all have varying opinions and viewpoints.

Then Sir, I honestly, truly, and sincerely applaud your efforts. Not being snide, I really mean that.

I know and am friends with a good number of officers, and have family in the profession as well. Most I know are good folks. Those who I know that are not really scare me though. A small number of folks, in a position of power, have a great potential for evil.

Sorry for the thread hi-jack!
 
I was only saying that there are many people that post here that are aghast and amazed that any law abiding person would have even the slightest negative attitude toward any member of law enforcement. My point is that blowhards like this guy are the reason why more and more of us don't trust the police. Of course I guess publicly posting anything other than glowing praise of all police is "cop bashing" to some folk around here.

I have no problem with someone having a negative attitude towards a MEMBER of law enforcement so long as said member did something to deserve such an attitude. In this particular case I would be the first to jump on this guy whether he was a fellow officer or not if he spouted off some nonsense like that around me.

My problem is that some people on this board, not saying you, like to take an example like this and then attach it to the rest of law enforcement and automatically assume that we are all the same way. It is akin to the way anti-gun folk take the actions of one twit committing a crime with a gun and saying the rest of us are waiting to do the same.
 
Then Sir, I honestly, truly, and sincerely applaud your efforts. Not being snide, I really mean that.

I know and am friends with a good number of officers, and have family in the profession as well. Most I know are good folks. Those who I know that are not really scare me though. A small number of folks, in a position of power, have a great potential for evil.

Sorry for the thread hi-jack!

I appreciate the sentiments. I have made it my mission ever since witnessing the gross lack of firearms law training in the police academy to educate those I have the chance to. Pretty much every one that knows me will tell anyone not to dispute gun law with me if someone tries to. :D

Edit: Just recently, now that I think of it, I had to correct my shift supervisor and my LT. who both thought that suppressors were completely illegal. It always amazes me how someone can be in LAW enforcement and not take the time to read and be familiar with the LAW.
 
Hold the line with truth and the most recent laws

Quote: Why do *I* always run into these types?
-----------
...

Blame it on your acute sense of SA (situational awareness).. a good thing.

Ya did good.. (considering)


Ls
 
The ex-leo tells the guy, "You listen to him, you go to jail. It's a felony."

My goodness. These people can do exactly that too... then it takes a judge and a lawyer to get out.
 
Not all LEO's are like the one above.
No but if you run into one like that while carrying in one of the places he thinks is a federal felony and you don't know your stuff you might spend a night or two in jail and have your gun confiscated until someone smartens him up.
 
Just like any job, there are those who know what their doing. And then there are the a-holes that don't, but will beat their chest and intimidate you into submission to convince they're right.... because they said so.

Typical bully, particularly boasting that he could ignore the signs and carry anyway....because of his badge. Hypocritical statement IMO. Glad he's done with law enforcement. I would have started laughing at this blowhard and tried to keep the atmosphere humorous and told the person interested in a CCW permit to study the laws, not the opinions. Opinions land you in trouble, knowing the letter of this particular law for your state keeps you out.
 
I simple response to cops who tell me that "if I don't carry, no one needs to carry."

"O.K., write down your name and address and daily routine and I will ensure that everyone knows that you do not carry, officer, sir."

It has never failed to shut them up. Fascists are always cowards.:)
 
Why is it that the most ignorant members of any given group tend to be the loudest?

Because some of the ignorant don't like having their ignorance exposed. It's a self-esteem issue, a former friend of mine is like that.

Tex
 
No cop, regardless of what he might claim, can say with honesty that he/she knows all of the law.

Precisely. It also isn't a cop's job to know or intepret the law in the first place, beyond what is necessary to make arrests. A cop could watch you snort 3 lines of white powder and then shoot a couple people, and you're still a "suspect." The police suspect you've committed a crime, but aren't qualified to make that decision.

The police's job is to get you to trial. The lawyer's job is (ideally) to interpret and explain the law for the jury. The jury's job is to decide innocence or guilt. And the judge's job is to pass sentence.

The police can testify and present evidence, like any other witness, but that's all they can really do in court. Their job is done when a suspect is in jail, before innocence or guilt is determined.
 
Sounds like the blowhard was trying to impress his friend.
You handled it very well.
The way he looks at it, if the ordinary citizen can carry, then there is nothing that makes him special.
This idiot has the same thought train as a middle-schooler.
 
My goodness. These people can do exactly that too... then it takes a judge and a lawyer to get out.
But then it takes a proctologist with a Juris Doctor and a fat checkbook to get my lawyer's foot out of his colon.

Innocent mistakes can can forgiven, if not forgotten.

Malicious arrogance should be punished with a studied and implacable cruelty. That creates what behavioral scientists call "negative reinforcement".
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top