Everybody is Ignorant (Michael Moore + Oprah)

Status
Not open for further replies.

2dogs

Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2002
Messages
1,865
Location
the city
http://www.sierratimes.com/03/03/11/edrn031103.htm

Everybody is Ignorant
By Randall H. Nunn

Will Rogers once said, "Everybody is ignorant, only on different subjects." Truer words were never spoke and all one has to do for confirmation is tune in to the Oprah Winfrey show. The other day my wife was channel surfing and stopped to listen for a few minutes to Oprah and she called me to have a listen.
Oprah's guest was Michael Moore, the director who is responsible for a movie entitled "Bowling for Columbine." Happily, this movie has interested few outside of Moore's family, Oprah and possibly some of the mentally challenged in her audience. I didn't catch the beginning of the program but I did listen in amazement as Moore explained that much of what America has done in the world has been based on fear. Fear of the British, fear of the Indians, fear of black men. This fear caused Americans to arm themselves and, according to Moore, among other evil deeds, commit "genocide" against the American Indians. The National Rifle Association is somehow put on a par with the Ku Klux Klan and is portrayed as an evil organization. Oprah then brought out a professor who has written a book on "Fear" and who appeared in Moore's movie. Then the three of them proceeded to discuss many of the popular misconceptions about guns (which they agreed with) and expound on the problems created by white men and fear.

My first reaction on watching and listening to the distorted and inaccurate presentation was one of anger. How can these people who have benefited so greatly from the freedom this country offers, its government and economy, display so much animosity toward the founders of the country and the institutions that have made it great and blame the very people who helped set up this country for what they see as our society's greatest ills?

Then it occurred to me that maybe it was not so much animosity as it was ignorance. Michael Moore and Oprah either (1) failed American history and government, (2) have forgotten everything they learned, or (3) have bought a load of revisionist propaganda without questioning it and without measuring it against the very large body of information which is available in history books, on the Internet and elsewhere. Any one of these conclusions is frightening when one realizes that some consider Oprah to be an opinion leader. Michael Moore seems unhinged from reality yet Oprah seemed not be be able to say enough good things about his movie and suggested that her audience should all go see it (many of them nodding in agreement).

It then occurred to me that much of American probably reacts to Oprah as I did--they get angry, then they shake their heads and laugh because they realize she is spouting politically correct "touchy-feely" nonsense and represents an extremely small constituency. I am glad that I tuned in to the Oprah show because I never would have known what I was missing. Now I do, and it wasn't much. Yes, Mr. Rogers, everybody is ignorant, but for some their ignorance is broad-based and wide-ranging and breathtaking in scope and the media and "opinion leaders" in the media seem bent on cornering the market.
 
oprah didnt make her billion dollars because of a few philanthropist fans of hers. the fact is, he audience is the soccer-moms that rally against us peaceable, adorable, hugable gunowners. they are the ones driven by pure emotion and have kissed logic and common sense goodbye. all it took for their brainwashing to take root was the tears of just one victim. maybe we should shed a tear or two as well, see if we can make them change their colors?
 
Ironies abound. It's someone like Michael Moore who operates out of fear. And what Oprah is peddling is electronic Vicodin.

America has created much of what we call modern civilization, certainly the lion's share, and that has indisputably enriched the lives of a big chunk of this planet. One hates to think where the world would be if America had never existed.

Expect Moore to get his Oscar this year and for the Hollywood hypocrites to give him the heartfelt standing ovation that will gladden soccer moms everywhere.
 
He's right on the mark.

I wrote about BFC in my column (volunteer amateur writer, not professional) in one of our local papers. Lots of similarities.
------------------------------------------------------------


Critical Thinking


"Well, the trouble with our liberal friends is not that they are ignorant, but that they know so much that isn't so.â€
Ronald Reagan in his essay “A Time For Choosing†October 1964

I can think of no one that lives up to the above description more than Michael Moore. Folks tell me that he makes documentary films. I have seen all of his movies, and while they tend to be sardonically funny, I can say that I have yet to grasp the “documentary†aspect of his films.

For instance, in his latest film “Bowling For Columbineâ€, he gives viewers the impression that the precious little imps Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold were just ordinary boys that went bowling with their schoolmates in the morning, and then they simply slaughtered as many people as they could at lunchtime.

Nothing could be further from the truth.

