What's happened to his website ? I haven't been able to open it for some time . www.stoppingpower.net
As arrogantly ill-informed as he is about computers, I take everything else he says with a grain of salt.Don't know what happened to the site, but I do know that Marshall and Sanow's work has been thoroughly discredited over the years.
Not sure if this is meant for me. If it is, I'm not sure what you mean by it. Just stating what I have learned doing research into terminal ballistics over the years. Sorry if you disagree. Check it out for yourself. It is not meant to be a reflection on the person, just methodology.As arrogantly ill-informed as he is about computers, I take everything else he says with a grain of salt.
In 6 years of posting on various gun boards, the only thing I remember Evan getting completely right was his analysis of what was (is) wrong with Glock's Model 36 - That examination was, 'spot on"
I got banned for "referring to another website without permission"... without ever having referred to a website.One of the strangest gun forums with the most cockamamie rules and regulations that I've ever been on. Think I got banned for not agreeing with, 'the great man'; but I'm not really sure. Might have just dropped off the board in disgust and simply forgot about it.
You have to respect somebody who humiliates SIPRI.Are you all Facklerites?
In order to "behave" one has to know what the required "behavior" is. That's pretty much impossible when the one mandating that "behavior" can't clearly define what constitutes that "behavior", and in fact doesn't know himself.But only if you can behave.
In order to "behave" one has to know what the required "behavior" is. That's pretty much impossible when the one mandating that "behavior" can't clearly define what constitutes that "behavior", and in fact doesn't know himself.
I'm waiting for rbernie to shout, STRIKE 3! YOU'RE OUT!I don't see this thread lasting much longer.
The rules are clearly posted. What can't you read or comprehend?In order to "behave" one has to know what the required "behavior" is. That's pretty much impossible when the one mandating that "behavior" can't clearly define what constitutes that "behavior", and in fact doesn't know himself.
It's one thing for the state to prohibit "speeding". It's quite another for the state to not define the speed limit, or worse, to ticket you for speeding based on the brand of tires on your car.