Surely I’m not the only person on THR who has a cartridge they love for no real reason. For me, it’s the 6.5x55. I have a couple rifles chambered in the x55 and I can’t explain exactly why I like it so much. I don’t reload, so it is nothing more than an expensive, long-action 6.5 Creedmoor for me. I guess it’s just nostalgia, but I really like that round and I’ve accumulated nearly as much 6.5x55 ammo as I have anything else, including 22 LR even though I rarely shoot the two rifles I have outside of hunting season.
So, let’s hear it. Who else has a rifle cartridge they love for no real reason?
I took up the .308 as favorite, but only because: I was issued an m14 in high school (Sgt. Major kept the firing pins; rifle team used .22 LR target rifles); 7.62 NATO surplus was available around the globe a half century ago (some still is); the .308 gets the job done; cartridge selection, target, big game, medium game; the ammo and rifles I've had have all proved accurate beyond my ability to make the most of it.
For nostalgia reasons and for ammo availability (back decades ago) I loved having my .303 Enfields. I do not know why I like Enfields. To me, they are ugly; nevertheless, there's just something about them. The action is as slick as glass. Their accuracy may not be that of the .308, yet if something gets the job done, then you simply can't argue with that reality. Maybe I was a British soldier in a former lifetime (but I don't believe in reincarnation).
I've had a bunch of Nagants in 7.62x54R. Why? They were mega-cheap back in the day ($150 or less per rifle). Could buy buy big wooden crates of ammo for a song. The carbines (especially the ones I sporterized) kicked pretty good, but what a handy-rifle/"truck-gun"!. Just throw one behind the seat of your truck. Ammo came in stripper clips. The rifles work. I'd polish the chambers to fix the case sticking problems some had. I'd free-float the barrels, get rid of the bayonets, and lose the forend furniture. Poof, "handy-rifle". I have tools of my dad's that are post-WWII (maybe pre-WWII) and I continue to use them today. His one toolbox sits beside me now. If something works, it works. I hate waste -- it's a sin somehow.
As to the 6.5 Swede: Had a work-mate who was a high-tech/engineer with whom I worked. He was more intelligent than I (he was freaky intelligent, IQ well over 140). He was also very OCD. He took up the 6.5 Swede as an interest, then went nuts with it. Witnessing his work with the 6.5 Swede convinced me that this was a "sweet spot" in rifle engineering. No one has ever said that the Swedes were stupid ... quite the opposite. The sectional density of 6.5 bullets can be made extraordinarily wondrous. Add that the 6.5 diameter is mega-efficient. For non-dangerous game / monster beasts, the bullet availability can cover a vast range of needs to bring all manner of critters down effectively / mercifully / humanely -- i.e. drop them where they stand.
I'm now a senior citizen; made the decisions I made; however, if I had it all to do over again, I must say that I would go with today's 6.5 Creedmore as my go-to cartridge / rifle. It is a near clone of the 6.5 Swede which has proved itself over a century of use. Hey, the 6.5 Swede is also a chambering for many new rifles! It does my old heart good to see the 6.5 chamberings come back into popularity. The word "delighted" comes to mind. Good stuff. Hurrah!
.