Harris and Klebold weren’t ordinary. They were convicted criminals, they were bizarre Hitler worshipers, and their fellow students called them “The Trenchcoat Mafiaâ€. The other kids knew what they were.

Some surviving kids even said that they were aware that Harris and Klebold had plans to shoot people at school.

And yet, Mr. Moore believes that Harris and Klebold acted out of fear. He posits that Americans are sick in the head with fear. In the animated “History of the United States†- that he features within the “documentary†- he claims that America was even founded out of fear.

Let’s see…Folks sail half a planet away from the known world to pioneer a new life, and that is, for Mr. Moore at least, a sure sign of cowardice. Yeah, right.

Then in his “documentary†Mr. Moore states that those self-same ‘fraidy-cats killed all the Indians. Someone should tell the Native Americans, starting with the Wampanoag tribe. I reckon they are going to have to pull up stakes on Cape Cod since they’ve all been killed.

Perhaps the sweetest gem in Mr. Moore’s film is the assertion that the N.R.A. and the K.K.K. are essentially one and the same. I have a friend that says that I am mistaken about that, but unfortunately for her Mr. Moore used the animated character that represented the N.R.A. to pour the gas and burn the cross.

When one stops to consider that only the N.R.A. and a handful of other like minded civil rights organizations like the J.P.F.O. (not the A.C.L.U., nor the N.A.A.C.P.) have ever supported the right of minorities to use firearms to defend themselves and their loved ones, one then has to wonder where Mr. Moore gets his “documentary†information.

I don’t really know what informs Mr. Moore’s view of the world, but thanks to his tendency to promote his viewpoint, I can tell you how he feels about blacks and violence in particular.

Columnist Yasmin Alibhai-Brown of The Independent (UK), wrote, “The U.S. radical and author of the best-selling book 'Stupid White Men' was (mostly) clever, funny, angry, sharp, iconoclastic and skeptical about the lies and humbug processed by the U.S. government and big business. ... What we did not expect was to feel so enraged at one point that we almost walked out. It was when Moore went into a rant about how the passengers on the planes on 11 September were scaredy-cats because they were mostly white. If the passengers had included black men, he claimed, those killers, with their puny bodies and unimpressive small knives, would have been crushed by the dudes, who as we all know take no disrespect from anybody. ..."

I guess that in Mr. Moore’s world, it is OK for “black men†to crush people – provided that “the dudes†don’t use firearms - because it is in their nature to be violent?!? Mr. Moore’s warped little world makes my head hurt.

Not to mention that someone should have told the heroes of Flight 93 that they were the wrong color, at least in Mr. Moore’s view.

Mr. Moore isn’t totally pathetic. Even he was snapped briefly awake in the aftermath of 9/11. On September 22nd, 2001 Mr. Moore wrote on his weblog www.michaelmoore.com

“I cannot go to work. But I have a film to finish. Our editor has been unable to make it in from New Jersey, but he is there now waiting for some word on what to do. I can’t even think about this movie. I don’t WANT to think about it because if I think about it I will have to face an ugly truth that has been gnawing through my head…
This started out as a documentary on gun violence in America, but the largest mass murder in our history was just committed -- without the use of a single gun! Not a single bullet fired! No bomb was set off, no missile was fired, no weapon (i.e., a device that was solely and specifically manufactured to kill humans) was used. A boxcutter! -- I can't stop thinking about this. A thousand gun control laws would not have prevented this massacre. What am I doing?


The truth doesnâ€t get much uglier than that. Does it Mr. Moore? Ah, but then you have your “documentary†and book to pimp. Don’t you?
 
It then occurred to me that much of American probably reacts to Oprah as I did--they get angry, then they shake their heads and laugh because they realize she is spouting politically correct "touchy-feely" nonsense and represents an extremely small constituency.
I wish that were true.

Oprah hasn't gotten to be a billionaire by having no influence over her audience, however. Nor has she fought her way to the top of a very competitive heap by alienating her audience. She says the things her audience wants to hear, and echoes back what they say to her. That is why she is so popular.

As bitter as it may be to accept for those of us who do care about objective facts and not emotionalism, Oprah is popular because she says what millions of people want to hear.

pax

The fame of great men ought to be judged always by the means they used to acquire it. -- Francois de La Rochefoucauld
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top